💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

BobS10 (Connecticut)
Posts: 39
Posted:
I read an interesting article in the newspaper yesterday, legislative hearings are beginning to allow homeowners, including those in a condo, etc. to hang clotheslines to dry their clothes, thus saving electricity.
This is the first I have heard of this but they mention in the article that Florida already passed this legislation.
Just curious, maybe Donna can fill us in on how this has gone over with condos in her state?
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Bob,

Florida law forbids ordinances, deed restrictions, covenants, or similar binding agreements from prohibiting solar equipment use. Under this law, a homeowner may not be denied - by "any entity granted the power or right in any deed restriction, covenant or similar binding agreement to approve, forbid, control, or direct alteration of property..." - permission to install a solar collector, clothesline, or other energy device using renewable resources."

This is part of the "Florida Renewable Energy Technologies and Energy Efficiency Act" Now that's a mouthful.

We had this come up with a resident who basically wanted to test the waters against enforcement of the new law. Our covenants strictly forbid the use of clotheslines but if you remember the authority of our laws and Documents, THE STATE IS THE HIGHER AUTHORITY. So we created an adendum per State requirements to the covenant stateing that clotheslines may be used as a temporary system, with the lines being up ONLY when in use and no more than any period longer than 5 hours, between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m and restricted to 1 day per week. Also, because of the way our lots and homes are situated, all lines must be within our "Zone 4" which is our back yards.

Luckily no one is doing the lines, along the many fairways where the golf course is set. I think that the manager of the course would go bonkers if he saw clotheslines. Our Developement is in the 5 to 8 hundred thousand dollar homes and most of these people are not outdoor hanging method people .
BobS10 (Connecticut)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Thanks Donna, I knew I could count on you for the particulars. I suspect this is going to pass, even though CAI plans to oppose it. We will see but at least now I have the outline of what we need to implement if and when the law changes.
It is ironic, our condos were built twenty years ago and i have noticed most of the decks have one of those old retracting clotheslines on them, even though as long as I have been here, the HOA forbids the practice.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Bob,

I think that it won't be long before each State will have to allow any energy saving methods and that will include condo and HOA living communities. Gads!!! Oil at $3.05 yesterday, and hardly no water for the power plants, I think that we will all need to be drying out on lines pretty soon.

Have you checked with the Conn. State energy laws? They might be starting to get on board with energy use reduction.
BobS10 (Connecticut)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Funny you mention that about energy reduction programs. I just finished writing an article for the newsletter we are working on about the home energy audit I just had done.
Great program, they came in, did a complete audit, caulked, weatherstripped, replaced shower heads, gave me a Kill A Watt meter, and even replaced every lightbulb in my house with a compact flourescent, all at NO CHARGE!
They said i was the first condo in our complex they had been to, hopefully after the newsletter article publishes that will change.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Good Job to you. We need to send the info out to all of our membership everywhere because most commuities now have this program available . I know my rental places both have had the inspections. The HOA TALK homepage has an article about Conneticut lawmakers considering a "WET LAUNDRY BILL" as they call it. Hang on HOA Boards because I see lots of work coming in the future.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
Donna nailed it... Florida forbids stopping the use of them, and it sounds like her board has a defensible, reasonable position. Someday, it may be challenged in court, but it sounds well thought out; a reasonable accomodation to serve the HOA and the statute both.

I believe California has a similar law, and in fact, a recent court case is testing the validity/stupidity of that law. An owner with a solar collector in his yard recently sued, and won, to have his neighbor cut down trees on the neighbor's property that were shading it. This case pitted the supremacy of the solar power law against the status of the environmental lobby who love to promote shade trees for energy savings, air quality, etc.. It's still in appeals.

DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Brian,
That is an interesting statement that you finished up with about "someday it may be challenged in court" because when we wrote this, we did argue on whether or which part could be challenged. Right now, our Energy act does not deny us the ability to restrict times or places of hanging the clotheslines but I am sure that it will some day. Just as your adding about the tree owner verses the solar collector, where does too much end. I want the trees and when a neighbor has my tree cut down, I might be not very happy. Now Florida also prohibits HOAs from banning Solar panels on the roofs too so this solar verses the HOAs situation will be a problem that we see more often.

Just a footnote. My Husband works as a Designer for a Solar Light company in Florida. One of the biggest hurdles that he has to overcome everyday, are the obstacles that inhibit the panels from getting enough sunlight. They are now able to make the panels so much smaller and more efficient but there is always room for improvement.
TracyT (Maryland)
Posts: 228
Posted:
Hi,

FYI Maryland is also considering engery reductions bills for HOAs this session. Last year our engery increased about 50%. We are due for another 20 to 30% increase soon with the remainder coming (for a total of 100%) soon after.

Tracy
HaroldS (Arizona)
Posts: 906
Posted:
Arizona still refuses to address clothes lines altho they have pretty well nailed down solar collectors. I'm happy to see more states jumping on this - maybe it will shame our Arizona legislators to do something if Conn can, in view of our abundant year around sunshine.
We are ardent practitioners of solar clothes drying. We have been "hanging out" for over 40 years living here and the ten years we've lived in this HOA. Both our mothers never owned a dryer. Our clothes line is carefully hidden by a fence and tested with our "visible to a six foot person standing at ground level." It can probably be seen by the two story homes, but they can't do swat about that. We also put it up and take it down after use. Not to satisfy the HOA but to keep the bird s**t off it and it lasts a lot longer not out in the sun year around.
I knowI would have to challenge your rules tho Donna - about the 10 - 3 time slot. Maybe your Florida winter sun is warmer than ours, but our clothes do not dry in that time span in the winter. They are usually heavier - jeans, sweat clothes, etc. Now summer would be o.k. The first you hang are almost dry before you finish the last. LOL.
Viva solar drying! Harold
SidneyP (Florida)
Posts: 302
Posted:
I agree w/ Harolds...I'm 71 years old and love the smell of clothes hung out doors. I have always hung cloths on a cloths line until I moved to Flordia and into a HOA. I had 6 children a year apart, there were many diapers, I never used disposable diapers. Cloth diapers were always used and I still would today (if they even have them) if I had children....Clothes lines never bothered me, in fact I like to see cloths blowing in the breeze. My clothes line was as neat as I am, everything was all hung in order, all diapers together, all shirts, all under wear, ect....Another thing that may be hard for younger women to believe is that I still hand wash my dishes. I have had a dishwasher most of my life but have NEVER used them. They have always served as an additional cabinet for me...This is where I store my snacks....I do this not only to save energy/water but because I love the feel of the warm water on my hands...May I add, I alwasy worked outside the home, had to w/six children. So I am glad I can now do this once again.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Harold,
Our average winter temp is in the 70s so that is never an issue. As I said, these residents don't know the pluses of hanging outdoors. Maybe someone will not like it and challenge but we had to start somewhere. Don't forget, our covenants strictly forbid the clotheslines so this was written basically to comply with the new Energy Act.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
Donna: I would arm myself with the times of electrical peak usage information from Florida power companies. That could help you defend the times you have chosen for line drying, as either: replacing the use of a dryer at peak electrical demand, or, timed to coincide with washing machine use before peak electrical demands.

Be prepared to position your HOA as the energy conscious ones! It's never too early to start preparing your spin!
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Good Point Brian, I'll add that to the research folder that I have prepaired. Thank You
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
I must be missing something Donna. The section of the law you quoted lists not being able to 'forbid' or 'control'. Limiting it to 5 hours is definitely controlling it.

You later say "Right now, our Energy act does not deny us the ability to restrict times or places of hanging the clotheslines but I am sure that it will some day."

I hang my laundry out and it rains at hour 4. Clothes are wet. Rain continues for 10 more hours. So am I in violation cause I didn't remove it by the 5 hour deadline, wet clothes and all?
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

DJ,
Interpreted by the association attorney, he stated that we still have the ability to restrict placement of the lines and your scenerio is a little excessive. We DO NOT have clothes line cops in our developement. We have "GUIDELINES" so as to be in compliance with the Statutes. Until we can have an amendment changes re; this subject, this is what the BOD voted to write.
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Your quote intrigued me but I see I misread the first part. The Bill was referring to any authority that has the ability to control.

Still, the 10-3pm GUIDELINE doesn't appear enforceable because to do so would have the effect of prohibiting the device.

It seems to me the law does not require the removal and re-installment of an enery saving device since the Bill lists solar panels, and clotheslines in the same section.

Still the guidelines may not be so reasonable if I have a big family and you are limiting me to 1 day a week for from 10-3...unless I erect a 100' long clothesline to get them all done, and dried in the 5 hours. My Rain example may be excessive but it is NO exageration that we do a couple loads every other day! Now I'm gonna have to do it all in one day!

http://www.fsec.ucf.edu/en/consumer/solar_hot_water/q_and_a/rights.htm#s163

Last sentence is interesting.

"While a homeowner cannot be prevented from installing a solar energy system, certain restrictions may be imposed without violating the law. However, those restrictions must be reasonable, not arbitrary, and uniformly imposed on homeowners in a subdivision. The restrictions cannot act to impair the performance of a solar system or it may be seen as "effectively" prohibiting solar. "
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Don't leak this.

Our little island would be ideal to put up a couple windmills. I would expect we could generate all the electricity for our 65 unit condo. Habe an ideal spot on a point of land. There is no windmill there now, but there will be as soon as the first one goes up elsewhere.

This island will sink into the acquafer from all the residents stomping their feet. They like to call our Island Pristine.........yeah....right!
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
I considered a wind turbine but it would have to be 65' and apparently they require annual maintenance. Picture my 65' tower in a regular sub-division with homes generally about 20' apart!

Good thing they don't have Florida energy laws here....at least for my neighbours.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

DJ,

From Dec 1st usually thru May 1st, one out of every 5 cars down here have Ontario plates on them. And then we wonder why the natural resources are being stressed.
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Fortunately Canada is your number one supplier of these limited natural resources!

By the way, we have owned a hybrid since mid 2000 so when we do come down we still spew less emissions and use less fuel that those honkin' big SUV's ya'll like. hehehe
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
PS. I was referring the lack of Florida energy laws here being advantageous to my neighbours because it prevented them from having to suffer the 'blight' of a tower or solar panels we wanted to put in. I'm in favour of towers, panels and anything else we can do to avoid drilling for more oil in sensitive areas like Anwar.
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Forgot....

Eh.
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Oh, and just to make sure I get put on the watch list, we also fly to Cuba each year....but we buy Carbon credits to offset our footprint. Ya'll got any Canadian back bacon to go with my grits.
JosephW (Michigan)
Posts: 882
Posted:
People, don't wait for the state to pass some version of screwed up legislation. You need to get an energy and conservation committee going in your association now. More important than solar or clotheslines is water conservation (except in my state and Ontario). At least make sure your docs allow for brown lawns during local lawn watering bannings. I can't tell you how many times I read in various news articles about a county that had banned watering lawns and associations sending out violation notices for brown lawns. Talk about stupidity! Get some xeriscaping options going. Tell the committee you want to cut common grounds irrigation in half every year for the next 5 years and to find a way to do it.

Start warning the owners now that they're going to have to reduce or elimiate planting some of the water-hungry annuals, shrubs, trees and other things they've grown to love, and give them options.

Come up with a reasonable clothes line proposal and put it out to a vote. Start looking at ways solar panels would fit in with your landscaping, or roofs.

In other words, try and get out front of this one. If you don't the legislature will do it for you and I can guarantee you they'll make a mess of it.

Joe

Joseph West
Official HOATalk.com Sponsor
Community Associations Network, LLC
www.CommunityAssociations.net

*See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
You're right there Joseph, legislation isn't always initiated just because these guys woke up on day and said let's write a new Bill.

One correction though on water conservation. Even though we are right next to one of the great lakes we still have had watering restrictions every summer for as long as I can remember. Maybe we're saving it so it can be diverted to Las Vegas!
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JosephW on 02/29/2008 7:07 PM
People, don't wait for the state to pass some version of screwed up legislation. You need to get an energy and conservation committee going in your association now. More important than solar or clotheslines is water conservation (except in my state and Ontario). At least make sure your docs allow for brown lawns during local lawn watering bannings. I can't tell you how many times I read in various news articles about a county that had banned watering lawns and associations sending out violation notices for brown lawns. Talk about stupidity! Get some xeriscaping options going. Tell the committee you want to cut common grounds irrigation in half every year for the next 5 years and to find a way to do it.

Start warning the owners now that they're going to have to reduce or elimiate planting some of the water-hungry annuals, shrubs, trees and other things they've grown to love, and give them options.

Come up with a reasonable clothes line proposal and put it out to a vote. Start looking at ways solar panels would fit in with your landscaping, or roofs.

In other words, try and get out front of this one. If you don't the legislature will do it for you and I can guarantee you they'll make a mess of it.

Joe

Excellent advice. And very proactive.

BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Bob,

Yes, it's true. You might want to check out the article in the Hartford Courant yesterday. Go to www.courant.com and look for the article titled "Airing Their Wet Laundry." There's also an article in the NY Times which mentions Seven Hills Estates in East Hampton. I've attached a copy of the proposed legislation.
📎 Attachments (1):

⏸ Downloads temporarily unavailable

📝1315089771.doc(23 KB)
JamesG (Connecticut)
Posts: 83
Posted:
I have been following the progress of HB5995, the so-called "Right to Dry" bill, through the legislative process. While the objective of the bill to encourage energy conservation is admirable, the approach is seriously flawed when it comes to applying this possible law to condominium or common interest communities.

There are many practical impediments to effective implementation in the condominium environment, but the most serious defect in the proposed bill has to do with the State's effort to control the behaviors of those that choose to live in a community bound together as an association of willing members.

When each buyer purchased into such a community, they were required to review and agree to adhere to a defined set of rules. These rules are typically defined in a Declaration, Bylaws and Rules document or by some other similarly titled document. These documents are recorded in the Town Clerks office. They comprise a binding, legal contract between the buyer of the unit and the Association. Such contacts are intended to protect the property rights of each owner in the Association.

HB5995 seeks to set aside one provision of this contract as it applies to my association, i.e., allowing the use of clotheslines in the common elements where my legal documents expressly forbid this behavior. One can argue all day long about the benefits to solar drying of clothes, but that is not the point. The point is:

Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution says, “No State shall … pass any … Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts.” This contract clause prohibits any state government from passing a law that would interfere with contracts made by citizens, either by weakening the obligations assumed by parties to a contract or by making a contract difficult to enforce.

What the State needs to do is educate consumers and in particular, provide good "sales" materials to condominium boards so that they can work with their community members to amend their documents to permit use of solar drying equipment (clotheslines, racks), solar panels, and other energy or water conservation devices.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
James,
Good Lord man I started to read this "right to dry thread" and thought they were going to rescind my decision in 1984 to stop trying to drink all the liquor in the world.

Upon reading further I endorse this concept 100% and also agree this Document restrictions we try to live under are a work in progress and should be treated as such and probably each association will need a little tweaking to the restrictions to better serve the ownership and above all, the real property.

A good informative post, worthy of note.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
We have a bill introduced in the AZ House, entitled "energy saving devices" which prohibits an HOA from prohibiting "the installation of awnings, shutters, trellises & ramadas; attic or garage fans, vents or louvers; energy efficient outdoor lighting devices that contain coiled or straight flourescent bulbs; solar recharging panels, motion detectors or other equipment connected to the lighting device; and clothlines." I think that about covers any imagineable energy saving device! The assn would be allowed to adopt rules regarding the placement and the color if those rules do not prevent the installation or impair the functioning or restrict its use or adversely affect the efficiency of the device. However, the bad news is that this bill has gone nowhere. It hasn't even been heard in committee and the leg. session is coming to an end. So, it's a dead bill!!!
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaryA1 on 03/27/2009 3:27 PM
We have a bill introduced in the AZ House, entitled "energy saving devices" which prohibits an HOA from prohibiting "the installation of awnings, shutters, trellises & ramadas; attic or garage fans, vents or louvers; energy efficient outdoor lighting devices that contain coiled or straight flourescent bulbs; solar recharging panels, motion detectors or other equipment connected to the lighting device; and clothlines." I think that about covers any imagineable energy saving device! The assn would be allowed to adopt rules regarding the placement and the color if those rules do not prevent the installation or impair the functioning or restrict its use or adversely affect the efficiency of the device. However, the bad news is that this bill has gone nowhere. It hasn't even been heard in committee and the leg. session is coming to an end. So, it's a dead bill!!!

That's a bummer! And so -- out of sync -- with today's issues!

Personally, though, I've never quite understood the clothesline ban anyway.

Who doesn't love the smell of sun-dried clothes!

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Micchele and Mary,
That is a bummer and out of sync. It is also typical of what associations have to face in all States if they want to get keep up with the times. If you compare the State legislature with absentee owners of associations making amendments to our governing documents, you can draw a lot of similarites. I would hope that associations will prove over time they can run their business better than absentee directions or laws. It would be interesting if we could grade all associations and rank them according to effectiveness. I still believe the majority will fare pretty well, even though this site is full of failed or in trouble HOA's. I expect the success stories have little use for a site like this, so we are really tainted evidence.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
I don't have the option of line drying. I live in a townhome with attached units, have no front yard and my back has no yard either since it abuts a small lake. And to the poster who says hand washing her dishes saves water, that is not so. It has been proven that fully loaded dishwashers use less water than hand washing. To save electricity you can choose the air dry option on the dishwasher.
DorothyO (Washington)
Posts: 293
Posted:
Out of the voluminous response on this subject not one person mentioned the fabulous Breezecatcher. It is made in Dublin, but now also has a plant in Michigan to ship from. It is a portable, collapsable, brilliantly designed work of art. All you do is dig a hole large enough to fit a 9X9" cinder block filled with cement. You position the clothesline rod into the cylinder to secure position and balance, remove and wait for the cement to dry. Not only does the Breezecatcher hold an amazing amount of laundry with its umbrella form, but it spins, as in "catches the breeze," so clothes dry in half the time of a normal clothesline. Finally, its unique design and state of the art material is made to withstand those formidable Irish winds. We have winds that rocket through here routinely at 25-40 miles an hour. This baby laughs at them. Plus, it is so beeeyyoootteeful!

When your clothes are dry you remove the Breezecatcher and put it away. So its design also preserves it from the assault of being outside all the time. AND it cannot be seen over a 6-ft fence. We do not have clotheslines covenants, although, everyone THINKS we do. I think they think such a restriction would come under the ambiguous permanent structure scenario, in remembering the two-pole clotheslines stretching across the yards of our childhoods. I do my laundry on Fridays and my yard is clothesline-free for the rest of the week. If anyone would challenge me I would point out its temporary nature and then go bask in the aroma of my freshly dried sheets. I don't use my drier for 6 months!

Clothesline restrictions can be enforced AND not violate any state laws with this temporary solution. Go to Breezecatcher .com.

There are just so many reasons to love the Irish!

Dorothy
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
DorothyO,
I have no idea why, but I have a visual of the clothers spinning around in this enclosure and a couple babies hanging from the lines going about 50 mph and the kids crying out,"it is so beeeyyoootteeful!"
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
I have no problem with clotheslines, whether they can be seen above the fence or not. I grew up in a small town in PA and EVERYONE hung their clothes out every Monday. There's is nothing like the smell of clothesline dried clother, even in the winter! I remember coming home from school in the winter months and seeing my brothers' jeans frozen on the clothesline. The clotheslines were always strung in the front yard and taken down every Monday evening. I don't recall ever seeing a clothesline left up! The umbrella clothesline that Dorothy described sounds wonderful.

But, getting back to the topic of this thread, I would have no problem with seeing any of the energy saving devices stated in the AZ bill on the homes in my neighborhood. I think some of the HOA boards get a bit carried away with the "preserving property values" reason for banning so many things. I think they should all speak to an appraiser to get the specifics of what determines the property value of an individual home and also a neighborhood.
DorothyO (Washington)
Posts: 293
Posted:
Yeah, you know a baby weighs about as much as a wet towel -- not as stiff though, and so much softer!

I like what Mary said about HOA's getting carried away with the whole "property value" mantra. I think I will take the suggestion to talk to an appraiser or real estate agent about what really constitutes property value. I will also keep in the forefront of my mind this potential to get carried away with restrictions as I try to unpack the ambiguous language in our CC&R's during this revision process I am just beginning, which, now that I think about it, is not unlike twirling about on my Breezecatcher!

Dorothy
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Dorothy,

I have an idea. Perhaps you can pin up all the CCR restrictions on your breezecatcher. Wait for one of those 40-50 mph wind storms and the ones that don't fall off are the ones to keep! LOL
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Our CCRs permit clotheslines, provided laundry is removed every evening and the lines are used within the unit's patio area (hopefully it has a fence to block the view)

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Our CCRs permit clotheslines, provided laundry is removed every evening and the lines are used within the unit's patio area (hopefully it has a fence to block the view)

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaryA1 on 03/28/2009 10:15 AM
I have no problem with clotheslines, whether they can be seen above the fence or not. I grew up in a small town in PA and EVERYONE hung their clothes out every Monday. There's is nothing like the smell of clothesline dried clother, even in the winter! I remember coming home from school in the winter months and seeing my brothers' jeans frozen on the clothesline. The clotheslines were always strung in the front yard and taken down every Monday evening. I don't recall ever seeing a clothesline left up! The umbrella clothesline that Dorothy described sounds wonderful.

But, getting back to the topic of this thread, I would have no problem with seeing any of the energy saving devices stated in the AZ bill on the homes in my neighborhood. I think some of the HOA boards get a bit carried away with the "preserving property values" reason for banning so many things. I think they should all speak to an appraiser to get the specifics of what determines the property value of an individual home and also a neighborhood.

yes, because I can imagine that a LOT of the energy saving/carbon-footprint saving features in homes are actually property value increasers!

At least now, anyway!
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Would hanging some 'clothing' that have a slogan on be a violation of the no sign bylaw?
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
DJ,
Not if the slogan said:

No Signs Allowed!
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
I would be disinclined to consider clothing hung (which is intended to be hung temporarily at best) to be defined as "signage."

My obviously unqualified and non-expert "opinion" then would be "No. Slogans on clothing is not considered signage under our governing documents."

But that's not to say someone who may be smarter, more qualified or more "expert" than I would not find otherwise.

DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Great, l'll put up my scarecrow and hang some clothes on him to dry....temporarily.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Sounds good!

You wouldn't be in violation in our development!
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
DJ,

Your scarecrow would be OK in my HOA too, as long as he wasn't over 6' tall! You could even put him in your front yard during Halloween, but would have to leave any extra clothes off.
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
A NAKED scarecrow!!! Now THAT would scare the birds away for sure....and maybe a few little ol ladies too! (no offense to the ladies.)
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
DJ,

You are tooo funny! But, a naked scarecrow would just be straw!

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here