💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MichelleC8 (California)
Posts: 80
Posted:
I’ve been off my board for a few years now. Recently a neighbor had suffered damage from a leak that is coming from the roof. Our Board of Directors is insisting that the internal damage caused from the leak is the responsible of the individual homeowner. We have not changed our CCR’s in over 10 years and I know for fact that this is not always been the case damages that were due to or non-maintained HOA property. I provided my neighbor with a list of damages that were repaired over the years that I served on the board for the example plumbing that backed up that was an HOA related pipe, flooring being replaced, etc.. I’ve poured over RCC ours. I cannot see where it indicates who is responsible for the internal damage despite being an HOA maintenance issue. Is this on the Davis Sterling California members? Any California HHA members please chime in. I’m just trying to figure it out what they are referencing.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Imagine unit is a box. Turn box upside down. What comes out is owner responsibility. Now if that box got wet then the wet box is the HOA but the contents are still owners.

The HOA insurance covers the roof and the leak. The owners insurance should cover their contents

Former HOA President
DeanJ
Posts: 1,786
Posted:
This is what some boards do when they believe their duty is to keep fees as low as possible. They basically try to cheat homeowners.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Dean you do understand that the HOA has to pay deductible or if damages does not reach deductible amount. Just FYI our deductible was $20,0000. That meant that everyone dues is used to pay that deductible for one person claim. Just to put it into perspective.

Former HOA President
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Mich

Without reading your docs, I say your BOD is wrong. This issue may well end up in the hands of and attorney.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Posted By JohnC46 on 05/18/2024 11:13 PM
Mich

Do we have several issues here? Damage to the roof and/or common areas and damage to the unit. In the case of damage to the unit, the unit owner would file a claim with their own insurance company, regardless of where the damage came from. The unit owner's insurance company would then subrogate with the associations insurance company.

Many may well it was not my fault why should I have to file? Well, that is how the game is played.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
People in condos often assume that all damage originating in the common elements such as the roof is the responsibility of the association.

Not true.

Generally responsibility to "maintain, repair and replace" the interior of a condo is the responsibility of the unit owner. For example, if the roof has a slow leak that eventually results in water stains and other damage in a ceiling, that interior repair is on the condo owner. Mold is nearly always a maintenance responsibility because it grows over time. The CC&Rs will define who is responsible for what.

This can change if the damage is the result of an insurable event: eg;. a storm tears off part of the roof away and rain damages the interior of home. Then insurance comes into play.

To remind Melissa and others, the "flip the box over" analogy ONLY WORKS IF YOUR ASSOCIATION HAS ALL-INCLUDED INSURANCE. If it carries "bare walls" insurance, the interior of a unit won't be covered. The CC&Rs should say what kind of insurance your association must carry, and the insurers will work out who pays for what. Read the policy documents and/or consult with your insurer.

Even if the damage to the interior is not caused by a storm, it's possible an owner's HO6 policy will cover repairs. And yes, the owner is generally responsible for the association's deductible. It will all depend what the various policies say. Call your insurer.

Nowadays a board can be reluctant to put in an insurance claim, because insurers are dumping clients or raising premiums "through the roof" (heh, heh). This can change the calculus. For example, when I was on the board, if the total cost for repairs was close to the deductible amount, we'd pay out of pocket and not put in the claim.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
From Michelle's first post, it appears that she referred to an insurable event (pipes backing up and damaging a unit). So, to summarize:

* Insurable events are different from maintenance events, and they will be handled differently. Don't assume one is the same as the other.

* The "flip the box" trick is handy and dandy, but ONLY IF YOU HAVE ALL-INCLUDED INSURANCE. If your association carries "bare walls" insurance (like Kerry's high rise, I think), then flipping the box leads you straight to the wrong answer. (*) The various insurance policies will spell out who covers what.

* Putting in an insurance claim can (and probably will) have negative consequences in the form of higher premiums or even loss of coverage in the future. Boards need to consider this when deciding whether or not to put in a claim, since it can be less costly overall to simply pay out of pocket. Editorial: Too many boards have a short-term perspective when making decisions, and in their defense the condo/HOA system pretty much forces them into it. Kudos to boards that do think long term.

* Condo insurance confuses everybody.

(* I wish I'd never brought up "flip the box", which I got from our association's insurance agent. Ever since then, every dang blasted time we talk about condo insurance, somebody repeats it as if it is universally true. It's not universally true. For the folks whose association doesn't carry all-included insurance, it's bad information. I repeat this every dang blasted time. I can't for the life of me understand why it doesn't sink in. I think I've started yelling ... )
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
The procedure when one's unit suffers damage, even from outside source such as a roof leak, they file a claim with their insurance company who will the subrogate with the HOA's insurance company.

I can hear the scream now: but I did not cause the damage so why do I have the get my insurance company involved? Sorry but that is how the game is played.
GregoryT1
Posts: 315
Posted:
We are undergoing a roofing project and we are trying to figure out who pays what when a leak occurs. I am finding it is like everyone saying it depends on the document, and it depends on the type of insurance coverage. In our situation we are finding out that the roofer will fix the leak based on his warranty he is placing. That means the roof will be fixed and he is paying the time and material. The damages to the building and unit is falling into two categories. One category is the building (joists, support beams siding) based on the docs and how much coverage from the condo building insurance. The unit damage will be the unit owners and their condo insurance (H-06) insurance coverage. In the past we were not consistent in our understanding of this. It is an eyeopener. Also we have to take into account of lapsed maintenance of the building as opposed to a real item where something breaks. Good discussion. Also what does the warranty say for the roof? This is the original poster.

Here is a roofing link. I hope it helps. It is for commercial roofing but it's good info on how complex roof warranties and what they don't cover. There is a section on consequential damage. That is where the leftover damage from the leak is not covered. If that is not covered by the roofer, then how is it covered by the condo? That is a more of a real question for the forum.

https://www.jurinroofing.com/typical-roof-warranty-coverage-explained/
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
A warranty will complicate the decisions beyond what it already is. Whatever is due under the warranty agreement will come first, I think. But I encourage boards to put this in the hands of the professionals who deal with these issues all the time. You're much more likely to get a good decision.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Suggest you research proposed legislation SB900 that will make homeowners responsible to "maintain, repair, and replace" ALL utility lines supplying gas, electrical, water, and heat to the subdivision when an "interruption in service" occurs in a common area.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:

With Cathy, let's ban the "flip-the-box" wording FOREVER!

What kind of insurance coverage the HOA's master policy has is DETERMINED by the CC&Rs. There is a CC&R article on insurance. Insurance agents READ this Article so that they know what kind of master insurance coverage to provide to an HOA.

My multi story condo bldgs.' CC&Rs state that Owners are not covered by the HOA policy for the repair/replace damage in their units even when caused by a common area problem.* This commonly is called "bare walls" insurance. The master policy ONLY covers the replacement of units' sheet rock (but not its paint) on the walls or ceiling, and repairs to the sub flooring-- but NOT including floor coverings.

Other condo bldgs.' HOA master coverage -- commonly called "walls in"-- is all inclusive, it does cover the fixtures & cabinets & flooring materials too (I think?). It, of course is much, much more expensive than "bare walls" insurance.

In these days of horrendous increases to HOAs' master policies, it's easy to see that many HOA Boards would like to switch from "walls in" to "bare walls." But they may NOT do that IF the CC&Rs require "walls in" without a vote of the members to amend the CC&Rs.

In Michelle's case, on one hand, it's possible the HOA does have "walls in" coverage, but the Board is trying to cheat and pretend there is no such coverage. On the other hand, earlier Boards may have been mistaken and misunderstood their HOA's coverage, which in reality is "bare walls."

So, Michelle, scrutinize your CC&R's article on insurance. Also read your HOA's master policy. Let us know what you find. (I suspect you've been reading the Maintenance article of your CC&Rs)

Finally, our restated ('22) CC&Rs require that owners carry an HO6 policy. They also make owners responsible for mold no matter the source.

Terri has misinterpreted the proposed legislation she cites. I won't go into it because it's ONLY proposed and it's not relevant to this post. It is not about insurance.

*Unless damage was cause by HOA "negligence."
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Need to correct my usage: insurance that covers fixtures, cabinets, floor coverings, etc., is called "all in," (not "walls-in which is a different kind of coverage).

I'd also say, Michelle, that basically you should ignore all above posts except for Cathy's.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Michelle is asking for help from California contributors. My post was intended to be informative for possible very near future shift in who is going to be responsible for what. Please don;t censor others' comments.
https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB900/id/2942954
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
OK, Terri. For those who want to read this proposed legislation, note how Terri mischaracterizes it. I won't discuss it as it's unrelated to the OP's problem. She Amy wish to start a new post about it.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:


At a recent board meeting with the association attorney (general info only, no privileged discussions) she brought up recent challenges with insurance that everyone is facing. She said that they're trying to come up with ways to help their clients keep costs down and mentioned switching from all-included to bare walls coverage. Up goes my hand, and I pointed out that our Declaration requires all-in. (I suspect that the type of insurance coverage is going to depend in part on the structure of the buildings, which nobody can change.)

Stuff like this is why they keep me around...

Anyway, our insurance agent once mentioned that even the pros scratch their heads when they deal with condo insurance, so I'm not surprised boards get it wrong.
GregoryT1
Posts: 315
Posted:
hi Cathy and all,

This is a great post since I am learning on this topic.

So my understanding from the replies is that the assn and unit responsibility will be in the maintenance section of the docs. In a sudden issue like a fast roof leak there is a section called "repair after casualty" that will list out the assn and unit owner responsibility from an event.

The timing of the issue (sudden or gradual over time) will play a part in this and where did it originate. Also as a separate item you can have "incidental" damage from work that the condo assn is doing and then that is condo responsibility depending on the condo docs. Mixed in with all of this is the state's laws on this matter.

Also from another post the boundary definition of the unit is important.

Thanks this will setup us for success in the future. We were doing it wrong in some cases.
PatJ1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 568
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GregoryT1 on 05/20/2024 7:56 AM
hi Cathy and all,

This is a great post since I am learning on this topic.

So my understanding from the replies is that the assn and unit responsibility will be in the maintenance section of the docs. In a sudden issue like a fast roof leak there is a section called "repair after casualty" that will list out the assn and unit owner responsibility from an event.

The timing of the issue (sudden or gradual over time) will play a part in this and where did it originate. Also as a separate item you can have "incidental" damage from work that the condo assn is doing and then that is condo responsibility depending on the condo docs. Mixed in with all of this is the state's laws on this matter.

Also from another post the boundary definition of the unit is important.

Thanks this will setup us for success in the future. We were doing it wrong in some cases.

It took me a long time to understand HO-6 insurance and how it plays out with our Master Policy. Our HOA board and previous boards spent +$1,000's paying for repairs that we didn't need to.

It may be state specific - In NC, stacked condo's have to be insured by the HOA as if it's the HOA's own.

HOA deductible is $10,000. In NC, the owner's insurance is responsible for the first $10,000 regardless of where the damage came from. HOA is responsible for the repair of the cause. If there's $15,000 worth of damage, owner's HO-6 covers the $10,000 and the Master Policy covers the rest, as it's own. If the damage is under $10,000, it's all on the owner.

It can be very confusing and it's difficult to understand. I asked lots of questions and never got a straight answer from our PM or insurance agent. Don't really think they understood it either.

If an owner experiences a casualty and is not getting straights answers, it's best that the owner file a claim against their owner's policy and let the insurance companies determine the outcome. Then the owner and the HOA can determine to go ahead with the claim or cover the repairs "out of pocket".

JeffT2 (Iowa)
Posts: 880
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MichelleC8 on 05/18/2024 6:49 PM
... I cannot see where it indicates who is responsible for the internal damage despite being an HOA maintenance issue. Is this on the Davis Sterling California members? Any California HHA members please chime in. I’m just trying to figure it out what they are referencing.

https://www.davis-stirling.com/HOME/W/Water-Damage-Checklist

"Liability. The failure of a water line in the wall does not automatically make an association liable for water damage inside a unit. There must be negligence by the association that caused the damage. In the absence of negligence, each party is responsible for repairing their own damage. That means the association repairs the common areas and the owner repairs any damaged cabinetry, floor coverings, and personal property."

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Who is obligated to maintain/repair/replace is in your maintenance article/section of your CC&Rs (aka declaration, covenants, did restrictions) Gregory. It's about WHO must do maintenance/repair/replace.

What kind of insurance is required in your HOA's CC&Rs is in the insurance artilce/section. It's about WHO pays for the repair/replace.

Where the water originates does matter: If you clog your sink & it overflows damaging something in your unit, your HO6 pays. If water intrusion originated in the common area, the HOA pays to fix it. WHO pays to fix damage in your unit depends on the insurance your CC&Rs require and that your HOA presumably has.

Your unit boundaries should be defined in a CC&Rs section called Unit.

CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JeffT2 on 05/20/2024 10:21 AM
Posted By MichelleC8 on 05/18/2024 6:49 PM
... I cannot see where it indicates who is responsible for the internal damage despite being an HOA maintenance issue. Is this on the Davis Sterling California members? Any California HHA members please chime in. I’m just trying to figure it out what they are referencing.

https://www.davis-stirling.com/HOME/W/Water-Damage-Checklist

"Liability. The failure of a water line in the wall does not automatically make an association liable for water damage inside a unit. There must be negligence by the association that caused the damage. In the absence of negligence, each party is responsible for repairing their own damage. That means the association repairs the common areas and the owner repairs any damaged cabinetry, floor coverings, and personal property."


And of course proving negligence means a legal fight. This is where the cost of eventually settling an issue can far exceed the actual cost of repairs - in terms of time, inconvenience, and actual dollars spent. It can have impacts beyond the immediate dispute - for example, if the insurers jack up the premiums or even dump you as a client.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Nice citation via Jeff from Davis-stirling.com, Michelle. I need to add, though, that if the HOA has "all in" insurance, it will pay for damage to the unit's improvements.

Also see. https://www.davis-stirling.com/HOME/W/Water-Damage-Insurance’Master Policies.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here