JimH29 (Florida)
Posts: 56
Posts: 56
Posted:
Our Association documents state that the our Association “shall” appoint members of the Association to “serve at the pleasure of the Board” on an Architectural Review Committee. Docs say that a minimum of three members be appointed to the ARC.
The BOD choose to disband the ARC at their last meeting as the President did not “like the direction that the ARC had taken”.
Neither did many of the Association members agree with the direction, or lack of enforcement unilaterally against the most common abuses that the current ARC was taking.
A few of us put forth a list of members of the Association to step up to fulfill this vital role.
It was rejected by the OD president outright.
What would you consider our alternatives at this point?
Thanking you in advance for your insights.
The BOD choose to disband the ARC at their last meeting as the President did not “like the direction that the ARC had taken”.
Neither did many of the Association members agree with the direction, or lack of enforcement unilaterally against the most common abuses that the current ARC was taking.
A few of us put forth a list of members of the Association to step up to fulfill this vital role.
It was rejected by the OD president outright.
What would you consider our alternatives at this point?
Thanking you in advance for your insights.