Thanks to all for the replies. Allow me to explain further what is happening. Our community turf conditions have been abysmal since last summer. The Board had no intention to do anything. I initiated a 65-homeowner petition to request a sod meeting last March and the Board has used very excuse not to hold the meeting. The sod reserve has $941 and the unrestricted reserve fund has $129,000. I initiated a second petition to request a reserve fund and budget meeting to vote re-allocation of some of that unrestricted reserve in August. That unrestricted reserve is non-statutory and not earmarked for anything. We have separate painting, roof-cleaning, irrigation, and sod reserve funds. We have no responsibility for street repair.
In addition to using blast email via our member funded website to intimidate and discourage the petition, the board sought a legal opinion that stated we could not do what we expected at the meeting. In the Board's response letter to our petition the board did recognize our right (FS 720.3030 to influence reserve funds with a majority vote. I have secured 58 signed limited proxy statements (since we typically have 24 or less homeowners attend meetings) which represents a majority that voted to re-allocate $85,000 to the sod reserve along with some other specific budget items. Florida Statute recognizes the close relationship between reserve funds and the budget so it only seems logical that the majority should have some say in the budget.
The board even went so far as to use the blast email to discourage homeowners from signing a proxy by telling them they are giving their proxy the opportunity to vote however he/she wanted. The board used that medium to defame our small group by stating we were spreading misinformation and that we were not authorized to officially speak for the POA. They encouraged homeowners not to sign the proxy but to attend the meeting in person. The board knows that the likelihood of 58 homeowners attending is remote. The Board even prayed on homeowner fears by saying it was a waste of money to hold a meeting where the homeowners could do nothing. In my response, I calculated that the only cost was for the legal opinion the board already sought - a sunk cost.
Over the last 6 months have established an email friend's group of nearly 70 homeowners (out of 114) that I share routine updates with. Every action I or my small group has taken is shared with that friend's group. I am finally seeing results as homeowners are getting off the couch and getting involved. There is a realization that we are no longer the silent majority and hence the 58 signed proxy statements. The chatter in response to the Board's blast emails is encouraging.
While our By-laws do say the Board develops and approves the budget, given all said, I still feel the majority should be able to influence the budget. Given our Board's arrogance I know recall is an option. I am not looking for anyone's head. I just want the board to exercise its fiduciary duty and work for the betterment of the community. Thanks.
Chuck