💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AnneB6 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Hello,

I know this topic has come up often, but I couldn’t find anything that fits my situation. I serve on the board of a 12-unit condo, where more than a third of the units are rentals.
We've had problems with vandalism. Although we think we know who is responsible, we are unable to prove it, and no one is speaking up.

Our cleaning and repair costs (common areas) have gone up significantly since these tenants moved in, and one issue nearly caused damage to the building.
We have sent several notices to the owner and a copy to the tenants, but they have not responded. The unit does not seem to be kept up, as evidenced by the windows and patio.

The owner apparently doesn't care what happens in the unit because they bought it as an investment. You would think they would want to take care of their investment.
We have considered installing cameras, but we do not need an added expense at this time. Besides, if having the cameras proves who's responsible, we still have no recourse, since we can't impose fines on the tenants. We only have the option of fining the owner unless we revise our documents to give us more control over the tenants.

I would appreciate your feedback.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
As you pointed out, you do not have control over the tenants.
The owners are responsible for the behavior of their tenants but may not be able to break the lease.

If allowed, applying monetary penalties to an owner can be effective.
As you said, you need proof.

My advice:

1) contact police so there is outside documentation of any damage
2) Cameras are a minimal expense and you will likely need to install them to hope to prove anything.
3) A 30 min. consultation with the Association attorney may provide additional options.

SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
You will need proof if you suspect these tenants, so send an announcement to all the owners asking them to report if they see anything. In this instance, you can say reporters will remain anonymous unless and until legal action is taken (because they'll need to testify as to what they saw and heard). Some people may have Ring cameras on their door and might have picked up something, so owners could send time and date stamped photos as well - that may be all the proof you need if the camera catches them or anyone else in the act.

I know surveillance cameras are expensive, but if your costs have increased, homeowners also need to know that - tell them this will continue and ultimately affect assessments unless everyone works together to get a handle on it. If that includes getting surveillance cameras, have at it (they may even go along with that because they don't want the rest of their expenses to increase).

You don't have to say who you suspect, but owner-landlords should be reminded that THEY are ultimately responsible for the behavior of their tenants and can be held liable for damages. Since this announcement will go to everyone, the owner-landlord responsible for this crap can't say he or she is being singled out.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 1,335
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AnneB6 on 08/26/2025 12:08 PM
... we can't impose fines on the tenants. We only have the option of fining the owner unless we revise our documents to give us more control over the tenants.
Your Declaration almost assuredly allows the association to bill the owners of the unit for damage the owners (implied: via their tenants) cause. Study the Declaration closely and find this section.

If you are under the Massachusetts Condominium Act, then the latter statute permits the association to bill the owners for damage the tenants cause. See https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartII/TitleI/Chapter183A/Section6

Your Declaration should say whether it is subject to this statute or not.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 1,335
Posted:
... In addition, if this association is subject to the Mass Condo Act, then the statute allows the HOA to impose fines. See Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 183A, Section 10(b)(5) . There are caveats to this, though, set by case law.

Based on what you posted, I think your board needs to consult a HOA attorney. Given the number of rentals, the education the HOA attorney will provide will be worth every penny.
AnneB6 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Thank you, Tim and Shelia, for your suggestions. I agree that we need to gather evidence before moving forward.

The other board members agree that getting the owners involved is a good idea, as they can remain anonymous. 

Also, consulting with an attorney will be helpful to ensure we're taking the correct steps if we decide to pursue legal action.
AnneB6 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 08/27/2025 7:17 AM
... In addition, if this association is subject to the Mass Condo Act, then the statute allows the HOA to impose fines. See Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 183A, Section 10(b)(5) . There are caveats to this, though, set by case law.

Based on what you posted, I think your board needs to consult a HOA attorney. Given the number of rentals, the education the HOA attorney will provide will be worth every penny.

I'll take a look at the Mass Condo Act.

Thanks.
LetA (Nevada)
Posts: 2,679
Posted:
Anne, Is the problem something you can get the help of your local code enforcement? Sometimes
it's easier to let code enforcement turn the screws on the unit owner and the board can continue to fine
and assess damages to the unit owner.
NA1 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 190
Posted:
pay attention to the case law too, not just 183A, as ElleN points out. 183A is a bit spare in places and MA has a lot of case law related to it.

You will need a schedule of fines, if you don't already have one. It can be pretty general, as long as it fits your association's trust documents.

Also pay attention to the rules around super liens. Unless it's changed recently, MA doesn't differentiate between types of money owed. A fine is just another fee, just like an association fee. So if the owner refuses to pay fines and you follow the super lien rules, you can cause some pain, especially if there's a mortgage and they get notified about the lien. See https://www.floodlaw.net/collecting-overdue-condominium-fees-in-massachusetts/

MichaelS56 (Minnesota)
Posts: 859
Posted:
Do a special assessment on all owners for the repairs of the common area damage. Since no one will speak up everyone should pay for the unexpected damage and costs. There will be serious reaction by the owners about how unfair this assessment is but keeping the common area repaired is a board expectation. If the Board needs attorney time or as others have said install cameras, again this is a special assessment to recover costs. The condo needs to be safe and free from vandalism.
AnneB6 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 10
Posted:

I greatly appreciate everyone's input. It will take time, but I believe I am making some progress.
AnneB6 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 10
Posted:
We’ve made some progress since my last update, though we still have a long way to go. We hired an attorney to recover the overdue fees. Since the owner had to pay the legal costs, we were very pleased. We still don’t know who caused the vandalism, but at least nothing new has happened. However, we did install one camera, but there has not been any inappropriate activity since it was installed. We also spoke with the attorney about updating our bylaws. Provisions will include limiting rental units, prohibiting subletting, implementing a smoking policy, and updating window dressing rules, as black, red, and torn bedspreads are inappropriate. We will be including a few others before it is finalized.
Unfortunately, evicting tenants is only allowed in extreme cases, and then with a court order. So, all we can do is monitor the tenants and report issues to the owner. Finally, with the assistance of our attorney, we are pursuing the owner for a portion of the water bill costs.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Thank you for the update.

I expect that when you say Bylaws you mean the CC&Rs because to withstand a court challenge, rental restrictions would have to be in the CC&Rs.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here