💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

VincentD1 (California)
Posts: 2
Posted:
In our CA Condo complex we have a new owner who bought their unit in auction site unseen. The property has significant damage the previous owner did not disclose. The roof is leaking which the HOA is in the process of getting money to replace. The new owner is requesting the HOA to make all the repairs which include remediation, wood rot replacement, and fumigation. Was looking to see if anyone knows laws or guidelines that stipulate who is responsible for these repairs that have become tens of thousands of dollars due to neglect and not notifying the HOA?

Thanks for the assistance in advance.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Your governing documents should spell out what parts of the buildings are the "unit", what parts are "common elements" and what parts are "limited/exclusive use common elements". They will also spell out who is responsible for maintenance of each of these. Typically the condo owner must maintain all parts of the unit, the association maintains the common elements, and the limited use common elements can go either way. When I say "either way", I don't mean that it's open to debate - it's just that some associations do it one way, and others do it the other way - probably has a lot to do with the structure of the buildings.

Unfortunately the new owner did a very stupid thing, and any repairs to the unit will probably be on him (or up for dispute with the former owner who probably had a duty to disclose at least some of this). The association will have to repair the common elements and possibly the limited common elements. The new owner should check with his insurance agent because it's possible that some of the damage will be insurable. But mold usually isn't an insurable event (except down south where mold can grow practically overnight after a hurricane). Up north, you have to have a continuous source of moisture to have mold - in my part of the world it takes about four years of leaking for mold to announce its presence.

So... your first order of business is figuring out who is responsible for what. Once you get a solid answer on that, then you can start looking into how things will be paid for. You may want to give the association attorney a heads up in case this winds up in litigation.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
I forgot to note: it's possible/probable that your governing docs have a statement saying that owners are responsible for notifying the association if there are issues that the association is responsible for repairing. The trouble is that this can be difficult to enforce even if the owner is still there. If the person is gone... not sure what you do.

I strongly encourage everyone to figure out how to resolve this without resorting to lawsuits. It's easy to spend far more on lawyers than you'll spend on just fixing whatever needs fixing. Unfortunately, people can get so angry about this stuff that they become more interested in burning the other guy than they are in coming up with an acceptable solution for all parties. This is how dumb financial decisions are made.

ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
1.
From the 'net: "Most homeowner's insurance policies explicitly exclude coverage for pre-existing damages."

2.
Prior to purchasing this home at auction, the courts say that this buyer had proper and legal notice of the covenants recorded with the county. This means the courts would say the buyer knew, for the most part, what the repair responsibility of the HOA is and what the repair responsibility of the unit owner is.

3.
Scour the covenants and start figuring out what, if any, responsibility the HOA has. If damage to common area (or LCA for which the HOA is responsible) more likely than not appears to be caused by neglect of the former owner, then I say tough cookies to the new owner. He has to pay for this himself.

4.
I get a wheeler-dealer feel about this owner. He bought the home as is, probably for a song. He knew darn well it might need a lot of repairs. The board should stand firm in its decisions.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Why isn't this owner going after the previous owner since it wasn't disclosed? This is the danger of buying a house at auction - it may be dirt cheap, but can also mean tbe last owner no longer cared what happened because he/she/they were going to lose it anyway. Sometimes people can get these homes inspected before the sale, but most times nit, so you pays your money and take your chances.

Personally, I'd skip paying for everything else except the roof since that appears to be common area an HOA responsibility. Check 6our documents to see whose responsible for what and check 5hat against tge master insurance policy. It may be this owner will have to duke it out with the former owner (good luck with finding him/her/them) or bite tge bullet and foot the bill.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
LetA (Nevada)
Posts: 2,679
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 03/02/2024 1:56 PM
Why isn't this owner going after the previous owner since it wasn't disclosed? This is the danger of buying a house at auction - it may be dirt cheap, but can also mean tbe last owner no longer cared what happened because he/she/they were going to lose it anyway. Sometimes people can get these homes inspected before the sale, but most times nit, so you pays your money and take your chances.

Personally, I'd skip paying for everything else except the roof since that appears to be common area an HOA responsibility. Check 6our documents to see whose responsible for what and check 5hat against tge master insurance policy. It may be this owner will have to duke it out with the former owner (good luck with finding him/her/them) or bite tge bullet and foot the bill.

When someone buys a property as-is, disclosure is a moot point.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Are you on the Board, Vincent? What size is your HOA? Multi-story? Do you have a property manager?

First are you certain this is a Condominium Common Interest Development (CID) and not a PUD or PD CID?

If a condo CID, the HOA is almost always obligated to repair & replace roofs. Are you saying there no funds in reserves to repair the roof(s?)

Are you saying that termite damage is only to his unit and not to others?

In Calif., HOAs are obligated to treat termites and repair damage to the condo common areas unless the CC&Rs say otherwise. I'd say the HOA would be responsible for the "exclusive use common areas," too, which are basically balconies & decks. If in the Unit, the owner is responsible unless the source of the infestation is from the common area. You can learn this at Davis-stirling.com, a site by CA HOA lawyers that has a great Index. In this case, go to Termite and see the lawyers' advice plus the Civil Code from which they draw In this case, it's CA Civ. Code 4780. Do not that the HOA does not pay for lodging, etc. while termite work is being done.

As Cathy notes, other kinds of damage that need maintenance & repair to his exclusive common area decks & balconies might be his obligation to repair. You must read the section of your CC&Rs about this. Look under a heading called "Maintenance" or Maintenance Obligations." It's here that sometimes who has the obligation to repair is unclear (unless termite damage).

Perhaps no other woes are all to see his balcony/deck form their units? Here in my Muti- story condo bldg., I can see many balconies and would report unsightly damage in balconies and the the HOA Board would take action to have the owners remediate it IF owners' responsibility

If you're on the Board and you and other directors really don't know where to look for at least some answers to your questions, I strongly urge your Board to approve consulting with your HOA attorney who should be easily able to answer your questions after a quick look at your CC&Rs. I would NOT wait till this owner start making noises that he's going to sue and starts bullying tactics.
VincentD1 (California)
Posts: 2
Posted:
Yes Im on the board it has 30 units 2 stories. CID and we have an HOA company but I dont trust their advice very much. HOA company and the lawyer recommended we just pay for all these repairs which didnt sound right to me so started to look for advice elsewhere. The lawyer made it seem that do to the problem stemming from the roof we are responsible for all the remediation and wood rot. Im not sure if termites are just in that unit so far it seems that way. Our CC&Rs state that we are only responsible for the common areas but as I said the lawyer and HOA company said due to the roof leaking and causing mold they say we have to cover the repairs. I have my personal broker and their team going over our CC&Rs just to verify for me. We dont have the money to replace the roof we are currently doing a special assessment our last board had a more dont look for problems wont find problems mentality. Thank you all for the replies and advice ill take a look at Davis-stirling.com for a better understanding of our situation as well.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
An attorney who specializes in HOAs is best . I don't think your "broker" is qualified to read & correctly interpret CA CC&Rs. Or know about mold.

I wouldn't expect your Mgmt. co to be able to give much advice, because they are not attorneys.

Do check to see if mold in the Unit, NO MATTER HOW caused is the HOA's obligation to remediate. Our amended CC&Rs make it entirely the owners' responsibility even if caused by a common area problem.

Take a look at "mold" in the Davis-stirling.com Index--I haven't read what they say about this topic.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By VincentD1 on 03/02/2024 1:25 PM
In our CA Condo complex we have a new owner who bought their unit in auction site unseen. The property has significant damage the previous owner did not disclose. The roof is leaking which the HOA is in the process of getting money to replace. The new owner is requesting the HOA to make all the repairs which include remediation, wood rot replacement, and fumigation. Was looking to see if anyone knows laws or guidelines that stipulate who is responsible for these repairs that have become tens of thousands of dollars due to neglect and not notifying the HOA?

Thanks for the assistance in advance.

First stop would be to examine all the disclosures from the real estate transaction. If buyer doesn't expect to be liable, he needs to review with a fine tooth comb all the disclosures. If something wasn't disclosed, then buyer has recourse against seller - at least all the damage that is homeowner's responsibility.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LetA on 03/02/2024 3:51 PM
Posted By SheliaH on 03/02/2024 1:56 PM
Why isn't this owner going after the previous owner since it wasn't disclosed? This is the danger of buying a house at auction - it may be dirt cheap, but can also mean tbe last owner no longer cared what happened because he/she/they were going to lose it anyway. Sometimes people can get these homes inspected before the sale, but most times nit, so you pays your money and take your chances.

Personally, I'd skip paying for everything else except the roof since that appears to be common area an HOA responsibility. Check 6our documents to see whose responsible for what and check 5hat against tge master insurance policy. It may be this owner will have to duke it out with the former owner (good luck with finding him/her/them) or bite tge bullet and foot the bill.


When someone buys a property as-is, disclosure is a moot point.

No, disclosures are required always.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
A real estate attorney needed here. Plus the HOA maybe responsible for roofs as you are planning this already. However, like insurance, if you flipped the condo over, every thing that falls out is usually owner responsibility.

When a HOA pays it means every single member pays/contributes. This could mean higher dues or special assessment.

Former HOA President
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By VincentD1 on 03/02/2024 5:31 PM
Yes Im on the board it has 30 units 2 stories. CID and we have an HOA company but I dont trust their advice very much. HOA company and the lawyer recommended we just pay for all these repairs which didnt sound right to me so started to look for advice elsewhere. The lawyer made it seem that do to the problem stemming from the roof we are responsible for all the remediation and wood rot. Im not sure if termites are just in that unit so far it seems that way. Our CC&Rs state that we are only responsible for the common areas but as I said the lawyer and HOA company said due to the roof leaking and causing mold they say we have to cover the repairs. I have my personal broker and their team going over our CC&Rs just to verify for me. We dont have the money to replace the roof we are currently doing a special assessment our last board had a more dont look for problems wont find problems mentality. Thank you all for the replies and advice ill take a look at Davis-stirling.com for a better understanding of our situation as well.

About the part in bold above:

Take this with a grain of salt because this is from Ohio and may only be specific to my condo community, but our insurance agent said that they don't look at "who is to blame", it's strictly who pays for what according to the CC&Rs and insurance policies. He said it's a common mistake that associations/boards can make - they assume that because the source of the damage originated in the common elements that the association is responsible for all resulting damage. I actually had experience (twice) with mold that originated outside of my unit - once in a leaky pipe in the unit above my nest door neighbor and once from rain water seeping into an exterior wall due to improper grading. Both times the association fixed the issues in the common areas (the leaky pipe and the grading), but I was responsible for all repairs inside my unit.

The only time I'm aware of where "who's to blame" is considered is if there is a lawsuit where the affected parties come to some sort of settlement. But as I said earlier, that's the expensive ways to handle things.

I second LetA's comment about buying "as is". The buyer understands that they don't get to argue about the condition of the home afterwards because they agreed to it when they signed the purchase agreement. The buyer is betting that the low purchase price will compensate for the money that have to put into the property after the sale. And sometimes it doesn't work out, because auctions often state that prospective buyers can't inspect the property ahead of time (or at best they get a one time walk through, which won't reveal hidden damage).

I also second the comments about the board consulting an HOA attorney who represents your association. The manager's attorney represents the manager, not the HOA, and has a conflict of interest in this case.

Do your homework, make sure you're on solid ground regarding your responsibilities, and hang tough. The other owners in your community aren't responsible helping a real estate investor (the new condo owner) earn his money.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
My question would be what type of auction?

Tax auction?
Foreclosure auction?
Sales auction ran by the realtor?
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 03/03/2024 4:04 AM
Posted By LetA on 03/02/2024 3:51 PM
Posted By SheliaH on 03/02/2024 1:56 PM
Why isn't this owner going after the previous owner since it wasn't disclosed? This is the danger of buying a house at auction - it may be dirt cheap, but can also mean tbe last owner no longer cared what happened because he/she/they were going to lose it anyway. Sometimes people can get these homes inspected before the sale, but most times nit, so you pays your money and take your chances.

Personally, I'd skip paying for everything else except the roof since that appears to be common area an HOA responsibility. Check 6our documents to see whose responsible for what and check 5hat against tge master insurance policy. It may be this owner will have to duke it out with the former owner (good luck with finding him/her/them) or bite tge bullet and foot the bill.


When someone buys a property as-is, disclosure is a moot point.


No, disclosures are required always.

"As is" IS the disclosure.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CathyA3 on 03/03/2024 6:42 AM
Posted By TerriS6 on 03/03/2024 4:04 AM
Posted By LetA on 03/02/2024 3:51 PM
Posted By SheliaH on 03/02/2024 1:56 PM
Why isn't this owner going after the previous owner since it wasn't disclosed? This is the danger of buying a house at auction - it may be dirt cheap, but can also mean tbe last owner no longer cared what happened because he/she/they were going to lose it anyway. Sometimes people can get these homes inspected before the sale, but most times nit, so you pays your money and take your chances.

Personally, I'd skip paying for everything else except the roof since that appears to be common area an HOA responsibility. Check 6our documents to see whose responsible for what and check 5hat against tge master insurance policy. It may be this owner will have to duke it out with the former owner (good luck with finding him/her/them) or bite tge bullet and foot the bill.


When someone buys a property as-is, disclosure is a moot point.


No, disclosures are required always.


"As is" IS the disclosure.

One might think so but California requires several mandatory disclosures even though the sales agreement says "as is."
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
California Assoc. of Realtors purchase agreement form definition of "As-is." "Means that Seller shall make full disclosure of known material facts and defects as of the date of Acceptance and perform only those repairs specified in this Agreement, and Buyer shall have the right to inspect the property and exercise any contingency cancellation specified in this Agreement."
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
I think the question becomes:

Is the roof still leaking?

In other words, did the COA patch the leak and then look for funds to replace the roof OR did the COA acknowledge the leak, realize the roof needed replaced and are doing nothing about the existing leak until enough funds are gathered to replace the roof?
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
To add to Cathy’s observations about “HOA company said due to the roof leaking and causing mold they say we have to cover the repair.” I agree with her that this might NOT be true. Review your HOA insurance policy to see what it covers. Even if from the common area, damage to my condo unit that insurance covers only is the walls, ceilings, and subfloor if damaged. Insurance doesn’t cover cabinets, baseboards, i.e “improvements” as defined in your CC&Rs.

I think it’s likely the HOA insurance does not cover mold, which should have been noticed by the previous owners. Remediation of that very well may be the buyer’s responsibility. Even if caused by a common area problem. Has your insurance agent seen the damage? S/he will be able to tell you WHAT the HOA will cover. By the way, have you been in the unit to inspect the damage?

I’m a long-time Owner in a multi story condo building and was on the Board for a number of years. I know CA HOA statutes pretty well and my own governing documents very well. But, in your case, Vincent, with the buyer already being aggressive, your Board needs the opinion of a qualified HOA attorney to protect your HOA/community.

I am sorry your Board is stuck with the consequences of previous Boards who failed to fund reserves properly and apparently failed to have regular termite inspections. Say, is your community manger certified or credentialed in any way?

(You do NOT want a real estate attorney. It is not the Board’s concern whether the buyer got proper disclosure, etc. That’s on him. As an long-ago, long-time poster used to shout: Caveat emptor!)

CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 03/03/2024 7:34 AM
California Assoc. of Realtors purchase agreement form definition of "As-is." "Means that Seller shall make full disclosure of known material facts and defects as of the date of Acceptance and perform only those repairs specified in this Agreement, and Buyer shall have the right to inspect the property and exercise any contingency cancellation specified in this Agreement."

The problem is that if a home is acquired through an auction, the owner will be either the HOA, the lender or the taxing authority. None of these entities will know enough about a condo in order to do a meaningful disclosure that a buyer can rely on. In my state, the disclosure form has a statement at the bottom that the seller has to sign stating that the information is accurate. If a disclosure document can become evidence in a legal dispute (always a possibility), then only persons who have personal knowledge of the home's history should complete and sign it. Anything else gets into hearsay.

Acquiring real estate through a foreclosure auction really is a gamble, and sometimes the gamble won't pay off.
DeanJ
Posts: 1,786
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By VincentD1 on 03/02/2024 1:25 PM
In our CA Condo complex we have a new owner who bought their unit in auction site unseen. The property has significant damage the previous owner did not disclose. The roof is leaking which the HOA is in the process of getting money to replace. The new owner is requesting the HOA to make all the repairs which include remediation, wood rot replacement, and fumigation. Was looking to see if anyone knows laws or guidelines that stipulate who is responsible for these repairs that have become tens of thousands of dollars due to neglect and not notifying the HOA?

Thanks for the assistance in advance.

So I am an owner in your HOA and winter 4 months at another location. The roof leaks and you tell me the damage is my fault for not having someone check the unit and report issues?

In my view the previous owner paid the HOA for the proper maintenance of the roof and is under no obligation to report anything . All the damage is on the HOA.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DeanJ on 03/09/2024 4:52 AM
Posted By VincentD1 on 03/02/2024 1:25 PM
In our CA Condo complex we have a new owner who bought their unit in auction site unseen. The property has significant damage the previous owner did not disclose. The roof is leaking which the HOA is in the process of getting money to replace. The new owner is requesting the HOA to make all the repairs which include remediation, wood rot replacement, and fumigation. Was looking to see if anyone knows laws or guidelines that stipulate who is responsible for these repairs that have become tens of thousands of dollars due to neglect and not notifying the HOA?

Thanks for the assistance in advance.


So I am an owner in your HOA and winter 4 months at another location. The roof leaks and you tell me the damage is my fault for not having someone check the unit and report issues?

In my view the previous owner paid the HOA for the proper maintenance of the roof and is under no obligation to report anything . All the damage is on the HOA.

Look in the CC&Rs. In mine, under the article that describes unit owner responsibilities is a statement saying that owners are required to promptly report any issues in areas that the association is responsible for maintaining. That's pretty typical for condos.

So yes, it is your fault, although the correct word is "responsibility". The responsibility doesn't shift to the association if you are away from home. That's on you. If you're going to be away, you should have someone check on your home periodically.*

That said, the CC&Rs don't care who is "at fault" and neither does the insurer, at least according to insurance agent. It's strictly who pays for what according to the CC&Rs and the insurance policies. If you want to argue blame, you're probably looking at lawyering up and fighting it out in court. It will likely be less costly and quicker to just pay for the necessary repairs, even if you turn in an insurance claim and end up with higher premiums as a result.

(* Horror story: One of our residents in a second floor condo went away for the Christmas holiday, and had a friend come by to check on her home. Good for her. What she didn't do was shut off the water, and she turned the heat way down. This was December. In Ohio. Friend came by to check, found water gushing, rooms flooded, drywall hanging off the framing. End result: the unit and the one below had to be totally gutted. Fortunately the unit below was empty, so that owner's personal belongings weren't destroyed. On the other hand, the problem would have been found sooner if that person had been home.)

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here