BillD16 (Texas)
Posts: 971
Posts: 971
Posted:
Hi all. It's been awhile, sorry. Between trying to disengage from it all, and then getting depressed over the situation when I think about it, I simply haven't had the energy to try to put anything down in words. Not that I expect that anyone has been on the edge of their seat. But y'all have been very helpful, and I feel some obligation to follow up on matters I've asked about here. But if you don't want to read this, I get it. As I'm writing this I'm reminded of comedian Lenny Bruce when he was being tried for obscenity, and reportedly his act deteriorated into him reading excerpts from court records ... ouch. I don't wanna be like that. I'll summarize first, and then provide details:
Summary: I discovered that our PM has been lying to me. In fact, the last time I posted here, it was over something that (I discovered this morning) was a lie. What can I / should I do about it?
Brief and Rough Details:
October 18: At an Open Meeting, 3 members of the Board attempt a 'coup' and vote to de-President me.
November 8 through November 21: the HOA attorney, our PM, and even one of the backstabber Board members publicly acknowledges that they screwed up and I'm still the President. The backstabber wrote:
Frankly, there hasn't been much going on, HOA-wise. I looked into a defamation suit and just suing in general, and - it's expensive, but what really turned me off was warnings from many of you about just how toxic such lawsuits can be in a person's life. Then this morning I was made aware that our PM has been lying to me:
Back on November 8 I posted here, based on what our PM had told me:
> Okay, Iâll make it short: So my Board voted to de-President me last month.
> This morning I find out that three of the 5 Board members âvotedâ via email
> to close a violation/$50 fine (on DBLadyâs landlord). I didnât know about it
> / they didnât include me because it was a âconflict of interestâ. Our PM
> grudgingly told me about this when I asked him this morning.
I believe the general consensus was "that's not kosher" according to TPC 209.0051.
This morning I discovered that I'd been lied to. The vote to close the violation was initiated by our PM:
On October 26, our PM wrote to the Board (but excluding me):
> Mr. Landlord has stated if the violation fine and violation are
> removed that he does not need a Board hearing. Would you like
> for me to remove these?
On October 31 our PM removed the violation and fine from the Violations database. The PM sent me copies of emails from November 1 and November 7 where it appeared that other Board members had voted to remove the fine, ie "Yes, PM, please waive the fine".
In short: it appears that what really happened was that our PM asked select Board members about removing the fine, then removed the fine, and shortly thereafter a couple of Board members responded "yes, remove it".
So: the PM lied to me. On one hand, I kind've understand where he's coming from: he foresees me going away and doesn't want to upset his new masters. And he's probably okay with the notion that his job will be easier because his new masters won't ask him to do much.
On the other hand: he flat out lied to me. And I've become convinced that he's not really interested in handling work items; more like: he wants work items to go away so he's not bothered by them.
I'm debating reporting him to his mgmt. I'm not a big fan of "let me speak to your manager!" but this might be a case where it is justified. And: I'll spare you the details, but this isn't the first time he's lied.
Thoughts?
Ironically, yesterday I decided it was time to resign as President, and I spent last night "sleeping on it". Only to discover this issue first thing in the morning.
Bill
PS: I'm still going to resign. It'll be something short, like "I resign". Although I'm open for suggestions on how to make it 'bite' a bit more.
Summary: I discovered that our PM has been lying to me. In fact, the last time I posted here, it was over something that (I discovered this morning) was a lie. What can I / should I do about it?
Brief and Rough Details:
October 18: At an Open Meeting, 3 members of the Board attempt a 'coup' and vote to de-President me.
November 8 through November 21: the HOA attorney, our PM, and even one of the backstabber Board members publicly acknowledges that they screwed up and I'm still the President. The backstabber wrote:
Bill is still President until we reconfirm our vote to remove him. We can do that at any time and it does not have to take place in an open meeting. It is best dealt with discreetly.
Frankly, there hasn't been much going on, HOA-wise. I looked into a defamation suit and just suing in general, and - it's expensive, but what really turned me off was warnings from many of you about just how toxic such lawsuits can be in a person's life. Then this morning I was made aware that our PM has been lying to me:
Back on November 8 I posted here, based on what our PM had told me:
> Okay, Iâll make it short: So my Board voted to de-President me last month.
> This morning I find out that three of the 5 Board members âvotedâ via email
> to close a violation/$50 fine (on DBLadyâs landlord). I didnât know about it
> / they didnât include me because it was a âconflict of interestâ. Our PM
> grudgingly told me about this when I asked him this morning.
I believe the general consensus was "that's not kosher" according to TPC 209.0051.
This morning I discovered that I'd been lied to. The vote to close the violation was initiated by our PM:
On October 26, our PM wrote to the Board (but excluding me):
> Mr. Landlord has stated if the violation fine and violation are
> removed that he does not need a Board hearing. Would you like
> for me to remove these?
On October 31 our PM removed the violation and fine from the Violations database. The PM sent me copies of emails from November 1 and November 7 where it appeared that other Board members had voted to remove the fine, ie "Yes, PM, please waive the fine".
In short: it appears that what really happened was that our PM asked select Board members about removing the fine, then removed the fine, and shortly thereafter a couple of Board members responded "yes, remove it".
So: the PM lied to me. On one hand, I kind've understand where he's coming from: he foresees me going away and doesn't want to upset his new masters. And he's probably okay with the notion that his job will be easier because his new masters won't ask him to do much.
On the other hand: he flat out lied to me. And I've become convinced that he's not really interested in handling work items; more like: he wants work items to go away so he's not bothered by them.
I'm debating reporting him to his mgmt. I'm not a big fan of "let me speak to your manager!" but this might be a case where it is justified. And: I'll spare you the details, but this isn't the first time he's lied.
Thoughts?
Ironically, yesterday I decided it was time to resign as President, and I spent last night "sleeping on it". Only to discover this issue first thing in the morning.
Bill
PS: I'm still going to resign. It'll be something short, like "I resign". Although I'm open for suggestions on how to make it 'bite' a bit more.
HOA Board ex-President
Austin, Texas USA
âYou canât put too much water in a nuclear reactorâ
Austin, Texas USA
âYou canât put too much water in a nuclear reactorâ