šŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JohnA32 (New Jersey)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Our Board of Trustees is in the process of gathering pricing to change the decor of our club house. We have a policy (copy below) that requires any projects concerned with alterations etc. in excess of $5,000 requires a majority vote of the home owners. The Boards position is a vote is not necessary because the project is funded from reserves. My understanding is the policy references a project and makes no exception for the manner in which it is funded.

ARTICLE XI - ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS BY THE ASSOCIATION Whenever, in the judgment of the Board, the Common Property requires improvements costing in excess of $5,000.00, said improvements shall not be made unless they have been approved by a majority of votes at a meeting of the Association at which a quorum is present. When said approval has been obtained, all Owners shall be assessed for the cost thereof as a Common Expense. In the event of any emergency which could cause damage to any portion of the Common Property, the Board may expend sums in excess of $ 5,000.00 to protect the Common Property and the judgment of the Board shall be final.

SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
What type of improvements is the board proposing? Do the documents define what constitutes an addition, alteration or improvement? Do the documents list whats defined as a reserve expense?

That could make a difference in the answer. For example, if we're talking about repainting the clubhouse because it's been, say, 15 years since it was built and now there are paint chips everywhere, I might agree this is a reserve expense that doesn't require a homeowner vote.

On the other hand, expanding the size of the restrooms to add handicapped stalls, installing a wheelchair ramp for the door and perhaps lowering cabinets for easier access might warrant a homeowner vote because that's an addition.

You might also take a look at your last reserve study to see what it says about projects the association must will plan for and consider if these decor proposals fall within those categories.

With todays prices, I think it could get a bit cumbersome to call for a homeowner vote every time every time a project exceeds $5K - doesn't take much to beat that threshold. The size of your community, its age and extent of what makes up the common areas are also factors that can influence the answer. Maybe it's time to amend the documents to define what constitutes an alteration, improvement or addition, and change the threshold of what requires a homeowner vote. Amending the documents will, of course, require homeowner approval.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 1,338
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnA32 on 06/24/2025 5:37 PM
Our Board of Trustees is in the process of gathering pricing to change the decor of our club house. We have a policy (copy below)
What you quoted is almost certainly a covenant. A covenant is much more legally binding than a "policy." It is a contractual term that a court can enforce.

Quote:
Posted By JohnA32 on 06/24/2025 5:37 PM
that requires any projects concerned with alterations etc. in excess of $5,000 requires a majority vote of the home owners. The Boards position is a vote is not necessary because the project is funded from reserves.
I agree with you. I see nothing that says a project funded from reserves is exempt from Article XI.

The wisest, most legally bullet-proof choice here is to have the owners vote.

If the Board is torn on how to proceed, get the advice of a HOA attorney. Especially if they (misguidedly) see Article XI as a "policy."
BryonW (Massachusetts)
Posts: 55
Posted:
Hi John, sometimes the legal definition of an "improvement" only means adding a NEW feature that was not there before - like the example Sheila gave about expanding the restrooms.

If that is the type of definition that you are working under, then "improvement" probably does not include maintenance or replacement of features that already exist.

In addition to searching your docs for a definition of "improvement", also search your docs for things like maintenance and repair of common areas. For example, in my condo docs, the trustees have the authority to:

"... manage, maintain, repair, restore, and improve Common Areas and Facilities..." (with a vote of the trustees only - not a vote of the homeowners)

One technical note - if you are dealing with old condo docs that were scanned, and you cannot "CTRL F" to search within the docs, you can fix this by using a tool called OCR. Just do a google search for "free OCR". There are a number of websites where you upload the PDF, it works its magic, and it comes back as a doc that is fully searchable!
JohnA32 (New Jersey)
Posts: 9
Posted:
There is no further explanation as to what constitutes a repair or alteration. We do have an engineering report that is updated every 3 years. The report provides a complete inventory,estimated useful and replacement cost. The key is useful life which is based on age and condition. Changing decor is a matter of taste. In that regard as noted previously my concern is whats to prevent a new board to change decor two/three years later. It has already happened to us.
In 2010 the Board obtained approval to completely remodel the clubhouse. The project included gutting walls etc. The project was overwhelmingly approved for $250,000.The money came from the developer. The project actual costĀ  was closer to $400,000 but no one was aware of this as the money came from reserve.Ā 
5 years later 3 board members not running for reelection did not like the decor and spent another $180k. I did not challenge the use of funds at that time because I was told the cost would be just $25k to repaint. Here again no one was fully aware of the true cost becauseĀ  the money came from reserves that came from a special assessment of $300 per home due to excessive snow removal.

DeanJ
Posts: 1,786
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnA32 on 06/24/2025 5:37 PM
Our Board of Trustees is in the process of gathering pricing to change the decor of our club house. We have a policy (copy below) that requires any projects concerned with alterations etc. in excess of $5,000 requires a majority vote of the home owners. The Boards position is a vote is not necessary because the project is funded from reserves. My understanding is the policy references a project and makes no exception for the manner in which it is funded.

ARTICLE XI - ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS BY THE ASSOCIATION Whenever, in the judgment of the Board, the Common Property requires improvements costing in excess of $5,000.00, said improvements shall not be made unless they have been approved by a majority of votes at a meeting of the Association at which a quorum is present. When said approval has been obtained, all Owners shall be assessed for the cost thereof as a Common Expense. In the event of any emergency which could cause damage to any portion of the Common Property, the Board may expend sums in excess of $ 5,000.00 to protect the Common Property and the judgment of the Board shall be final.


The article is not applicable to your situation. Replacing existing furniture, window coverings, paint ect with like items is not an addition, alteration or improvement. It’s basic maintenance.
JohnA32 (New Jersey)
Posts: 9
Posted:
The Board is looking to change the decor of the main clubhouse building some rooms have not been painted in 10 years others less than 2 years.
We have an engineering study performed every 3 years to update our reserve fund for replacements the report provides a detailed inventory of community assets (facilities, furniture, equipment), their useful life, associated costs, and recommended replacement schedules. The Board in conjunction with committees may elect to defer a replacement based on the condition of the facility, furniture of equipment.
We have had some good and bad experiences with Boards summarized below
In 2009 the Board formed a series of committees to determine the best use of $250,000 received from the builder. The board/committees narrowed the options to two choices: enclose the patio or completely remodel the clubhouse.
Remodeling the clubhouse was overwhelmingly approved by 87% of home owners. It was a community project in every sense of the word. The project actual costĀ  was closer to $400,000 with the decision to cover the additional cost from reserve given the scope of the project was detailed and approved by the community.
In 2010, the community approved a special assessment of $300 per home to replenish the reserve fund after snow removal cost overruns. Maintenance fees continued to rise, despite the assessment.

Just five years later in 2015 with a majority of the Board not running for reelection the Board decided to change the decor and went ahead and spent another $180k without seeking approval or advising the community as to the scope of the renovations. This decision, was justified by the Board as being within their authority because the funding came from reserves, led to alterations such as painting over the expensive teak wood ceiling in the great room.

The issues is not the merits of the proposed makeover but the rights of the members to approve the project. The boards position is no approval is necessary because the money will come from the reserve fund.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Are you talking about yet another project the board wants to do now or the $180k they spent in 2015?

Part of the problem is that the math didn't math and there was no explanation as to why after 2010. I understand why the reserves needed replenishing because of the snowfall, but the homeowners should have been told what the board wanted and why. Instead they appeared to use the reserves as some sort of slush fund instead of doing the harder job of reviewing the snow removal line item to adjust to higher costs and adjust the operating budget (and assessments) accordingly.

That may also be be why most of the board stepped down because they knew someone would start asking questions and they didn't want to be in the hot seat. This is why some boards wind up getting recalled, as they should. Reserves should never be used to cover deficits in the operating budget and assessments should be adjusted according to inflation because everything costs more in 2025 compared to 2010 or 2015.

If you're concerned about what happened 10 years ago, I understand why and if you're concerned the current board wants to do the same thing. You can't change what happened to the $180K, but now is a great time to take a good look at this part of the documents because some definitions on what constitutes an addition, replacement, etc., is needed. You may also need a formal policy on when and how reserves should be be used. That can also include changing the amount dictating homeowner approval.

To get things started, bring your concerns to the next board meeting with a written summary of what's happened in the last 10 years and ask them to commission a special committee to review reserve spending ans maje recommendations on policy, amending the documents, etc. Bring back your neighbors with you so they hear the response. If they balk, check the documents to see w h at needs to be e done to call a special homeowners meeting to discuss this - and if that leads to another meeting to determine if these folks should be replaced, do your thing.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
JohnA32 (New Jersey)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Thank you that is exactly what I am trying to do get the Board to bring the request to the communityThanks again

šŸŽÆ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • āœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • āœ“ Share your experience
  • āœ“ Get expert advice
  • āœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here