DeanG3 (California)
Posts: 4
Posts: 4
Posted:
Hello,
I am a resident of a condominium complex in Altadena, CA. As you probably know, pretty much all Altadena, with a few exceptions, burned down. Luckily, we were one of the very few who still have a home.
Β
We've been living outside our condo for several months, already, while mold and water damage to the structure was being remediated.
This condition was caused by water intrusion into our unit.
for several years we asked the Board to check into this water intrusion, and they replaced the entire building roof twice in a period of 7 years. This action did not take care of the water leak issue.
About 4 years ago, during a rainy week, we informed the board that we were having a leak, and they called the roofing company that replaced our roof. The roofer told me that the problem was not with the roof, but due to the poor condition of the stucco wall which had countless cracks.
We informed the board, the board continued ignoring our requests until about 2 years ago, when we threatened them with legal action. At that point, the board hired a contractor to perform a water test, the test determined that the problem was the wall and not the windows, although they recommended replacing them.
About 6 months ago, they hired a contractor to begin work fixing the wall and remediating the damage to the inside or our unit and the other 3 units in my building.
After the drywall was completely stripped, the contractor the board hired, without knowing the history of maintenance to the outside of the building, the countless cracks on the stucco, even a 1/2" x 12" hole at the base of the stucco wall, which light can be seen from the inside of our condo unit, he told the board members that the problem was with the windows. At this point the board members changed their position about covering the cost of repairing the wall, casting blame on our windows. Unlike the previous contractor that performed a water test to formulate a report, the new contractor made this determination without performing a water test.
The board hired a lawyer, months had gone by of arguing about whose fault it is. The board kept delaying the project and we've been living in a rental property for 6 months.
Fast forward to January after the fire, We ran out of money, so regardless of whose fault it is, we decided to get our own windows as required by our CCRs. The board had sent us an agreement to pay for the windows, with a price as twice as high than what the contractor we wanted to hire quoted us, and the HOA Board contractor said that whoever contractor we hire to replace our windows, would have to assume liability for the work he already completed.
We feel that their contractor's position, although valid, reduces our chance to find another contractor to replace our windows, as no contractor would want to assume another contractor liability, and the HOA is forcing us to agree to pay an outrageous price for the replacement or our windows to which we never agreed.
We've asked 2 other contractors, and their estimated price confirms that contractor that the board hired quoted a very high price. Has the board failed their fiduciary duties for not checking with at least another contractor for better pricing to help homeowners save money? Their decision of hiring a contractor that puts us in a situation, in which it leaves us with little or no choice but to hire him and pay what he demands legal?
I much appreciate your feedback
Sorry for the lengthy story, it may be confusing, but it has many levels of complications.
DG
I am a resident of a condominium complex in Altadena, CA. As you probably know, pretty much all Altadena, with a few exceptions, burned down. Luckily, we were one of the very few who still have a home.
Β
We've been living outside our condo for several months, already, while mold and water damage to the structure was being remediated.
This condition was caused by water intrusion into our unit.
for several years we asked the Board to check into this water intrusion, and they replaced the entire building roof twice in a period of 7 years. This action did not take care of the water leak issue.
About 4 years ago, during a rainy week, we informed the board that we were having a leak, and they called the roofing company that replaced our roof. The roofer told me that the problem was not with the roof, but due to the poor condition of the stucco wall which had countless cracks.
We informed the board, the board continued ignoring our requests until about 2 years ago, when we threatened them with legal action. At that point, the board hired a contractor to perform a water test, the test determined that the problem was the wall and not the windows, although they recommended replacing them.
About 6 months ago, they hired a contractor to begin work fixing the wall and remediating the damage to the inside or our unit and the other 3 units in my building.
After the drywall was completely stripped, the contractor the board hired, without knowing the history of maintenance to the outside of the building, the countless cracks on the stucco, even a 1/2" x 12" hole at the base of the stucco wall, which light can be seen from the inside of our condo unit, he told the board members that the problem was with the windows. At this point the board members changed their position about covering the cost of repairing the wall, casting blame on our windows. Unlike the previous contractor that performed a water test to formulate a report, the new contractor made this determination without performing a water test.
The board hired a lawyer, months had gone by of arguing about whose fault it is. The board kept delaying the project and we've been living in a rental property for 6 months.
Fast forward to January after the fire, We ran out of money, so regardless of whose fault it is, we decided to get our own windows as required by our CCRs. The board had sent us an agreement to pay for the windows, with a price as twice as high than what the contractor we wanted to hire quoted us, and the HOA Board contractor said that whoever contractor we hire to replace our windows, would have to assume liability for the work he already completed.
We feel that their contractor's position, although valid, reduces our chance to find another contractor to replace our windows, as no contractor would want to assume another contractor liability, and the HOA is forcing us to agree to pay an outrageous price for the replacement or our windows to which we never agreed.
We've asked 2 other contractors, and their estimated price confirms that contractor that the board hired quoted a very high price. Has the board failed their fiduciary duties for not checking with at least another contractor for better pricing to help homeowners save money? Their decision of hiring a contractor that puts us in a situation, in which it leaves us with little or no choice but to hire him and pay what he demands legal?
I much appreciate your feedback
Sorry for the lengthy story, it may be confusing, but it has many levels of complications.
DG