Quote:
Posted By DebbieP15 on 12/10/2023 1:21 AM
[minor editing by ElleN, for readability] I am currently on a committee discussing changing the by laws. Less than 15% of the [lots?] are undeveloped. The president wants to restrict the size of the houses that can be built on [the lots?] below his house. Can we change that when it affects so few people? The development has been in existence since the 70's. I believe we should place these restrictions for so few.
As others noted, this proposed change involves a proposed new
restriction on
land use. It would require an amendment to the HOA's covenants (a.k.a. "CC&Rs", "Declaration" and other terms), not the bylaws. Do you understand the difference? If not, ask questions about this.
Anyone who thinks the bylaws can be amended to impose this new restriction is being either cute, ignorant or both.
If the board does not understand this, urge the board to consult an attorney.
Finally and most importantly, it is highly unlikely that the covenants allow the board alone to amend the covenants. An amendment to the covenants would almost assuredly require a vote of the owners, pursuant to the covenants' section on amendments. You want to look up the latter in the covenants.
Typically a super-majority of owners must vote for such an amendment.
The fun part is that when any such proposed amendment is discussed among owners, someone can point out the interesting coincidence of the location of the lots affected relative to the president-director's house. I loathe directors who practice self-favoritism.
Someone might also point out that Missouri laws require might require the president-director to disclose this conflict of interest.