Quote:
Posted By CathyA3 on 02/05/2024 7:41 AM
If you're going to pay them, you'll have to worry about things like insuring them properly (workers comp, liability, etc.). In short, we found that using volunteers is often more trouble than it's worth and that you often don't save any money. If you pay them, you're eliminating the one rationale for doing this. More importantly, POOLS CAN BE REGULATED by state law. You don't want clueless volunteers in charge of keeping you on the sunny side of the law and avoiding lawsuits.
I'll sum up my usual shtick about using volunteers in HOAs:
* They're not free. And once volunteers accept payment, they lose the protections of the Volunteer Protection Act (volunteers can't be held liable for their actions in carrying out their duties).
* You don't get professional quality work. You won't get any warranties or guarantees, and they may void existing warranties if they don't know what they're doing. Volunteers can walk off the job any time with no notice.
* Homeowners may not obey their neighbors (as with a pool monitor) and may encourage conflict. (You'd be amazed at what people will fight about, and pools seem to encourage squabbles.)
* It's not sustainable. Just because you have willing volunteers today doesn't mean you'll have them in the future.
* It misleads homeowner about the true cost of ownership if these tasks are ordinarily performed by professionals. This can be a problem in states and communities where there are limits in how much assessments can be increased.
* The board must supervise the volunteers, adding to the board's existing workload. This is especially true if the "volunteers" accept payment.
volunteer protection act allows payments up to $500 per year.
our volunteers get more professional work than the ones we used to pay for planting flowers. Contracts can walk of the job and quit anytime too.
Board has to supervise contractors too.
half of your arguments make no sense to me.