DawnL (California)
Posts: 37
Posts: 37
Posted:
I had thought that "disclosure" was all that is necessary to prevent the Board from "legal trouble" if there is a perceived conflict-of-interest. I based this opinion on a California/legal/HOA website that I enjoy. It says:
"Conflict of Interest - if this is in fact occurring, it could mean serious consequences, and is also a legally actionable cause of action. However, sometimes when owners believe actual conflicts of interest exist, the requirements for pursuing a claim are not there. If a board member benefits financially from some action of the board (approval of a contract with the board member's family member or company might be an example), it is not a conflict of interest if it is disclosed."
We have a board member who believes, that since we are a non-profit corporation, and we are governed by non-profit law. . .that we need to formulate an official "conflict of interst policy" as required by the IRS for non-profits. She is concerned that disclosure of the conflict of interest (e.g. "That painting bid is my husband's) is not enough. She also believes that abstention from voting is required and that we need to formulate a specific "conflict of interest" policy to prevent possible future litigation.
(Our bylaws, CCR's do not REQUIRE an abstention from voting for any perceived conflict of interest, although past Board members have abstained just out of courtesy.)
With only three Board members remaining (the rest of the owners are ineligible), having an abstaining Board member will create a problem.
Anyone else have an "official" conflict of interest policy? or have any knowledge about what part of the law would speak to this?
Thanks!
Dawn
"Conflict of Interest - if this is in fact occurring, it could mean serious consequences, and is also a legally actionable cause of action. However, sometimes when owners believe actual conflicts of interest exist, the requirements for pursuing a claim are not there. If a board member benefits financially from some action of the board (approval of a contract with the board member's family member or company might be an example), it is not a conflict of interest if it is disclosed."
We have a board member who believes, that since we are a non-profit corporation, and we are governed by non-profit law. . .that we need to formulate an official "conflict of interst policy" as required by the IRS for non-profits. She is concerned that disclosure of the conflict of interest (e.g. "That painting bid is my husband's) is not enough. She also believes that abstention from voting is required and that we need to formulate a specific "conflict of interest" policy to prevent possible future litigation.
(Our bylaws, CCR's do not REQUIRE an abstention from voting for any perceived conflict of interest, although past Board members have abstained just out of courtesy.)
With only three Board members remaining (the rest of the owners are ineligible), having an abstaining Board member will create a problem.
Anyone else have an "official" conflict of interest policy? or have any knowledge about what part of the law would speak to this?
Thanks!
Dawn