šŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KimberlyH7 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
My Florida HOA has banned recording Zoom meetings, claiming they have the right to establish "reasonable rules" for recordings. They created the new rules after I used a private recording app (MeetGeek.ai) to record a meeting and shared its automated notes with the Property Manager, hoping they’d help her draft better minutes.

Here’s the situation:

- I gave more than 24 hours' notice before recording and asked the HOA to enable Zoom’s recording feature. The Property Manager said it wasn’t available.
- I purchased and used MeetGeek.ai to login to the Zoom meeting and record because weekday midday meetings conflict with my work schedule.
- The meeting minutes are vague and don’t communicate key details or decisions, leaving members uninformed.

At the next HOA BOD meeting, the Property Manager (PM) and BOD implemented new rules, in direct response to my recording:

1. Prohibited virtual recordings entirely, PM saying their attorney advised it was within their rights.
2. Required all Zoom attendees to identify themselves and their units or be removed (we never had issues with non-members logging in).
3. Stated that MeetGeek app isn’t allowed as it is not a "member" even though it shows my name and they know it's my app (they were notified and stated they knew it was mine, never asked any IT Security questions).

They voted these rules in with no Member discussion or visible Board debate during the meeting, even though "Meeting Recording" was listed on the agenda. This suggests they deliberated in private, outside of an open meeting. They do this frequently because I attended 6 monthly meetings and there were frequently "surprise" topics they that no one knew what they were talking about but they did. It's in the private "Board Packet", created by the PM.

They say we're only allowed to record in-person and claim this is their right to ban as part of establishing "reasonable rules regarding recording process". Their own new process of verifying all virtual participants has created far more of a meeting disruption than the recording ever did.

LEGAL QUESTIONS to be answered/defined:

1. Does Florida law allow HOA members to record virtual (Zoom) board meetings, just like in-person meetings?
2. Can a member use a recording app, like MeetGeek.ai, as a proxy to record if they cannot attend or note take?

Please recommend an affordable Florida attorney/firm for guidance. I’ll need handle most of the work myself to save costs. I believe there was another Florida case requiring an HOA to share thier recording with a member (her attorney possibly from Fort Pierce), but I can’t locate it again. I have also read through your case.

I’m in Martin County, Florida.

OTHER ISSUE: BOD is planning to allow electronic voting (great!) and said the Property Manager will be the only ONE allowed to "verify" votes. She has the BIGGEST conflict of interest out of everyone. Newly elected Board members might choose to replace this Property Management Company and Property Manager. It would be in her best interest to only allow "friendly" members to be elected. Do you think she'd want me to be elected? Probably not and I don't see a lot of "Fiduciary Duty" coming from her.

Thanks!
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Kimberly,

A reminder of one of the sites posting rules:

(3) No Mention of Community/Company/Person Names: In order to fairly enforce (2) and prevent liability, we do not allow the mentioning of any community name, company name or product. Please also do not post the full name of any person.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
You may want to do an internet search on the ability to record HOA meetings.
See which ones were written by attorneys and send an email with your question to that attorney.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 1,338
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KimberlyH7 on 11/29/2024 3:24 PM
My Florida HOA has banned recording Zoom meetings, claiming they have the right to establish "reasonable rules" for recordings.
Is this a condominium subject to FS 718?

Whether it is a FS 718 condo or FS 720 HOA, the board does have the right to adopt reasonable rules for recordings. However the good news is that, where the law requires HOAs to allow xyz but also allows the HOA to regulate xyz via "reasonable rules," courts have said,that a flat-out ban on xyz is not reasonable.

Good luck finding an attorney.
KimberlyH7 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 11/29/2024 6:57 PM
Posted By KimberlyH7 on 11/29/2024 3:24 PM
My Florida HOA has banned recording Zoom meetings, claiming they have the right to establish "reasonable rules" for recordings.
Is this a condominium subject to FS 718?

Whether it is a FS 718 condo or FS 720 HOA...

My HOA is bound by Florida Statute 720 HOA, Florida Not For Profit Corporation Act, as well as Association by-laws and rules (of course, Florida laws take precedent over those).

Thanks for asking!
KimberlyH7 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 11/29/2024 3:37 PM
You may want to do an internet search on the ability to record HOA meetings.
See which ones were written by attorneys and send an email with your question to that attorney.

Hi Tim, We have clear laws in Florida. The Florida Homeowners Association Act under Title 40 Chapter 720, which our HOA is governed by, clearly states "(10)ā€ƒRECORDING.—Any parcel owner may tape record or videotape meetings of the board of directors and meetings of the members. The board of directors of the association may adopt reasonable rules governing the taping of meetings of the board and the membership."

This right has been active since 2000 (almost 25 years) in Florida Statute 720.

I am past the personal research phase and am looking for an attorney and Florida court cases that relate to my issue. I would rather find an attorney that has experience and not rely on random blog-posters.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KimberlyH7 on 11/30/2024 5:16 AM

I am past the personal research phase and am looking for an attorney and Florida court cases that relate to my issue. I would rather find an attorney that has experience and not rely on random blog-posters.

Internet searches are not simply for research.
I agree that you should not rely on blog-posters (including those on this forum).
At least, not without doing your own trust but verify research.

If you want an attorney that has won cases against an HOA/COA, then an internet search can reveal cases where the HOA/COA lost and a simple review of the court documents will provide the name of an attorney.

I took 30 seconds and did a search and, based on that search, I believe I found a case that was discussed in another thread on this forum.

Here is a link to an article about the case. Within that article is a link to the full court opinion.

Hope it helps.
DeanJ
Posts: 1,786
Posted:
The easiest way to end recordings of zoom meetings is not more zoom meetings,
KimberlyH7 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
Hi Tim, I do appreciate you trying to help but I am looking for a reference from someone who has personally dealt with an attorney AND it hasn't cost them tens of thousands of $$$. That is why I posted here.
KimberlyH7 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DeanJ on 11/30/2024 8:34 AM
The easiest way to end recordings of zoom meetings is not more zoom meetings,

Agreed. I have thought of this and will ask the attorney, once I have one. What if we get the right to record virtually then, as a result, the HOA stops having virtual meetings? Ultimately, it would be best if large HOA's had to record and post the full meeting recordings for members. There should have to be a timely way to stay informed when members can't attend every single meeting, shouldn't there?
LoriM15 (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
I can see two reasons why your board may be upset at you over these recordings. I understand that you wanted to know what was going on at the meeting and had a conflict. But it looks like you had the app login to the meeting when you weren't even there and remotely record the zoom. So technically they are correct - the app is not a member of the association. I know this is a technicality, but it it is significant. You could go and sit in the room and video or audio record using your phone and they would not be able to do anything about it. But a case against the board for not allowing remote recording like this is not a slam dunk case. Or you could have signed in as yourself and recorded locally to your computer.

Second, you sent them the AI notes to "help" the property manager get the minutes correct. Really? That's a pretty passive aggressive move, telling a property management professional that they may need "help" with the minutes. How do you know they don't audio record the meeting anyway (most of the PMs I know do that).

In my experience, it's not unusual for associations to not save the zoom recording, or if they do they only have it available for review for a few days. Those are reasonable rules. It's just like a records request - the association can set reasonable rules to limit the number or pages or the number of times per month an owner can request documents.

It's clear you have some issues with your association and the PM and you have every right to want to be informed. But you may have to take time off work to attend the meetings in person. An attorney is not going to be cheap - our HOA attorney charges $375 per hour and that's the going rate in this area of SW Florida.
KimberlyH7 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
LoriM15,

Thank you. You have made some great points!!

It is a circular issue... meetings are at 2pm on weekdays, right in the middle of a workday. I missed the last one because I was out of the country and it would've been in the middle of the night.

The meeting minutes are a joke (and released over 30 days after the meeting). This is what our meeting minutes contain (I've changed names and other items for confidentiality, but this is the ACTUAL amount of information shared):

PRESENT IN PERSON: **List of Directors and Property Mgr names that were present.**

PRESENT BY ZOOM: **List of Directors' names who attended virtually.**

CALL TO ORDER: By Sally Smith, President, at 2pm.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES: **from last meeting, lists who voted**

TREASURER’S REPORT:
Adam Adams reviewed the Homeowners Association financials for September.
Operating/Reserve Account Balances and Accounts Receivable were also reviewed.

SECURITY AND SAFETY COMMITTEE:
Jack James, Chair, gave his report. A copy of the minutes was included in the Board packet

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT:
Property manager gave an ARC report. A copy of the ARC minutes was included in the Board packet.

XYX SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT:
John Smith gave a brief report, which included summary of survey results.

COVENANTS COMMITTEE REPORT:
The committee did not meet. Nothing to report.

GOVERNMENT ACTION COMMITTEE REPORT:
Alice Adams, Chair, did not give a report.

HOLIDAY LIGHTING COMMITTEE REPORT:
Sally Smith (BOD President) announced the holiday lights have been installed, and will be set to turn on the day after Thanksgiving.
Sally asked if landscapers would be willing to help check on the lights before they leave for the day, and when they come back in the morning during the week.

TREE & CONCRETE COMMITTEE REPORT:
The committee did not meet. Nothing to report.

Government Action Committee Direction
Approval
Motion: To disband the Government Action Committee.
Made By: John Smith Seconded By: Mary McMahon
Vote: Unanimous Approval

NEW BUSINESS:

Electronic Consent Authorization Form & Board Resolution
Tabled
Motion: To table the agenda item until more information is received.
Made By: Adam Adams Seconded By: Mary McMahon
Vote: Unanimous Approval

Security and Safety Flyer
Approval
Motion: To approve sending out the flyer via email blast, and post to the association's website.
Made By: James Smith Seconded By: Rudy Roth
Vote: Unanimous Approval

Member Comments
Members made comments regarding the Government Action Committee, tennis court cleaning,
and tennis court waste baskets.

Members do not have access to the "Board Packet" frequently mentioned. Many more topics were discussed, and other member comments were made but not recorded. For example, I volunteered to help on the Holiday Lighting Committee, but there's no record of that. There are also no "action items" or follow-ups listed.

Are these typical for HOA meeting minutes? In my professional experience, such minutes would be insufficient even for a regular workplace meeting.

I TRULY believed that using an automated tool might help the Property Mgr create comprehensive minutes. Currently, the Property Manager handles multiple roles during meetings, including giving reports and taking minutes. Our Board Secretary doesn't seem responsible for minutes even though the Secretary is listed as responsible in the HOA by-laws and Florida law. The job can be delegated. The ARC Committee Meeting Minutes are excellent (the committee does them themselves).

Our community has over 400 properties, a full-time Property Manager, a part-time assistant, and a Property Management Company. Many residents volunteer for committees but are never contacted to serve.

The bottom line is we need better access to information. It's challenging to stay informed when meetings are inconvenient for Members to attend, and the records provided are inadequate. Even when I attend, important details are often in "Board Packets" we can't access, and decisions are made without sufficient transparency.

Additionally, there's a proposal to have the Property Manager validate new electronic board member election votes. I'm concerned this could be a conflict of interest, especially if a new Board might consider changing the Property Management Company or Manager. That is what they talked about at the meeting and is listed as "Electronic Consent Authorization Form & Board Resolution" in the above Meeting Minutes. Who would ever know from the Meeting Minutes that they were actually talking about allowing electronic voting and having the PM validate electronic member votes?!

I understand that seeking legal advice may be necessary, and while it can be costly, I believe it's important to address these transparency issues for the benefit of our community. Florida's new laws emphasize HOA transparency, and many residents share these frustrations, as evidenced by increased meeting attendance.

Thank you for your support and any guidance you can offer.

Aside from wait 5-10 years to replace the poor Board members, any other suggestions?

Regarding my legal questions...

Recording Virtual HOA Meetings in Florida:
Florida law grants homeowners association (HOA) members the right to record board meetings. Specifically, Florida Statute §720.306(10) allows members to record meetings of the board of directors and membership meetings with audio and video equipment. While the statute directly references in-person meetings, it does not explicitly address virtual meetings conducted via platforms like Zoom. However, the spirit of the law is to promote transparency, so it's arguable that this right extends to virtual meetings.

Using a Recording App as a Proxy (most likely a separate issue):
The use of a recording app to attend and record a meeting on my behalf is a nuanced issue. Florida law permits members to appoint proxies to attend meetings, but these proxies are typically other individuals who can vote or participate on the member's behalf. A recording app is not a person and may not qualify as a proxy under the law.

Given the complexities and the HOA's resistance, consulting an attorney experienced in Florida HOA law would be beneficial. They could provide guidance specific to my situation and help me understand my rights and options. Sadly, I feel I have hit a wall in trying to work with the Board or PM directly.

I plan to live here another 30 years. Many residents are retired and in their 70s. It is very hard for MANY interested property owners to attend. The main Board positions are filled by Directors who have been on the Board for 6+ years. We purchased here a couple years ago because we liked how things were. We also invested a lot to update our property. Now, they have changed things that are reducing the values of properties, and esthetics of the neighborhood, without the guidance of professionals (architects, etc.).

After attending 8 straight months of meetings, the Board has been completely unresponsive to ALL member requests and interests... One Board member tried to help a member once, another is new but clueless, another just left but I don't have any details on the vacancy because I missed ONE, the last, Board meeting. The member that resigned in October told me I should take his position because I am thoughtful, attend, and communicate well... but I doubt they'll let it happen. They seem VERY defensive, in control, and want to keep it that way. I would be for greater transparency to Members, treating Members with respect and consideration, and against only getting Board Member pet-projects done (those get done quick). Members are told if they want to affect change, they need to volunteer. Then, they volunteer and are never contacted (I've heard this from others, it's not just me). The whole thing is ridiculous.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Proxies are for voting at meetings of the members. They are nir not for meetings of the board, i.e., a board member cannot somehow have a proxy vote for her.

Well, there are hardly any "action "items" on the agenda, apparently, and that's what minutes record--board motions and decisions. I think the survey rusts should have been included.

That the Board discusses items of business AND mis motions and votes on them that were not properly noticed per FL and listed on the. agenda is a big problem, imo.

What do you mean by "main" board positions??? Every director has one vote.

What has been shown on this forum is that owners but get to know other owners who are similarly disturbed by this Board. You All work together to make a strategy & use campaign tactics to vote out some directors a the next election AND have candidates ready to serve on the ballot. It doesn't take many allies to turn the Board over completely in one year. Or even right away.

On our Board of 7, the time we had to "renew" the Board there are 3 seats up for election, we won all three AND 2 of the Board already joined with us immediately giving us a majority.

But, if you're a go-it-alone kids person it will cost you plenty. And perhaps your HOA.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
The minutes you offer are exactly what Associations should be doing.

Minutes are a record of decisions and documentation of actions (committee/financial reports).
Minutes should not be a verbose document of who said what and when.
KimberlyH7 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
Hi KerryL1,

Thank you so much for your response and thoughts.

You are right. A recording app is not a "proxy". It logs in for me and records the virtual meeting. It is not voting or representing me. Maybe a virtual recording app should be no different than using an iPhone app to record a meeting in-person (which is allowed). Also, this is the ONLY legal way to record a virtual meeting (unless Zoom recording has been enabled, which the HOA/PM has declined to do). Zoom is built to kick an attendee off if they are trying to record with another app. It doesn't always work right, but let's face it, sneaking to record a virtual HOA meeting is not ideal.

It's difficult to think of the proper way to coordinate with more HOA Members. I'm not one for public venting on social sites, personal attacks, etc.. It's hard to figure out how to tactfully bring the topic up with other residents in a roughly 450 property neighborhood.

Most members only attend a meeting (virtually or in person) if they have an request or it is a topic they are very interested in and was communicated well, like considering changing the current Telecommunications Provider most were happy with at contract end. The Board did make a real effort communicating that one because, legally, members can vote to overturn the Board's Telecommunication contract decision if they disagree. I don't think Members knew that but I'm sure the Property Management Company and Board did. I know it.

When I refer to the "main" board position roles, I'm referring to the Officers (President, VP, Treasurer, and Secretary). I should've said "Officers".

KimberlyH7 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
TimB4,

Here is a good example of what Meeting Minutes should contain:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MEETING MINUTES
Meeting Date: October 2, 2024
Meeting Time: 9:00 a.m.
Location: ABC Corporation Headquarters, Conference Room C

ATTENDEES:
John Smith, President
Jane Doe, Treasurer
Mary Johnson, Vice President
Mark Baker, Secretary
Emily Green, Director
Sarah Samuels, Director

ABSENTEES:
Dave Daniels, Director

1. Call to Order
John Smith, President, called the meeting to order at 9:03 a.m.

2. Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes
The minutes from the meeting held on September 13, 2024, were reviewed. Mark Baker, Secretary, motioned to approve the minutes, and Sarah Samuels, Director, seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

3. Financial Overview (Presented by Jane Doe, Treasurer)
Q3 Financial Report
Mary Johnson, Vice President, reported a revenue increase of 11% compared to Q2, driven by the successful summer campaign.

Cost Management
Operational costs decreased by 7% due to vendor changes in July.

Next Steps
The finance team will prepare the draft annual budget for 2025. Mary Johnson will present it at the November meeting.

Decision: Mary Johnson, Vice President, motioned to approve a 6% increase in product development initiatives for Q4 to support demand. Emily Green, Director, seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

4. Sales and Marketing
Sales Growth (Presented by Mark Baker, Secretary)
Mark reported a 13% month-over-month increase in sales volume, exceeding the team’s target due to strong demand and performance.

Marketing Campaign Success (Presented by Emily Green, Director)
Emily shared that the summer campaign generated 5,000 new leads with a 9% conversion rate.

Action Items:
Mark Baker: Provide feedback on market expansion strategies by October 15.
Emily Green: Prepare a new digital marketing strategy for Q4.

5. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m. by John Smith, President.

Next Meeting: October 16, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. in Conference Room C.

Action Items Summary
Jane Doe, Treasurer: Provide the 2025 draft budget by the next meeting.
Mark Baker, Secretary: Submit expansion strategy by October 15.
Emily Green, Director: Prepare a Q4 digital marketing strategy for the next meeting.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tim, where are you getting your information on Meeting Minutes from? Proper minutes are more than restating the agenda, BOD attendees, and vote outcomes. For a large HOA like ours (450+ units, a full-time staff, and a significant budget), this approach is insufficient even if it has been .

Effective Meeting Minutes should include:

- Topics Discussed: Clear, accurate summaries of all topics without omissions or misleading phrasing.
- Reports Presented: Highlights of reports shared and their titles for reference.
- Action Items: Decisions made, reasons for tabling items, next steps, and responsible parties.

Minutes should be concise yet detailed enough to document discussions and decisions. Vague or poorly titled items fail to inform stakeholders or create a useful record.

I’m concerned about the resistance to providing transparency to property owners. While poor Meeting Minutes may have been tolerated in the past, that does not make it acceptable to continue this practice. Standards evolve, and as stewards of a large and professionally managed community, there is a responsibility to ensure that Meeting Minutes are clear, comprehensive, and transparent. This serves not only to keep members informed but also to protect the Board and demonstrate accountability.

I also fear that many who volunteer to be on HOA Boards do not understand the Fiduciary Duty/Responsibility they have LEGALLY AGREED TO PROVIDE to their Members. Being opaque, negligent, minimalist, dismissive, unaccountable, or/and evasive is not fulfilling the duties one has committed to.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Kimberly,

You should gather support and get elected to the board.
This way, you may get the things done you feel should be done.

Perhaps you can convince others to serve with you and replace the entire board.
KimberlyH7 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
I don't want to replace the entire board. Most, if not all, are good people. They just might be mis-advised by the Property Manager and not be up-to-date on laws.

I have volunteered to help, when they have openings, and will continue to. However, Members don't need to volunteer to have their legal rights honored.
LoriM15 (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
The minutes to our meetings are very similar to yours. They do not contain blow-by-blow descriptions of discussion. The board can only vote on items that are on the agenda. Owners have the right to speak on every agenda topic. I know you are aware of the official records for HOAs. You have the right to request to see any signed, active contract plus any bids that were received for any contract (bids only available for one year). There are other records you can obtain, so you can fill in the vague agenda with those details if you want to.

One thing I'm having an issue with about your recording the meeting is that Florida is a two party recording state. If the app did not let everyone in the meeting know they were being recorded (you can't just assume they know because they are on zoom) then there are serious legal issues with you recording the meeting privately.

The biggest issue I can see is that you seem to have a long-standing conflict with the PM and/or members of your board. You appear to want to be an armchair quarterback. You can't attend the meetings (I understand, paid employment has to come first) but you want to know everything going on and be part of the each meeting. Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. Unless you are on the board, you don't get a say in most things that happen in the HOA. Your documents say the board is elected to make those decisions for you. So unless you are willing to get support and run for the board, you aren't ever going to have all the information. It is perfectly legal for the board to discuss matters via email but they can't vote via email. So you are never going to have all the information about every topic and you are never going to see the advice that the PM is giving the board in order for them to make those decisions.
KimberlyH7 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
LoriM15,

Good points.. but I've been confusing.

I've attended every meeting for the past 8 months except the last one, because I was out of the country. After they started making "surprise" dramatic changes to rules and the neighborhood started going downhill, I felt I had to attend. I had no idea what was going on by reading what they were providing. I think I'm the only non-BOD member that has attended that many meetings. Most only show up once, when they have an issue.

However, I don't think Members should have to attend every BOD and Committee meeting in order to know what is going on. So many of our members are in their 70s and there is no way they can sit through the litany of BOD and Committee meetings going on. It's a huge inconvenience for me but I'm doing it. I have volunteered (they don't call any of the volunteers tho). I will probably run for the Board when a position opens up.

I'm no more at odds with the BOD than the rest of the members are. They treat them the same as me when they inquire about anything. The last time I was there, a Board member who is moving and resigned, tracked me down to encourage me to run to take his place. I told him I didn't think the BOD liked me. He said there are all different personalities there and thought I would be a good fit. We'll see how that goes.

The PM... she treats members poorly and I'm sure I'm probably one of her least favorites right now. She'll like me even less soon, but she serves at the pleasure of the board and IMO is putting her company's contract at risk and possibly her own license.

THE PRIVACY LAW IS CLEAR... The HOA law that allows Members to record meetings supersedes the Florida "2-PARTY CONSENT" and Wiretapping laws. I've verified this. It's because when you join an HOA, you are agreeing to Florida HOA laws and should "reasonably expect" that HOA meetings will be recorded. So, the 2-party/wiretapping defense isn't applicable here. It makes sense... how could they give HOA Members the right to record but require them to get every attendees permission?!

Because of me recording the meetings, the Board now includes verbiage on all meeting Agendas and at the beginning of each meeting that says members may be recording the meeting. That's the right thing to do, so everyone is made aware. I suggested they announce it to attendees when I first notified them that I planned to record meetings.

I have done a records request before. Also, new Florida HOA laws require HOA's to make soooo much of their documentation available on an HOA website to members by January 1st of this year. That will be helpful. Florida is really doing great things for HOA communities and members, I think.

Any other ideas or suggestions? I think most, if not all, of our BOD members are pretty good and do their best. I think the overconfident, rude, power tripping Property Manager who gives bad advice is the main problem. It might not even be her company, just her. However, that is a theory. I'm sure with time I'll find out and we'll see if she starts verifying laws before advising on her own version of them. To be licensed to be an HOA Property Manager, a person needs a GED/HS Diploma, 72-hours of training or less, and to pass the Florida Real Estate Sales Associate Exam with a score of at least 75. I think the continuing education requirement is 4 hours every 4 years (less than the 4-hours a year an HOA Director is now required to do in Florida).
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Kimberley wrote: "It's difficult to think of the proper way to coordinate with more HOA Members."

The way this has worked twice in in my highrise HOA of 200+units-12 years apart-- is the very old-fashioned way: become friends with your fellow owners, unite with the shared interest of replacing some directors at the next election, work hard to learn your docs, especially your bylaws, and campaign before your next annual election.

Some of us met as regular attendees of board meetings an others as members of a HOA committee. And at social events.

Kimberley wrote: " I'm not one for public venting on social sites, personal attacks, etc.. It's hard to figure out how to tactfully bring the topic up with other residents in a roughly 450 property neighborhood." Our groups that took over the Board in one year and immediately in the 2nd cases did none of those nasty things and don't even have a "social sites." I'm a little ticked off at the implication.

The sample minutes flawed for a couple of reasons that I. won't get Ito now.for HOAs the. very experienced hard members, Tim & Lori are correct.

Why spud you want o attend committee meetings, Kimberley? What Committees are there in your HOA?
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Does your association's contract with the property manager give authority to the property manager to count votes?
LoriM15 (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
I forgot to mention the electronic voting at the election. Your property manager won't be "counting votes" if you use a company to run the election for you. The property manager will have access to the dashboard which shows the number of votes received, but not who has voted, until the voting is closed. As you know, ballots and proxies are part of the official records and need to be available for owners to review for a year after the election. If you were to request the ballots, the PM could download that info from the dashboard or request the list from the electronic voting company. It's actually much more secure to use electronic voting than to rely on a person to count the votes and proxies. Much less chance for election interference.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I want to point out that the sample minutes Kimberly provided ins't a goods maple for FL HOAs, or CA HOAs, and wraps many others.One reason is below:

"3. Financial Overview (Presented by Jane Doe, Treasurer)

Q3 Financial Report
Mary Johnson, Vice President, reported a revenue increas.....

....Operational costs decreased by 7% due to vendor changes in July.

Next Steps
The finance team will prepare the draft annual budget for 2025....

Decision: Mary ... motioned to approve a 6% increase in product development initiatives for Q4 to support demand. Emily...seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously."

The problem is "decision" on a matter that was not listed on the Agenda and so was not posted xx hours in advance of the open Board meeting. In CA, FL and many states, Board may not make "scions, i.e.,vote unless theirs state requirements are met

šŸŽÆ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • āœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • āœ“ Share your experience
  • āœ“ Get expert advice
  • āœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here