💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
I still can not understand why members think that an HOA is a police department.

Police departments have power granted by the State.

HOAs only have power granted by the covenants.

Typically, this is approving/disapproving exterior changes to your property and might allow for monetary penalties for violations. Monetary penalties will depend on the language used within the covenants. They also have the power/authority JUST AS EVERY OWNER HAS to enforce the covenants through the courts.

That is the only power they have.
If finances are tight, it might not even be possible for an Association to enforce anything through the courts (all depends on language about assessments, increases to assessments and special assessments).

Yes, I'm ranting a bit. We had a complaint that is a neighbor v. neighbor that, according to the files, have been going on for at least 5 years.

I honestly forgot about this part of being on the board. ARGHHHHHHHH
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Boards also have power from the state by statute but yes it's not police power. Many CC&Rs are out of date respecting current statutes.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Terri,

You are correct. TN does not have an HOA statute so I simply forgot about them (as the corporate statutes typically only deal with the running of the Association and not about covenant enforcement or assessments).

Thanks for pointing it out.

SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
I think its part of the many misassumptions people have about HOAs. They think the association is supposed to ensure property values, and part of this should be to prevent crime. As you note, that's not what HOAs do and even the police can't be everywhere 24/7.

As for CCR enforcement, I think people don't want to discuss anything with their neighbors to try to resolve something, even if it's faster (especially when people approach things in a calm manner). Then you have the ones who'd rather have the HOA do their dirty work for them.

To with - your neighbors who've been feuding for 5 years. At this point, they probably don't remember how the thing got started and are hellbent on being right as opposed to resolving the problem. Because THEY'RE right and everyone else is wrong. They don't want to take tge matter to small claims court because there's a chance they will lose and/or the judge will yell at everyone for wasting his/her time and get the hell out of the courtroom.

It may time to tell these two that unless they can show this is an association issue (involves use or abuse of the common area and/or is causing problems for other neighbors), they can either choose keep this going forever and a day or go to court on their own dime and settle it there. From this point on, the board will not review this matter further - they've been told all this already and have yet to come up with anything new.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 08/04/2024 9:07 AM
Terri,

You are correct. TN does not have an HOA statute so I simply forgot about them (as the corporate statutes typically only deal with the running of the Association and not about covenant enforcement or assessments).

Thanks for pointing it out.


???
https://www.steadily.com/blog/tennessee-hoa-laws-regulations
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Say, Tim, does the neighbor who complained to the Board believe his neighbor is violating the covenants or rules? Does the one who complains cite the covenant or rule he. believe was violated?
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
When we were dealing with some feuding residents, our lawyer said to put it in writing - once - that this is not an HOA issue and that the HOA will not take any action. After that, any further complaints should be acknowledged with "we have received your message" and nothing else. Of course you have to make sure that there isn't any new info in the repeat messages, but after 5 years they've probably said it all.

Inexperienced boards can give the chronic complainers new fuel for their issues. The complainers want the reaction. The board's job is to make things as uninteresting as possible.

WendyM5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 1,522
Posted:
Yep, people are clueless about how HOA's run. Most think that if they are not enforcing rules there is nothing else they do. 95% of the work I do is spending money for common area's maintenance.

We switched to self reporting of violations. Only 2 people took photos and submitted them online via google forms over the last 8 months. Old president said that was unethical to have neighbors snitch on each other and we need a management company to do that. fired Mgt company made $4 per violation and had a minimum of 20 every month sometimes 50 or more for a 150 home subdivision it was ridiculous and obvious money maker for them. Clover was written up as a weed as an example. almost all yards have clover down here.


vis ta vie
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 08/04/2024 10:23 AM
P
You are correct. TN does not have an HOA statute so I simply forgot about them (as the corporate statutes typically only deal with the running of the Association and not about covenant enforcement or assessments).



???
https://www.steadily.com/blog/tennessee-hoa-laws-regulations

The current act, Title 66, Chapter 27, Part 7, is very limited. Gives lease rights to existing owners if CC&Rs are amended to deny leasing, and a requirement that business entities that own residential property must keep the association aware of name changes and address changes.

SB405 that would have greatly modified the act appears to have died in committee.

See: https://www.doorloop.com/laws/tennessee-hoa-laws#an-overview-of-tennessee-hoa-laws

and for tracking: https://legiscan.com/TN/research/SB0405/2021

That said, there are some changes I found (thanks for making me look a second time) that does minor changes and took effect on 7/1/2024

https://legiscan.com/TN/text/SB2150/id/2982874

However, I did mistype (vs. misspoke) saying that there were no HOA statutes.
Thanks for correcting my error so everyone learns.

TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
I didn’t intend to correct you as I know nothing about TN HOAs. I was just curious. Thanks.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I'm curious too. Is the alleged violator actually violating the covenants or HOA rules?
DeanJ
Posts: 1,786
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 08/04/2024 8:16 AM
I still can not understand why members think that an HOA is a police department.

Police departments have power granted by the State.

HOAs only have power granted by the covenants.

Typically, this is approving/disapproving exterior changes to your property and might allow for monetary penalties for violations. Monetary penalties will depend on the language used within the covenants. They also have the power/authority JUST AS EVERY OWNER HAS to enforce the covenants through the courts.

That is the only power they have.
If finances are tight, it might not even be possible for an Association to enforce anything through the courts (all depends on language about assessments, increases to assessments and special assessments).

Yes, I'm ranting a bit. We had a complaint that is a neighbor v. neighbor that, according to the files, have been going on for at least 5 years.

I honestly forgot about this part of being on the board. ARGHHHHHHHH

Sounds good, except you left out HOAs have the authority to establish and enforce reasonable regulations. These regulation may go far beyond changes to the property. These regulations can cover the personal conduct of the persons who reside in the community.

This may include every thing from noise, maintenance, outside storage, traffic regulations, ect.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Rules should only apply to common area.

Regulations/policies that address noise, outside storage, etc. typically are clarifying broad statements that made within the CC&Rs.

As I told my board many times, you can not be in violation of an architectural guideline. The member may be in violation of the covenant requiring prior approval (which would have been denied based on the guidelines/regulations) but they are not in violation of a guideline.

KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
Tim,

I've been an active board member and HOA president for over a decade as no one else wants the job and believe I do okay for what we do. That said, demands that I become a quasi-police officer to enforce rules (alone) and now calls to my house for even the smallest complaints, rather than calling the management office, is leading me towards retirement later in 2024.

Maybe I've run my course and my energy for volunteering is waning (for HOA service), but I've grown tired of it - even for the complaints that have merit.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Tim wrote; "Rules should only apply to common areas." Is that what your HOA's covenants say? Or TN HOA statutes?

In my multi-story condo bldg. association, the Board has the authority to make "rules."* In CA, Rules are a governing document. And many in my HOA and others I've seen here do not apply solely to common areas. Tim's examples of outside storage, trash cans, perhaps window color coverings, rules about cars & parking, and about pets all are "rules." Alleged violation of them can result in an invitation to a hearing and a fine or demand to cure the violation.

In addition, in Calif., anyway, Architectural Guldelines" also are defined as "rules."

So....my CC&Rs, as do many, contains "restrictions" again "nuisances." This generated several "rules" for in-unit AND common ares conduct in different parts of our Rules Handbook, e..g rules about dogs barking, smoking materials, hard-flooring requirements, window signage, rudeness to staff, what's permitted in our deeded parking spaces, etc.

* There are strict required steps the Board must follow per CA statutes.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By WendyM5 on 08/04/2024 3:01 PM
Yep, people are clueless about how HOA's run. Most think that if they are not enforcing rules there is nothing else they do. 95% of the work I do is spending money for common area's maintenance.

We switched to self reporting of violations. Only 2 people took photos and submitted them online via google forms over the last 8 months. Old president said that was unethical to have neighbors snitch on each other and we need a management company to do that.

Your old president is a bit of a dweeb (which may ge why he's an ex-president) I don't believe in homeowners telling on each other for childish reasons, but he needs to remember what snitching really is. Someone's gets in trouble and in order to get out of it or lessen severe penalties (sometimes both), he/she offers up information on another person who did something just as awful or worse. That's not the same as trying to work things out with a neighbor who ignores you or tells you to kick rocks, and do you need to serve him /her/them accordingly.

Rules enforcement is difficult and so boards have to be mindful on what violations are more problematic than others. For instance, junk cars in one's yard is already ugly, but they can also attract vermin, causing another set of problems, including health risks. Ditto for dog poo everywhere and people who seem to love hosting drag races in the middle of the night - loud as hell and someone driving down the street at the wrong time can get hit. Those issues are more important to me than, say, someone who puts up a shadowbox style privacy fence instead of the approved standard because tastes can and do change.

To keep rules enforcement consistent, property managers CAN help in this regard because they don't live in the community. The board can always instruct the property manager to keep an eye out for spe ific violations that have caused problems and that could dissuade them from loo,ING for stuff just to make money. Maybe that's what your board should have done.

Since you're now self managed, there's nothing wrong with setting priorities on violations affe ting the common area and telling homeowners exactly why they have a right to go after people in court if they violate CCRs but common areas aren't involved. If they don't like your approach, they can always vote you out and put in someone who will do what they want or do it themselves. As I've said before, you don't always get what you want and that means determining what really warrants your time and energy,

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Kelly,

I feel your pain.

If it were me, I would inform them to contact the management office as that is part of their contract that we pay for. If sever enough, to contact the local authorities.

What I want to do, is not what I should do. So I do what I should.

There will always be one or two. Try to let it roll off of you.
You can always have his number go to voice mail and not respond for a couple of days explaining that you just saw the voice mail.

Once or twice, after hearing him complain about it, should be enough to have them call the MC.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Your contributions to this forum almost always are really helpful, Kelly. Yours *& my last posts must have crossed.

Based on several years of board service, with a full-time community manager, It's easy for me to say, but residents simply do not personally contact board members even though some directors are well-known in the community. And it's pretty easy to top directors on the elevators for a couple of moments to vent. but it just doesn't happen.

There's a form on our website to be completed by residents where alleged violations of our rules are inserted. I probably complete it 2-3Xs a year. There's another form for Work Orders that also goes to mgmt..

Or, Send out a memo from the PM on behalf of them and the Board stating firmly that all association business, suggestions, complaints go to them. Or place a notice in a newsletter from the Board.

MarshallT (New York)
Posts: 414
Posted:
It can be tough. You're right, some disputes are neighbor vs neighbor and it's not the HOA's responsibility to resolve every argument between people.

If the board hasn't done so already, you may suggest they hire a mediator and split the costs.
JulieH4
Posts: 75
Posted:
As a property manager, I deal with this a lot. Why they feel like I need to put in the middle is beyond me. One person had a friend park behind their house blocking part of the driveway. Instead of the neighbor contacting them, they emailed me. I simply asked the person to have their friend move. Simple! The upset neighbor that contacted me could have done the same thing.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here