Notary Employee/Office Manager

DawnL6 (South Carolina)
Posts: 226

Posted:

Our notary employee and office/property manager uttered non existence public record, which still had the recording/file number stamped in upper right corner of the documents.Also,the content was different,and as this went on for over a year,arguing,telling homeowners,and myself we were reading the documents wrong,etc.
After thinking I had went bat sh!!!!t crazy,I talked and went to the deeds office and they stated to me,by email,they did not place the stamp on those pages..please help

SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964

Posted:

There's not enough here to figure out what you're talking about, so slow down,and try to explain this again. Once again, punctuation is yoyr friend, otherwise you have a messy word salad. What documents are you talking about? What public record?

If this is related to your conversation about the master deed, you may need to go ahead and talk to an attorney. Most of us aren't attorneys a lice in different states, so what's in our state may not apply to yours

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062

Posted:

Notary stamps are placed on documents to certify signatures.

Recording stamps (may simply be pen & ink) are used to signify that the document is recorded and in what county book/page.

LetA (Nevada)
Posts: 2,679

Posted:

Typically notary stamps are embossed at or near the notary's signature. Official documents from the county can be anywhere
the county decides. I have always seen them on the right side almost near the margin either right below or right above the bottom fold.

DawnL6 (South Carolina)
Posts: 226

Posted:

I'm sorry about punctuation and grammar,I cannot see my screen when typing.
The notary public employee/property manager,researched,drafted the rules and regulations for the association.She distributed a set of rules and regulations that had a recording stamp on each page from the deeds office,which was a 7 line stamp,stating that "no warning had to be issued before fine.I went to the deeds office and got a copy myself,and that copy had a single line recording stamp in the upper right hand corner,but this set stated"after a warning"(just 1 example) and the maximum fine was $1000 up to daily.
So I showed the deeds office the 7 line stamp,and that set is not online,has not been recorded and not a public record.Deeds office stated "the stamp originated from our office,however,we do not put a stamp on each page as the set you showed us..
Notary/property manager claims she got the "draft" set mixed in the day she goes to record these documents by accident,and mailed these by accident ,but fines me a $1000 ,and states in email "she does not have to give warning 1st".
I can see mailing draft set by mistake,but enforcing that set is the fraud,due to her supporting that set.
Okay,so now how did the recording stamp get on each page,it didn't come from the deeds office,she /board of directors knows,has knew,and still backing these documents,and has many liens and has foreclosed on many units.This was/is intentional,and the board is aiding and abetting as this continues.
Did that make more sense?

DawnL6 (South Carolina)
Posts: 226

Posted:

I'm sorry about punctuation and grammar,I cannot see my screen when typing.
The notary public employee/property manager,researched,drafted the rules and regulations for the association.She distributed a set of rules and regulations that had a recording stamp on each page from the deeds office,which was a 7 line stamp,stating that "no warning had to be issued before fine.I went to the deeds office and got a copy myself,and that copy had a single line recording stamp in the upper right hand corner,but this set stated"after a warning"(just 1 example) and the maximum fine was $1000 up to daily.
So I showed the deeds office the 7 line stamp,and that set is not online,has not been recorded and not a public record.Deeds office stated "the stamp originated from our office,however,we do not put a stamp on each page as the set you showed us..
Notary/property manager claims she got the "draft" set mixed in the day she goes to record these documents by accident,and mailed these by accident ,but fines me a $1000 ,and states in email "she does not have to give warning 1st".
I can see mailing draft set by mistake,but enforcing that set is the fraud,due to her supporting that set.
Okay,so now how did the recording stamp get on each page,it didn't come from the deeds office,she /board of directors knows,has knew,and still backing these documents,and has many liens and has foreclosed on many units.This was/is intentional,and the board is aiding and abetting as this continues.
Did that make more sense?

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836

Posted:

Are these by laws or CC&Rs? By laws are not required to be filed publicly in many states. They are only for the corporation. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation are public.

Not sure which document you are referring. Plus did you have a violation that you are fighting? What is the situation?

Former HOA President

JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219

Posted:

Quote:

Posted By DawnL6 on 04/09/2024 9:17 PM

Notary/property manager claims she got the "draft" set mixed in the day she goes to record these documents by accident,and mailed these by accident ,but fines me a $1000 ,and states in email "she does not have to give warning 1st".

A $1,000 fine for what??? And not have to give a warning first … is she nuts??? LOL my response to something this unbelievably stupid would be to call my local and state attorney general’s offices and file a complaint. Sorry … I don’t deal well with beyond stupid. If as you state is true a $1,000 fine is excessive especially if assessed without notice or opportunity to rectify.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062

Posted:

Is it possible that what was provided to the membership was a compilation of multiple documents?

Perhaps the recording stamp on the provided document was referencing many documents.

Did you look up the book and page number the provided document referenced?

Have you brought this discovery to the board?

DawnL6 (South Carolina)
Posts: 226

Posted:

Yes,I have showed the board of directors the documents,along with emails I received from the deeds office stating the "recording/file stamp" did not come from their office,and the documents were not a part of the public documents, as the documents suggested.
The board of directors have will not respond to my allegations,and continued with placing liens on numerous units.

DawnL6 (South Carolina)
Posts: 226

Posted:

Yes,I have showed the board of directors the documents,along with emails I received from the deeds office stating the "recording/file stamp" did not come from their office,and the documents were not a part of the public documents, as the documents suggested.
The board of directors have will not respond to my allegations,and continued with placing liens on numerous units.