💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AnthonyS9 (Illinois)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Hey all-

Wondering if anyone knows if I have any recourse here, with the private path behind my house, and what that could potentially look like. I live in the State of Illinois.

When I purchased my home, I had concerns about a path cutting through my backyard- if it was a public path, there was no way we were going to purchase the home. However, after reading through the bylaws, and looking at the plat of survey, it became clear the path was a private path, exclusive to the members of our community only. See below clause directly out of our bylaws stating our property has no dedication to public use:

"3.6 No Dedication to Public Use. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Declaration, nothing contained in this Declaration shall be construed or be deemed to constitute a dedication, express or implied, of any part of the Premises to or for any public use or purpose whatsoever."

So, after confirming this path was indeed private, we executed on the purchase of the home. However, after having lived here for five years, and trying everything to contain and control access, nothing is working.

We live in a community that, at one time, had nothing surrounding it approximately 30 years ago. Since then, neighboring communities have been built, and commercial properties established nearby- malls, car dealerships, mechanic shops, coffee shops, etc. Needless to say, anyone with a phone can see there is a nice path going around an approximate 4-acre pond behind 12 of 232 houses here, which leads to different paths that fork off through two different nature paths. We have put up no trespassing signs that state it's exclusivity to our Members only. And we have notified neighboring HOA's to stay off of our private property. However, people just continue to trespass or use the area at the back of my house as a recreational area, without regard for any posted signs.

To make matters worse, I can't install a fence, and the shrubs we have placed against the path, just draw in people with domestic pets and children. They cross over a plastic chain and posts I have installed along my side of the walkway, and literally play in my backyard (it's about a 1 acre yard), or let their dogs run through my shrubs and defecate on my lawn. Generally, the people doing this, are all from outside this community..

I have asked our Association to start enforcing trespass. I have sent a drone up directly over my property and have followed people on video recording to their houses not within this Association. I have produced all of that evidence to my Association, along with their addresses showing that trespass continues to exist, daily. My Master Association refuses to enforce the trespass, and since I am a member, I have no authority to sign a complaint against said trespassers.

So, I guess the question is, what do we do next and do we have any recourse whatsoever? My bylaws say that no member should be placed at a disadvantage compared to others. And, well, all I want is the trespassers to go away. They are not, and we have a growing chorus of members on my side of the pond who want the path removed in its entirety since there is no way to control access. And since our Master will simply not enforce the trespass, I don't know what to do anymore to compel them to fix the issue.

ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
I advise seeking a real estate attorney so you can refine your options. Prepare by studying up on "prescriptive easement" and "derivative action."

After many years of the public using this path, it is possible that the public has what is called a "prescriptive easement" for use of the path.

Maybe the big question is whether members of the public would fight the HOA if and when the HOA comes after alleged trespassers, with the members of the public claiming "prescriptive easement."

A derivative action is a lawsuit where a shareholder/HOA member brings a suit to protect the rights of the corporation. For example, if the directors are harming the corporation, then a HOA member could bring suit to stop the harm the directors are causing. Here the harm might be the board refusing to enforce the corporation's property rights. Certain requirements have to be met before bringing a derivative action.

In any case, long before anyone goes to court the attorneys involved will send a series of demand letters. The demand letters' essence would be, "The covenants say this easement is not open to the public. Yet the public is using the easement regularly. Please take action against the trespassers. If you do not, then I will start having to consider elevating this." The tone will elevate to the point of threatening a lawsuit.

No one here is an attorney. But many here know a lot of HOA law and real estate law.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Anthony,

You can enforce the trespassing on your property.

Contact the police and see what has to be done. Often there are specifics on signage color and posting heights.

I would caution using a drone to follow people, as that could be interpreted as stalking.
AnthonyS9 (Illinois)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 02/27/2024 1:53 AM
Anthony,

You can enforce the trespassing on your property.

Contact the police and see what has to be done. Often there are specifics on signage color and posting heights.

I would caution using a drone to follow people, as that could be interpreted as stalking.

Thank you. I was told as long as the drone is over my property, and so long as people are walking around the path, they lose all expectation of privacy. I simply capture the footage of them trespassing, and then follow at 400ft with the camera until I see which property they return to. If they are within this association, the video is immediately purged. If they are not, it is saved and turned over to the Master Association.
AnthonyS9 (Illinois)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 02/26/2024 3:11 PM
I advise seeking a real estate attorney so you can refine your options. Prepare by studying up on "prescriptive easement" and "derivative action."

After many years of the public using this path, it is possible that the public has what is called a "prescriptive easement" for use of the path.

Maybe the big question is whether members of the public would fight the HOA if and when the HOA comes after alleged trespassers, with the members of the public claiming "prescriptive easement."

A derivative action is a lawsuit where a shareholder/HOA member brings a suit to protect the rights of the corporation. For example, if the directors are harming the corporation, then a HOA member could bring suit to stop the harm the directors are causing. Here the harm might be the board refusing to enforce the corporation's property rights. Certain requirements have to be met before bringing a derivative action.

In any case, long before anyone goes to court the attorneys involved will send a series of demand letters. The demand letters' essence would be, "The covenants say this easement is not open to the public. Yet the public is using the easement regularly. Please take action against the trespassers. If you do not, then I will start having to consider elevating this." The tone will elevate to the point of threatening a lawsuit.

No one here is an attorney. But many here know a lot of HOA law and real estate law.

Thanks! I doubt there would be counter suit of prescriptive easement. I'd have to look into it, but I assume there has to be some stipulations surrounding this. One of which would most likely be time. I know the people trespassing are relatively new to the surrounding communities. And the signage which says no trespassing and states the Association which are allowed to be there. Not clear how they would have much of a case since we pay for all the upkeep. Blacktopping, paving, landscaping, tree care, etc. We have not abandoned the property and very much maintain it.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AnthonyS9 on 02/27/2024 6:36 AM
If they are not, it is saved and turned over to the Master Association.

Why not call the police yourself and make a complaint, using the video as proof?
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
The board is required to abate a nuisance. Would be interesting to read what your Declaration says about that.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
If enough members are interested, perhaps propose a capital improvement of locked gates/fencing with member-only access, just as a swimming pool enclosure.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
In California, recreational use of private property can never ripen into a prescriptive easement (thank you, Peter Behr).
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Here is some good reading. There might be some points to help you. https://casetext.com/case/dolan-v-city-of-tigard-3
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 02/28/2024 7:14 AM
In California, recreational use of private property can never ripen into a prescriptive easement (thank you, Peter Behr).
In California it can never ripen into a public prescriptive easement. Use of private property "for recreational purposes" (including accessing areas open to the public for recreation) can ripen into a private prescriptive easement.

Your "cited" case law is binding in Oregon and nowhere else.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
From Dolan: "Such public access would deprive petitioner of the right to exclude others, "one of the most essential sicks in the bundle of rights tat are commonly characterized as property." Kaiser Aetna v. United States, 444 U.S. 164, 176 (1979).
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 02/28/2024 7:41 AM
Posted By TerriS6 on 02/28/2024 7:14 AM
In California, recreational use of private property can never ripen into a prescriptive easement (thank you, Peter Behr).
In California it can never ripen into a public prescriptive easement. Use of private property "for recreational purposes" (including accessing areas open to the public for recreation) can ripen into a private prescriptive easement.

Your "cited" case law is binding in Oregon and nowhere else.

Your statement is false regarding prescriptive easements CA Civ Code sec 1008.

The Oregon case is U.S. Supreme Court decision which was cited so the poster can decide for himself if anything will help him, e.g. the right to exclude others being a primary property right.

TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 02/28/2024 7:41 AM
Posted By TerriS6 on 02/28/2024 7:14 AM
In California, recreational use of private property can never ripen into a prescriptive easement (thank you, Peter Behr).
In California it can never ripen into a public prescriptive easement. Use of private property "for recreational purposes" (including accessing areas open to the public for recreation) can ripen into a private prescriptive easement.

Your "cited" case law is binding in Oregon and nowhere else.

Your obsession with trying to prove others wrong is tiresome.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 02/28/2024 7:51 AM
Posted By ElleN on 02/28/2024 7:41 AM
Posted By TerriS6 on 02/28/2024 7:14 AM
In California, recreational use of private property can never ripen into a prescriptive easement (thank you, Peter Behr).
In California it can never ripen into a public prescriptive easement. Use of private property "for recreational purposes" (including accessing areas open to the public for recreation) can ripen into a private prescriptive easement.

Your "cited" case law is binding in Oregon and nowhere else.


Your statement is false regarding prescriptive easements CA Civ Code sec 1008.
People can look up Civ Code 1008 and see your statement is highly inaccurate.

Civil Code 1009 is applicable as well.
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 02/28/2024 7:51 AM
The Oregon case is U.S. Supreme Court decision
No, it is not.

None of what you posted from the case law has relevance here.

If you post something that changes my mind, I will respond further. Else my statements stand.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
The issue is not that Dolan v. City of Tigard is, in fact, a U.S. Supreme Court case, the issue is that the poster may find something valuable for his own situation, e.g., his right as an owner of the path to exclude others.

Housing Affordability Institute’s Legal Precedents outlines influential, precedent-setting court decisions at the state and federal levels and illustrates their impact on housing and development.
FEDERAL LEGAL PRECEDENTS
Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994) is a United States Supreme Court case establishing the limits of conditional approval in zoning and takings claims. Dolan sought approval from the City of Tigard, Oregon, to expand the business’s building and pave the parking lot. The City of Dolan’s planning commission conditioned the approval on donating land to the city for use of a public greenway, to which Dolan objected. Dolan eventually made its way to the Supreme Court of the United States.
In 1994 the United States Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the City of Tigard’s actions constituted an uncompensated taking of property.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Having personal experience with the issues of excluding recreational users from private property, and from acquiring any prescriptive easements, what I wrote was to address an issue brought up. Who are you to determine which posts are relevant or not.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 02/28/2024 8:59 AM
Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994) is a United States Supreme Court case
My bone-headed bad. It is a U. S. Supreme Court case. With no relevance IMO.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 02/28/2024 7:10 AM
The board is required to abate a nuisance.

That would vary association to association based on wording within the governing documents.

Mostly, the Board and the Member have rights to enforce but rarely a requirement to enforce.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 02/28/2024 1:10 PM
Posted By TerriS6 on 02/28/2024 7:10 AM
The board is required to abate a nuisance.


That would vary association to association based on wording within the governing documents.

Mostly, the Board and the Member have rights to enforce but rarely a requirement to enforce.

And that is why I wrote the second sentence that you didn't quote.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 02/28/2024 1:18 PM
Posted By TimB4 on 02/28/2024 1:10 PM
Posted By TerriS6 on 02/28/2024 7:10 AM
The board is required to abate a nuisance.


That would vary association to association based on wording within the governing documents.

Mostly, the Board and the Member have rights to enforce but rarely a requirement to enforce.


And that is why I wrote the second sentence that you didn't quote.

That is not what I read.

You made two statements:
1) The board is required to abate
2) You would like to see what the declaration had to say about it.

Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 02/28/2024 7:10 AM
The board is required to abate a nuisance. Would be interesting to read what your Declaration says about that.

TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
I made one statement. The fact is if the docs prohibit nuisances the board is required to abate them. If the docs do not mention nuisances it’s irrelevant.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Terri,

I'm not going down the rabbit hole of what was said, how it was said, etc.

I made a statement based on what you posted.
You questioned me about that statement.
I replied with my reasoning on why I made that statement.

Everyone is free to determine for themselves what the meaning of something was or wasn't.

TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
In CA, a board has a duty to enforce the governing documents/restrictions and to investigate complaints of members.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here