RoseM11 (West Virginia)
Posts: 7
Posts: 7
Posted:
Hello,
During the budget discussion at our Annual Meeting a member being very, very assertive pointed out a person on the Board was "untrustworthy - dishonest" because he had mailed a one-page document using an envelope and a postage stamp from his personal work office. We are a tiny self-managed community, no letterhead, no envelopes, no printer ... nothing. So the meeting minutes were done, approved by the Board, then sent out to the members. The complainer became upset again because the Board did not include her complaint - now all of us are considered dishonest. Note: The Board member said he does have to pay a monthly administrative fee at his office for things like envelopes/stamps. QUESTION: Were we "supposed" to include her complaint in the minutes? We heard, we listened, that Board member also apologized in the meeting and said would not do it again. We found the complaint very petty and unfair. Though technically wrong, the Board member thought he was doing a good thing by mailing her document quickly (he also works out of state). The complainer won't move on now and is emailing the development that the Board is dishonest.
During the budget discussion at our Annual Meeting a member being very, very assertive pointed out a person on the Board was "untrustworthy - dishonest" because he had mailed a one-page document using an envelope and a postage stamp from his personal work office. We are a tiny self-managed community, no letterhead, no envelopes, no printer ... nothing. So the meeting minutes were done, approved by the Board, then sent out to the members. The complainer became upset again because the Board did not include her complaint - now all of us are considered dishonest. Note: The Board member said he does have to pay a monthly administrative fee at his office for things like envelopes/stamps. QUESTION: Were we "supposed" to include her complaint in the minutes? We heard, we listened, that Board member also apologized in the meeting and said would not do it again. We found the complaint very petty and unfair. Though technically wrong, the Board member thought he was doing a good thing by mailing her document quickly (he also works out of state). The complainer won't move on now and is emailing the development that the Board is dishonest.