BillD16 (Texas)
Posts: 971
Posts: 971
Posted:
Our Board has decided to ban STRs from the neighborhood, claiming that they are businesses and thus not allowed.
Our governing docs contain exactly two items remotely related to the topic:
Not much there. I believe that Tarr v. Timberwood Park Ownrs Ass'n, 556 S.W.3d 274, 279 (Tex.2018) calls bullshit on STRs being businesses.
It seems to me like all our HOA can do is attempt to amend the CCRs with a 67% owner vote (not likely). *shrug* or am I wrong?
[I have zero interest in STRs. My interest in this matter is primarily because I don't want to see the HOA waste a lot of money defending / losing a lawsuit. Plus I think it's stupid for the HOA to even take this on, since it is the latest salvo in a neighbor-neighbor dispute. And the City of Austin has already regulated the hell out of the STR industry around here].
{1} https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/supreme-court/2018/16-1005.html#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20reversed%2C%20holding,violate%20the%20restrictive%20covenants%20by
Bill
Our governing docs contain exactly two items remotely related to the topic:
CCRs: 4.1 General. The Property shall be improved and used solely for single-family residential use, including related or ancillery uses approved by Declarant, including Common Areas, utility easements, and recreational facilities. "Single-family" shall mean a group of persons related by blood, marriage or adoption and shall also include foster children and domestic servants.
R&Rs: 1. To the extent leasing is authorize under other dedicatory instruments, in addition to any other information required by any dedicatory instrument to be provided regarding leasing, the following infomration must e provided to the Association within sever days of the owner entering into any lease for the owner's property:
- contact information (name, address, etc).
- commencement date and term of lease.
Not much there. I believe that Tarr v. Timberwood Park Ownrs Ass'n, 556 S.W.3d 274, 279 (Tex.2018) calls bullshit on STRs being businesses.
It seems to me like all our HOA can do is attempt to amend the CCRs with a 67% owner vote (not likely). *shrug* or am I wrong?
[I have zero interest in STRs. My interest in this matter is primarily because I don't want to see the HOA waste a lot of money defending / losing a lawsuit. Plus I think it's stupid for the HOA to even take this on, since it is the latest salvo in a neighbor-neighbor dispute. And the City of Austin has already regulated the hell out of the STR industry around here].
{1} https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/supreme-court/2018/16-1005.html#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20reversed%2C%20holding,violate%20the%20restrictive%20covenants%20by
Bill
HOA Board ex-President
Austin, Texas USA
âYou canât put too much water in a nuclear reactorâ
Austin, Texas USA
âYou canât put too much water in a nuclear reactorâ