BryonW (Massachusetts)
Posts: 55
Posts: 55
Posted:
During our most recent insurance renewal, the insurance agent told us that it is NOT in the association's best interest to shop around for multiple insurance quotes. Instead he suggested that we just renew with our current carrier.
Naturally, my first reaction is that he is just making up BS, because he is a commission salesperson, and he wants to avoid losing our account to a competitor.
However, he gave some detailed reasons, which seem plausible. Wondering what folks here think of his given reasons... BS or valid?
1) Loss ratio: the more years you are with a single underwriter, the more your total lifetime premiums you have paid to that carrier, and then if you have a claim, your loss ration as a % will be lower. Example:
Association's premium is $30,000/year. Have been with the same carrier for 5 years, so total premiums paid = 30,000 x 5 = $150,000. Then if the association has a $50,000 claim, the loss ration is $50,000 / $150,000 = 33%.
Compared to a scenario where you have the same claim, but, have only been with your carrier for 1 year. Now loss ratio is $50,000 / $30,000 = 166%. And you are likely to get non-renewed because that ratio is too high.
2) Less likely to quote: when an underwriter sees an account that has changed frequently, it goes to the bottom of their pile, and the association runs a risk of not getting any quote at all.
3) He says that accounts who have been with 1 underwriter for many years get better rates than accounts that are new.
Thanks for any insight!
Naturally, my first reaction is that he is just making up BS, because he is a commission salesperson, and he wants to avoid losing our account to a competitor.
However, he gave some detailed reasons, which seem plausible. Wondering what folks here think of his given reasons... BS or valid?
1) Loss ratio: the more years you are with a single underwriter, the more your total lifetime premiums you have paid to that carrier, and then if you have a claim, your loss ration as a % will be lower. Example:
Association's premium is $30,000/year. Have been with the same carrier for 5 years, so total premiums paid = 30,000 x 5 = $150,000. Then if the association has a $50,000 claim, the loss ration is $50,000 / $150,000 = 33%.
Compared to a scenario where you have the same claim, but, have only been with your carrier for 1 year. Now loss ratio is $50,000 / $30,000 = 166%. And you are likely to get non-renewed because that ratio is too high.
2) Less likely to quote: when an underwriter sees an account that has changed frequently, it goes to the bottom of their pile, and the association runs a risk of not getting any quote at all.
3) He says that accounts who have been with 1 underwriter for many years get better rates than accounts that are new.
Thanks for any insight!