πŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RichardC29 (Florida)
Posts: 37
Posted:
If your use restrictions and covenants where just revitalized by the dept of commerce,does that mean that all the recorded documents are now new again good for another 30 years.if that’s true then is the defects that where found in the recorded covenants such as years ago a bod wrote and changed the use restrictions without member approved.no certification was included with that amendment change. That should be allowed to be challenged in court,which means that the hoa was revitilized on fraudulent recorded covenants.the doah recently returned a case back to the dept of commerece because it had no jurisdiction on fraudulently recorded covenants.
Change my mind?
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
We aren't attorneys, so if you're asking if this should be allowed, you'll have to ask your own, and then decide if you want to take legal action (assuming you can prove all this happened as you said).

We don't live in your community either, so it's not about us "changing your mind." You have to consider the pros and cons of taking this to court, and what might happen if you win - or lose. Will everyone be happy, ticked off -or not care in the slightest? Is there another way the documents can be adjusted without having a judge ordering them to be changed? What's wrong with the current CCRs, such as they are - have you read every word or are you irked by a specific section? Maybe it would be easier to address that part instead of ripping up the whole thing.


If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • βœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • βœ“ Share your experience
  • βœ“ Get expert advice
  • βœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here