Quote:
Posted By MichaelS56 on 01/31/2024 4:41 AM
I do not understand how directors are different than Board of Directors. Our Board members determine which Board member will be which officer. They know they are volunteers and there is no compensation for their work. Are the officers, if different from Board members elected?
The membership elect individuals to serve as Directors (i.e. the Board of Directors).
Directors (required by Corporate law and most, if not all, governing documents) make the decisions for the Association (should we hire people (PM, bookkeeper, etc.), who to award a contract to, do we foreclose, do we bring legal action, how to respond to x, approve policy changes, etc.).
Officers (required by Corporate law and most, if not all, governing documents) implement the decisions of the board and carry out the day to day tasks of running an association (Collect mail, track payments, make deposits, pay bills, file the taxes and annual report, sign contracts with contractors, oversee contractors, hire people, oversee work, maintain records of the Association, handle complaints, investigate violations, etc.).
Larger Associations may actually hire employees to perform many of those tasks. Self managed associations may do all of the tasks themselves. However, all Associations must have both (Directors and Officers).
Often, there simply are not enough volunteers or money to hire individuals. When this occurs (which is typically the case) the Directors appoint officers from amongst themselves. Essentially, the individuals then have two different jobs at the same company.
However, as you pointed out, many do not understand the difference between Directors and Officers. I would suspect that many who serve on their board do not understand the differences.
Therefore, when an Association pays it's Officers, and when Officers and Directors are the same individual, the perception is that the Directors are being paid to serve.
This is why it's best, if needed, to hire a bookkeeper to help the Treasurer and, if needed, to hire a PM to help the Secretary and other Officers perform their duties.
The appointed Officers are still accountable for the work to get done. They simply assigned the physical task to someone else.
Hope this helps,
Tim