JohnC73 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 344
Posts: 344
Posted:
I'm curious how other associations handle their "directed proxies" ? After a multi-year battle in New Hampshire over the use of directed proxies I was able to the state condo laws clarified to make it clear that owners can use a directed proxy if they chose to do so.
There is a provision in the new law shown below stating that the Board is to ensure election integrity of the vote and I feel that the board should collect any directed proxy like a ballot at the beginning of a voting meeting.
how to others handle directed proxies? Do you treat them like a ballot and have the secretary or election team collect them, so they can't be tampered with?
IV. (a) The votes appertaining to any unit may be cast in person at a properly noticed meeting of the unit owners' association or pursuant to a directed or undirected proxy or proxies duly executed by or on behalf of the unit owner, or, in cases where the unit owner is more than one person, by or on behalf of all such persons. The option of a directed or undirected proxy shall be the choice of the unit owner. In a condominium association of more than 20 units, proxies cast by any person shall not exceed 10 percent of the votes cast, provided that condominium bylaws that specify less than 10 percent of proxies cast shall apply. In a condominium association of less than 20 units, proxies cast by any person shall not represent a majority of the votes. The board of directors or the association secretary shall implement a process to ensure the integrity of all votes cast in person or by directed or undirected proxy in order to properly register the votes cast.
Thanks
John