💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KrystaT (Florida)
Posts: 58
Posted:
Hi, We are currently making R&R's for our neighborhood. As our CCR's are now, there's nothing about landscaping. Our community is different from many others in the area b/c the developers left the nice old oak trees that were already on the lots. Well, it's becoming a "fad" in our neighborhood for everyone to cut their trees down, and leave an UGLY stump. One is my neighbor, and the tree was 1/2 mine, he didn't ask, cut it down and left a stump. Another is at the front entrance, and effected the whole look of our entranceway which also has a 3 FOOT stump sticking up for everyone to see as they drive in.

My question is can I make and enforce a rule that states no one can cut down their trees w/o first asking the landscape committee? AND if the tree is cut down the stump must be removed as well?

I'm curious b/c all the hurricanes in FL. Do the homeowners have a right to cut them down to protect their home that would over-ride the proposed rule?
OR can the rule state trimming is ok. as long as the whole tree is not removed?
Please advise..
ShawnaF (Colorado)
Posts: 84
Posted:
FYI on Oaks - and look for info in your state - some areas do not allow you to cut down an Oak without authorization from the County/City. I've seen this along the West Coast, but don't have experience elsewhere. It might be a possibility that the developer left them there because the approval required them there!
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
KrystaT: You state that they are 'their trees'. Is this correct? I would want to learn who owns the ground the trees are on...is it considered common ground and the Assn.'s responsibility for lawn maintenance/tree pruning, etc.? Or, is the ground on which the trees are planted deeded to the owners with proof of lot dimensions shown on the plat plan?

If the trees are on common ground, no resident owner has the right to do anything since they do not own the ground or the trees.

DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Krysta,
What a shame and really dumb thing for them to do. Those really old oaks have withstood many years of hurricanes and lived thru them.

First of all, do you have an "architectural board or committee? That would be how to regulate the removal of the trees. My developement does not allow any tree removal if the tree is larger than a 3 inch caliper (trunk diameter) without a replacement of the tree. YES, you can make rules and regs to protect them.

You definitely need to check with your County Urban planning and developement because ALL developements in Florida are regulated as to how much green area is on the original platts. These rouges with chainsaws might be required to replace the trees that they cut down.
MikeS1
Posts: 668
Posted:
Some counties have arborists that have to approve this and in some cases were the home might be within 1000ft of a watershed or in a RPA (Resource Protection Area), they may need special permission.

Although your docs don't mention landscaping specifically, the residents ARE definately making changes to their lot or home per se. Most docs specifically say that major landscaping plans must be approved. I'm surprised that there is nothing at all in your docs.

KrystaT (Florida)
Posts: 58
Posted:
I will call on monday and check with the state, county and city on the tree cutting procedures. I can understand pruning and maintenance, but like DonnaS said "rogues with chainsaws" is ridiculous. Those trees have lasted through 5 hurricanes since I've lived here(2004, 2005)How about ASK before you chop down a 100 yr. old tree that is shared property. Then to leave a hideous HUGE stump!!! At least cut it even with the ground. Don't leave 3 feet of tree sticking up out of the ground! I am sending a letter out to try to make them remove the stump.

MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
That's really sad.

I wonder if they realize how important those trees are? Probably not.

At any rate, our HOA's CC&Rs do not allow ANY tree removal without first getting WRITTEN APPROVAL from the board of directors.

To be honest, no one has ever cut one down yet, and I have NO idea how we would handle/process the request. In other words, I have NO idea on what criteria we would base an approval or denial.

MikeS1
Posts: 668
Posted:
Krysta - What did you mean by your reference to "shared property"? Are the trees on Common Area? ...or please explain..
KrystaT (Florida)
Posts: 58
Posted:
No, the trees aren't on the regular common areas. I have to check with the state/county/city to see if they are protected in any way on the plat and are indeed common areas in the terms of a governing agency.

When I refered to "shared property" I was noting the fact that the tree was on the lot line. The tree was 1/2 mine, 1/2 my neighbors. HE cut it down, without so much as a word to me.

One of the other trees was on the first lot at the entrance to the subdivision. There was one tree on each side on the lots near the street, and it made a beautiful natural canopy entranceway, one at the entrance, one at the exit. It's hard to explain...but in cutting down that tree, it ruined the whole look of the front entranceway. A stump is the first thing you see when you enter into our neighborhood.

The thing is, when if I write a letter and make these people remove their stumps, and even replant, there's nothing to replace a 100 yr old tree. (I know it's that old, I counted the rings.)There's nothing that can make our entranceway look like that again.

GeraldT4
Posts: 1,022
Posted:
KrystaT - If the trees are not on common ground than the restriction (if any) and procedure to cut them down would be governed by the municipality, local code. A proper landscape should depend on more than just one tree, no matter how beautiful the mighty Oak. Someone needs to make an attempt to get the stumps ground down to alleviate the eyesore. The HOA should write a letter to all owners explaining that if they are to remove a tree, these are the recommended guidelines, #1 be considerate of your neighbor and discuss the removal in advance.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
KrystaT: Nothing can be determined from "No, the trees aren't on the regular common areas." The defining factor is if any resident actually OWNS ANY GROUND other than perhaps what their unit sits on. Very often they do not.

A tree on a lot line may appear it belongs to 2 owners, however, the ground may not belong to any owner, but common ground to the Assn. Keep us posted!
The County will be helpful to you.

HaroldS (Arizona)
Posts: 906
Posted:
If there are no county rules, I suppose you realize your new rules cannot be retroactive.
I'm curious where you were all the time your neighbor was cutting down your shared tree? That's sorta hard to miss, and not something done in an hour or two. I would think tho that you have a legal claim against your neighbor for doing this. Harold
KrystaT (Florida)
Posts: 58
Posted:
NEW TWIST....After examining the front what used to be a tree, I noticed that the tree was ON THE COMMON AREA!!! His fence marks his property, and the tree was on the outside of the fencemark.

The lot is the first corner lot when you drive in, so the wall and landscape area are adjacent to his lot. Also there's a 10ft easement. Where the tree was in NOT w/in his lot parameters...

What can I do? Make him but a new tree and replant?? Does it have to be the same size/description tree?
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Krysta,
New Twist? This is your answer. He is in violation of cutting a tree down from common property. Period!!! The tree was a large Oak and cannot be replaced as it was because of the size.

The Board will need to write a letter and do include the wording from your documents where it describes where the common property is. Include anything that will back up the decision to have the tree replaced. Charge him full replacement costs but you will have to compromise on the size.

Also, send out a letter to all homeowners stateing that the trees are not allowed to be cut. Make an adendum to your Rules and Regs, stateing the CC&Rs concerning landscape, ARC and maintenance covenants. Good going!
MikeS1
Posts: 668
Posted:
While it's true that the tree really cannot be replaced, I suggest that you work with a Tree expert and try to figure out what's fair. Just do what municipalites do whenever a buider, developer or resident cuts a tree or trees in a RPA (Resource Protection Area) which is normally located within a 1000 ft of a watershed. Although you can't get them to replace the ONE tree, you can certainly get them to replace it with MANY OR SEVERAL TREES.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here