, seems like both of you are recommending minimizing the disclosure to unit owners. This is good to know - and is the opposite of what I assumed.
I will add that I also discourage disclosing speculation to owners. I think the phrase "pending litigation" is rife with speculation. The phrase is easily misunderstood.
If this advances to an real lawsuit, isn't there a duty to notify all unit owners of the lawsuit?
From what I am seeing from HOA attorneys, the answer is "It depends." See for example:
https://nowackhoward.com/hoa-lawsuit-disclosure/
https://www.davis-stirling.com/HOME/R/Reporting-Lawsuits (ultimately saying the board should disclose litigation]
https://beckerlawyers.com/pending-litigation-and-condominium-association-disclosure-obligations-news-press/ has the following observation for Florida Condos:
"Section 718.119(3) of the Condominium Act provides that if the association is involved in any legal action in which it may be exposed to liability in excess of insurance coverage protecting it and the unit owners, the association is required to give reasonable notice to the unit owners and the unit owners have the right to intervene and defend in the lawsuit."
Two other points to remember --
-- People can go online and/or to the county courthouse and look up for themselves, at any time, any litigation where the HOA is a party. This argues for the Board saying as little as possible to owners. At most, the Board perhaps should state something like: "An owner is suing the Board. For legal reasons, the board chooses not to try to interpret facts or the law. Nor does the Board care to speculate. All the board can say is that the HOA is being sued." The Board should not even direct owners to the county courthouse. In no way should the Board try to act as an attorney. Often times owners have a duty to do their own homework.
-- Remember that the HOA has to disclose litigation in the HOA disclosure to buyers and lenders.