PeggyW3 (Michigan)
Posts: 73
Posts: 73
Posted:
Our Association needs to replace a number of roofs, and we have had a Reserve Study done on them, and a roof study done as well. The problem I am having is currently these roofs are Presidential very expensive, asphalt, considered #1 in quality and have a life expectancy of 30-50 years. We do not know when they were installed but think most were installed 20 plus years ago. So we have done a Reserve Study which bothers me because they don't go up on each individual roof and use it's age to determine whether it needs to be replaced or not. The cost of replacement is 40-60 thousand each, some more, some a little less. We have over 100 units. We also have had a roof company assess them, and they went with a 1-5 scale with 5 being immediate need for replacement. 30+ are 4's and the majority are 3's. Well we don't have $700,000 to put a new roof on 30+ roofs in the next 2 years. A huge Assessment is being considered.
We live in one that is a 3 and looking around the area, the roofs all look so good, I am suspicious that both studies are using age and not aware of the quality, and we have no individual assessment of each rook, describing edges curling, granulation in the eaves, reported many leaks, etc. A young guy who is on the board says he will do any roof that has had leaks in the past, so I said, 1 leak, 2 leaks, 3 leaks, how many leaks and he said 1 or 2. I am at my wits end trying to talk with this board and tell them, BEFORE we start doling out thousands of dollars we should have a roof specialist or someone look carefully at each roof and see if there are some real problems with the shingles etc.
I am getting pushback. The reserve Study said most of the roofs were at least 23-26 years old and needed replacing within a 2-3 year period. BASED on their age and 1-2 leaks in the past few years??? That's nuts!!! HELP!!!!~!!
NOTE: I have looked on line and see most roofing companies assess roofs based on a 1-100 scale. I would like to know how to make sure we aren't being ripped off with putting 40-60 thousand dollar roof on a unit that can wait another year or two. There are concerns like, repairs are expensive, although I feel if a roof has a couple repairs and can wait a couple more years, they should. Where would I find out exactly what the criteria is for putting on a new roof? And where can I get someone to look at roof and see if the surveys are really accurate. They have ratings of 3.5 and 4.5 which seems silly to me as the 1-5 rating scale is pretty rough.
Thanks for your help, as always.
We live in one that is a 3 and looking around the area, the roofs all look so good, I am suspicious that both studies are using age and not aware of the quality, and we have no individual assessment of each rook, describing edges curling, granulation in the eaves, reported many leaks, etc. A young guy who is on the board says he will do any roof that has had leaks in the past, so I said, 1 leak, 2 leaks, 3 leaks, how many leaks and he said 1 or 2. I am at my wits end trying to talk with this board and tell them, BEFORE we start doling out thousands of dollars we should have a roof specialist or someone look carefully at each roof and see if there are some real problems with the shingles etc.
I am getting pushback. The reserve Study said most of the roofs were at least 23-26 years old and needed replacing within a 2-3 year period. BASED on their age and 1-2 leaks in the past few years??? That's nuts!!! HELP!!!!~!!
NOTE: I have looked on line and see most roofing companies assess roofs based on a 1-100 scale. I would like to know how to make sure we aren't being ripped off with putting 40-60 thousand dollar roof on a unit that can wait another year or two. There are concerns like, repairs are expensive, although I feel if a roof has a couple repairs and can wait a couple more years, they should. Where would I find out exactly what the criteria is for putting on a new roof? And where can I get someone to look at roof and see if the surveys are really accurate. They have ratings of 3.5 and 4.5 which seems silly to me as the 1-5 rating scale is pretty rough.
Thanks for your help, as always.