CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Good day, all!
The board in my community has an interesting decision to make. If we were still with our old law firm, I'd do a free 15-minute phone call to verify that we're thinking about this correctly. But we're not with them, and our current law firm would charge us.
So... the situation: We were approached by a local internet service company (Company A) that is upgrading their fiber optic lines in the area. Their current internet service still partly uses the old phone system wiring, and it can't keep up with the demand. The company offered to install all of the necessary fiber optic "stuff" in our community - for free. Their justification is that they will pick up enough customers in our community to justify the expense. I suspect that this is true. I've also heard scuttlebutt that the local cable company is also moving to fiber optics, and I suspect that Company A approached us to get in ahead of them.
Here's what I'm thinking about, and please tell me if you disagree with any of it.
* This internet service falls under the umbrella of the Telecommunications Act.
* Is this a material upgrade that requires homeowner approval? Or is it no different from any utility that has to upgrade its wiring (eg.: the electrical company installing smart meters on our buildings)?
* A number of residents currently get their internet service through Company A. They would have to upgrade their service if fiber optics is installed in the community. But it sounds like they will eventually have to find other options anyway as their current systems become increasingly unable to handle web traffic.
* Company A will install fiber optic cable in the ground and on the buildings. This will cause disruption and damage to the common elements, which they will repair on their own dime. I'm concerned for a number of reasons, one of which is a temperamental detention pond that's taken us ten years to get it working properly.
* What happens when the cable company also wants to install fiber optics in my area? Can we say yes to one company and no to the other? I think we can - but that means we're basically picking technology solutions for the community. (Thank heaven the local wireless providers offer internet connections via wireless.)
* Our community rules prohibit installation of satellite dishes on roofs and the sides of buildings. Fiber optic installation will include stuff on the buildings. The board has the authority to allow this - but are there any inconsistencies in this? So far we haven't had to deal with this question since internet connections come through builder-installed wiring in the community.
* I recently switched internet providers from the local cable company to Company A. The service is good, but the customer support/back office stuff is bad enough that I'm probably going to go back to the cable company. If Company A becomes our "preferred provider", I'm concerned that owners will hold us responsible for Company A's poor customer service even though we have nothing to do with it.
* One good thing: fiber optics may encourage our current satellite dish users to get rid of them, which will improve the looks of the community.
* If technology will force us to go this route eventually, it makes sense to do it now while Company A is motivated to keep us happy. But I fear that their motivation will end once we've signed the contract. I don't want to go with Company A just because they got to us first.
* We've asked our community manager if board members in the communities who've gone this route will talk to us about their experiences. We'd also like to visit the communities to see what the building installations look like.
Summary of concerns:
* Current customers of Company A will be forced to upgrade their service or find other options. Customers of other internet providers may feel forced to go with Company A, even though in theory it's their choice.
* Damage to common elements and inconvenience to residents.
* Company A's poor customer service. I won't vote against this just because of my experiences with them. But another board member and I did some research on the web, and there are many complaints that say the same thing. (Quote: "Company A has accomplished something that I didn't think was possible: they've made the cable company look good.")
I think this last one is my biggest concern. I don't trust them - incompetence and misbehavior boil down to the same thing for customers.
The board in my community has an interesting decision to make. If we were still with our old law firm, I'd do a free 15-minute phone call to verify that we're thinking about this correctly. But we're not with them, and our current law firm would charge us.
So... the situation: We were approached by a local internet service company (Company A) that is upgrading their fiber optic lines in the area. Their current internet service still partly uses the old phone system wiring, and it can't keep up with the demand. The company offered to install all of the necessary fiber optic "stuff" in our community - for free. Their justification is that they will pick up enough customers in our community to justify the expense. I suspect that this is true. I've also heard scuttlebutt that the local cable company is also moving to fiber optics, and I suspect that Company A approached us to get in ahead of them.
Here's what I'm thinking about, and please tell me if you disagree with any of it.
* This internet service falls under the umbrella of the Telecommunications Act.
* Is this a material upgrade that requires homeowner approval? Or is it no different from any utility that has to upgrade its wiring (eg.: the electrical company installing smart meters on our buildings)?
* A number of residents currently get their internet service through Company A. They would have to upgrade their service if fiber optics is installed in the community. But it sounds like they will eventually have to find other options anyway as their current systems become increasingly unable to handle web traffic.
* Company A will install fiber optic cable in the ground and on the buildings. This will cause disruption and damage to the common elements, which they will repair on their own dime. I'm concerned for a number of reasons, one of which is a temperamental detention pond that's taken us ten years to get it working properly.
* What happens when the cable company also wants to install fiber optics in my area? Can we say yes to one company and no to the other? I think we can - but that means we're basically picking technology solutions for the community. (Thank heaven the local wireless providers offer internet connections via wireless.)
* Our community rules prohibit installation of satellite dishes on roofs and the sides of buildings. Fiber optic installation will include stuff on the buildings. The board has the authority to allow this - but are there any inconsistencies in this? So far we haven't had to deal with this question since internet connections come through builder-installed wiring in the community.
* I recently switched internet providers from the local cable company to Company A. The service is good, but the customer support/back office stuff is bad enough that I'm probably going to go back to the cable company. If Company A becomes our "preferred provider", I'm concerned that owners will hold us responsible for Company A's poor customer service even though we have nothing to do with it.
* One good thing: fiber optics may encourage our current satellite dish users to get rid of them, which will improve the looks of the community.
* If technology will force us to go this route eventually, it makes sense to do it now while Company A is motivated to keep us happy. But I fear that their motivation will end once we've signed the contract. I don't want to go with Company A just because they got to us first.
* We've asked our community manager if board members in the communities who've gone this route will talk to us about their experiences. We'd also like to visit the communities to see what the building installations look like.
Summary of concerns:
* Current customers of Company A will be forced to upgrade their service or find other options. Customers of other internet providers may feel forced to go with Company A, even though in theory it's their choice.
* Damage to common elements and inconvenience to residents.
* Company A's poor customer service. I won't vote against this just because of my experiences with them. But another board member and I did some research on the web, and there are many complaints that say the same thing. (Quote: "Company A has accomplished something that I didn't think was possible: they've made the cable company look good.")
I think this last one is my biggest concern. I don't trust them - incompetence and misbehavior boil down to the same thing for customers.