💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,028
Posted:
soooooo. after asking for over a month to review the election ballots and proxies and tally's. Myself and A current board member went to the mgmt company offices to view the records.(recall that we are self managed condominium who uses this mgmt company for financials only and also as the registered managing agent) Long story short. The election results that were announced to not match the proxies and ballots that were turned in. There were results were within 1 to 2 percentage points. Come to find out, the "neutral" observer subjectively rejected 12 votes. Reasons were not consistent and did not match the actual records. Of those votes. 10 negatively impacted group A. 2 negatively affected group B. of the 12, 2 were legitimate rejections. 10 were absolutely valid votes. the votes materially change the outcome. SIGNIFICANTLY.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,028
Posted:
When we notified the mgmt agent "neutral" election official of the numerous issues that did not match the actual proxies and votes. He said we needed to send him a line item specifics of what we were disputing. We spent 15 hours going back to view the records and manually reconstruct each and every proxy and match it to a ballot. We created a line item explanation of each dispute and showed the effect it would have on the vote tally. We were assured that if the issues raised were verified, they would do the right thing. UM.. The next morning we get an email from the mgmt agent , not addressing any of the line items he required we specify and explain. He said, he stands by his results and we would have to ask the board if they would agree to adress the issue and or go to court.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,028
Posted:
Here is the email we sent after the first audit.. and the response we got back.

.JXXXX,

After an exhaustive audit of the proxies, ballots, sign-in sheets and other documentation contained in the election records we identified numerous discrepancies affecting the election tally. This is not just a few votes here or there. The election results are not accurate and need to be corrected.

Our review found ballots that should have been counted but were not, as well as ballots that were counted despite significant questions regarding their validity. There appears to have been arbitrary exclusion of certain votes where valid proxies were submitted, while other questionable proxies and ballots were included in the count.

Many of the discrepancies appear to stem from incorrect or missing unit types written on ballots, including bulk ballots prepared by your employe assigned to the meeting to collect proxies and tally votes. In several instances, valid votes were excluded because of administrative errors that can be reconciled through the underlying proxies, ownership records, and sign-in documentation.

Based on our findings, the outcome that was announced does not accurately reflect the votes cast by the owners. We would like to meet with you to review these discrepancies, examine the supporting documentation, and discuss the appropriate path forward to ensure the election results accurately reflect the will of the membership.

Please advise as to when you are available to meet this week as this is an urgent matter.

He responds.. "Identify your concerns in writing and I will respond accordingly. "

We respond...JXXXX,

Thank you for your response.

Our concerns have been identified through an exhaustive review of the election records and generally fall into the following categories:
Ballots excluded due to incorrect or missing unit types despite supporting documentation that identifies the voting owner and unit.
Valid proxies that were submitted but not counted.
Ballots counted where the supporting proxy or sign-in documentation raises questions regarding validity.
Discrepancies between sign-in records, proxies, and ballots issued.
Bulk ballots prepared by Creative personnel containing incorrect unit "code" that resulted in valid votes being excluded and total percentages being incorrect.
Instances where the underlying ownership records, proxies, and sign-in documentation support counting a vote that was excluded from the tally.

These discrepancies collectively affect a significant percentage of the vote and, in our view, materially impact the accuracy of the announced results.

We remain willing to meet and review the specific documentation supporting each discrepancy. Please provide several dates and times this week when you are available to do so.

Thank you,

he responds... "I need specifics, not generalities. Identify each proxy and your objection."

we then spent 15 hours starting from scratch, and had every single disputed ballot with an explanation and a copy of the actual proxie or ballot.


🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here