💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RobertB12 (California)
Posts: 3
Posted:
There is a complaint from a homeowner that there neighbor installed security/surveillance cameras 6 total around the house. A few are pointing into the neighbors back yard. The homeowner that installed them said that the next door neighbor was harassing them, throwing eggs and dog feces etc on their property etc and that is why they installed them. The did not go through the ARC committe and did this on their own. Any suggestions on this one?
JC3
Posts: 290
Posted:
The only way to determine who is doing the damage is with cameras. The police will not do anything without verification. The only way to stop it is with proof.
GeraldT4
Posts: 1,022
Posted:
RobertB12 - I agree with what JC3 is saying about the need for proof. What do your covenants state regarding modifications to the exterior of a single family home? Do the ARC standards conflict with what your covenants state, if so was there an amendment to the covenants to permit the ARC standards. Dot your I's and cross your T's with this one is pretty much what I'm saying.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Our CC&Rs do NOT address a homeowner's ability to install external cameras and/or security cameras.

Like satellite dishes, HOA CC&Rs may be limited in what they can control about installation and placement of security cameras.

If the homeowner next the person who installed the cameras is concerned about their privacy rights, they should be discussing the situation with an attorney rather than the BoD, unless somehow your CC&Rs specifically address security cameras.

RobertB12 (California)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Any alteration to the exterior of home should go through the ARC process. Satellite dishes have been tried in court but not security cameras. The right to peaceful enjoyment seems to be lost when a camera is pointed into a backyard?
GeraldT4
Posts: 1,022
Posted:
RobertB12 - Why should any alteration go through the ARC? Because your covenants state so, because your rules and regs. state so, or because you believe they should? : )
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RobertB12 on 02/12/2008 12:52 PM
Any alteration to the exterior of home should go through the ARC process. Satellite dishes have been tried in court but not security cameras. The right to peaceful enjoyment seems to be lost when a camera is pointed into a backyard?

So does the right to peaceful enjoyment of one's yard without getting dog feces or garbage thrown into it.

I don't have any details at my fingertips regarding how courts would or do view them, however, security cameras on an exterior are not covered under either our CC&Rs nor our Arch Committee standards.

I recall seeing some news a while back on someone who DID install security cameras and had them pointed into their own backyard, and the neighbor sued claiming something similar, but lost.

I'm just saying that the neighbor who has the issue might be best served contacting their own attorney rather than the BoD of the HOA.

RobertB12 (California)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Because the CCR's state so. This also includes paint, landscape, garage doors, covered patios, fences etc.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Okay, so I mount them inside a window.

and STILL point them at my backyard and/or the side of the fence where resident is harassing me.

DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

I really have a big question. I wrote our ARC guidelines and am a person who firmly believes in following them very closely BUT, how obvious and noticeacble to the structure can these cameras possibly be? It seems to me that trying to go thru ARC on them would be going beyond the committees limits of control. IMHO.
CharlesW1 (Georgia)
Posts: 826
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DonnaS on 02/12/2008 1:20 PM

I really have a big question. I wrote our ARC guidelines and am a person who firmly believes in following them very closely BUT, how obvious and noticeacble to the structure can these cameras possibly be? It seems to me that trying to go thru ARC on them would be going beyond the committees limits of control. IMHO.

DonnaS,

I have been asked by our president to establish an ARC guidelines list also. I was curious to know if you would post your list, so I can refer to it for suggestions and idea as I go about constructing one for our community.

I understand I will need to modify the majority of what you have written, and some I may not use at all. Although you will provide me with items I may not be thinking of at all.

If you don’t mind, that is.

Thanks in advance.
Chuck W.

RobertB12,

I didn’t mean to “hijack” your thread. I know what your documents say about altering or changing the exterior of the house however, if the HO with the cameras were to get a court order his neighbor wouldn’t have much of a compliant then, nor would the HOA, really!

As stated above the judge is going to want to see some sort of proof of such claims.

Best of luck and keep us posted

Charles E. Wafer Jr.
MonicaE (Nevada)
Posts: 21
Posted:
I don't see what issue about the ARC is? To install a camera takes minimal amount of hardware, almost like hanging a picture or dart board outside.

It is more damaging to have eggs, feces and other objects onto the patio than the simple hardware to install the camera and get proog of who is the culprit might be. Once the culprit is caught, then the camera can be removed exterior brought back to its original state.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Chuck,
The manual is 43 pages on 8,1/2 X 11. I'll ask the moniter how to get them to you per word doc.
hoatalk (California)
Posts: 603
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DonnaS on 02/12/2008 1:50 PM

Chuck,
The manual is 43 pages on 8,1/2 X 11. I'll ask the moniter how to get them to you per word doc.

You may upload here as an attachment if the file is less than 200k in size. If > than 200K please reply here and we'll help.

HOATalk.com, A free service of Community123.com
Provider of Upscale Community Websites
CLICK HERE to get a FREE trial community website
*See legal notice below (end of page)
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:
Chuck,
These pages were written to begin with from our Restrictive Covenants, Many of these items will not pertain to you as this is a Florida developement
We then used some of the R and R's as they pertained along with a couple of County items such as Propane Tanks and pool regulations.

(attached is sheet 1 of 2)
📎 Attachments (1):

⏸ Downloads temporarily unavailable

📎1212113960271.doc(102 KB)
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:
The document is too large so I broke it into 4 sections this time.

They'll be four in all.
📎 Attachments (1):

⏸ Downloads temporarily unavailable

📎121224573154.doc(81 KB)
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Charles,
The 2nd one is a repeat so please ignore. It seems that the graphics will not go thru. Thanks
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
robert: unless it is a violation of a CC&R, then this is indeed an issue between neighbors. IF you have a rule covering the installation of adornments, outside items, decorations, etc, then you must look at the issue and enforce it.

One thing that the offended neighbor may want to use, in California, it is ILLEGAL to install a camera or tape anyone without notifying them that they are being taped, i believe. they should check out Cali's laws on privacy, videotape, and wiretap and such.

CharlesW1 (Georgia)
Posts: 826
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DonnaS on 02/12/2008 3:11 PM
Chuck,
These pages were written to begin with from our Restrictive Covenants, Many of these items will not pertain to you as this is a Florida developement
We then used some of the R and R's as they pertained along with a couple of County items such as Propane Tanks and pool regulations.

(attached is sheet 1 of 2)

DonnaS,

WOW, very impressive. I’ll be reading it throughout the week. As I have been asked to put together an ARC guidelines list myself that can be copied to the back of our ARC request form. Apparently our association has been making all decisions (in the past) bases upon what the current board collectively agrees with regardless of what was approved and why in the past. The “common sense” approached, as she (board president) would say is used to approve or NOT approve requests.

Although what I will be constructing will also be what I feel is right so unfortunately it’s pretty much the same thing, just in writing form. I feel then it can then be implemented for future ARC requests appose to what future boards feel is proper based upon personal preferences.

I’m sure I will get some good ideas even though you are in Florida as were I’m located in Georgia.

I’m hoping to keep the ARC guidelines list to just one 8 1/2” x 11”, page that will be copied to the back of our ARC request form. Which will then be conveniently available to those who submit the ARC form as a point of reference.

Thanks again for posting. I’m sure it will be helpful
Chuck W.

Charles E. Wafer Jr.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:


Chuck,
I was going to email the rest this am as HOATalk would do it for me but you probably do not need the rest. It is lot drawings and many items specific to our developement, including the applications. Good luck with getting it on 1 page. If you need any help with a specific item, I'll be more that happy to assist. Actually, the index which did go thru, can give you a list of items that you might need but have not thought of. Good luck as it is very thought provoking and hard work.
Donna
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Charles,
I forgot to add, in 2007, the Florida Statutes rewrote how ARC rules have to be done. They became much more specific in their nature. Boards and committees must have exact written guidelines such as "all houses must be pastel in color" was allowed prior to 2007. Now it must be "all houses must be white, pink yellow, no darker than a level 6. Every non allowance must be spelled out so our manual must be fine tuned.

As for your President and how they have been doing it, basically by a whim and a prayer, is certainly way to vague. Common sense works for some issues but not this area of decisions. And there is a lack of consistancy. What if they approve now and the next Board does not approve a similar request? For sure you need to get the guidelines written.
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
I think it is important to note that once you step ouside of your house you have zero expectation of privacy. Someone can photo you, video you, etc., in your yard because you are outside. This to me is an issue between neighbors, depending on the model of camera most today are small enough that honestly it shouldn't be an architectural issue.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
remember Brad, under the Patriot Act, you have no expectation of privacy INSIDE your house anymore either.

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JeffS19 on 07/14/2012 3:16 AM
Visit http://www.gbsdvr.com/ for buying a good security camera.

Same spam, different thread.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RobertB12 on 02/12/2008 12:24 PM
There is a complaint from a homeowner that there neighbor installed security/surveillance cameras 6 total around the house. A few are pointing into the neighbors back yard.

This is a dispute between neighbors and not something the Association should become involved in.

The only issue for the Association would be if there is a requirement to receive Association approval prior to installing the cameras and if there is, was the approval provided.

The neighbor can contact the police and/or an attorney about privacy issues if they desire.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Outside your home and other limited areas, there are no expections of privacy any more.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Shoot, I just realized that this thread is 4 years old and resurrected by a spammer.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Oh how the mighty have fallen... Sure you would have caught this right away...LOL!!!I saw it this morning and figured it would be gone by noon...

Former HOA President
ShannonJ (Virginia)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Great thread. Im late to the party but rather than starting another thread wanted to add on here.

Our association has 2 homes who have installed security cameras for safety concerns . neither went through the ARB for approval. Our covenants stae any exterior changes require an application but do not specifically address cameras. Is the need for approval covered in teh general "exterior alterations " statement?

2: some have bought up proivacy concerns and the need to protect the HOA from lawsuits. Why would the HOA be responsible if they did approve a security system and it later turned out that homeowner was violating another homeowners privacy?

As I understand the privacy laws inmy state, there is no expectation of privacy while out in public. This would include your front yard. Now, what about the back yard?....could be an argument there on personal expectation on rpivacy, right?

However, cameras may not view/record inside someone's house (through a window) where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
THIS IS A VERY OLD THREAD

I have taken the liberty of starting a new thread starting with the recent question posed above by ShannonJ.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here