RichardC29 (Florida)
Posts: 37
Posts: 37
Posted:
We just learned that a non property owner was appointed to the bod,when discovered that the director dident own property the bod sent out a notice saying the person was properly vetted after a records search it was discovered this person wasn’t on any deed,our governing documents require all directors to be property owners.
This conflicts with the doah case In front of doah courts this fake director was involved in many aspects of the revitilization,including sending out asking for written consents ,authorizing payment to lawyers talking to the lawyers who now claim attorney client privilege even thou the person was never eligable to be a director in the first place,now the corporate veil is wide open.this is in the state of Florida.now all the written consents are in question as not one of the written consents was signed by all owners of record.
This conflicts with the doah case In front of doah courts this fake director was involved in many aspects of the revitilization,including sending out asking for written consents ,authorizing payment to lawyers talking to the lawyers who now claim attorney client privilege even thou the person was never eligable to be a director in the first place,now the corporate veil is wide open.this is in the state of Florida.now all the written consents are in question as not one of the written consents was signed by all owners of record.