AlanH11 (New Hampshire)
Posts: 13
Posts: 13
Posted:
Hi,
Just curious on views of preventive maintenance. We have units built in 2006 thru 2023 with roofs with a 25-year life span (in theory). We had an issue with leaks in one Quad unit in which we replaced boots on pipes (from the roof) as well as resealed a few. Since we have had an issue, I am thinking of requesting all units built in the 2006-2008 range inspected. The theory is if the boots look ok, we reseal them if they look marginal, we replace them.
Overall cost would be about 3000-4000 and the money is there. The question: is this maintenance worth it? For instance, if I reseal or replace boots and we go 10 years without issues I don't know if the 10 years without an issue is because of the work completed or if it would have gone ten years without an intervention. Some say since we cannot tell we simply wait until there is an issue and address that. My concern is leaks of any kind while not all preventable causes an inconvenience to the resident and in the "worst case" scenario the repairs will not hurt.
We are self-managed and there really has been no maintenance plan in place. Everything is ad hoc or we move when the complaints are loud enough. The community is responsible for the entirety of the outside of the homes. Including roofs, siding, etc. I am new to the board (several months) and was elected President of the board. All of the members with several years exp really wanted no part of it, and I am beginning to understand why.
We Just spent $5000 o tree maintenance and while a bit of money, we will not have to address these issues for several years. The old way was to spend 600 here or 400 there depending on the issue. My thought is that this type of maintenance will save money in the long run, prevent issues before they occur and make for happier residents. However, this is "my thought" and I am wondering if this type of planning and proactive works makes sense or i am looking at it incorrectly. The board is reasonable and while no one wants to spend money foolishly they are willing if it is worthwhile. Any thoughts would be appreciated. thanks...
Just curious on views of preventive maintenance. We have units built in 2006 thru 2023 with roofs with a 25-year life span (in theory). We had an issue with leaks in one Quad unit in which we replaced boots on pipes (from the roof) as well as resealed a few. Since we have had an issue, I am thinking of requesting all units built in the 2006-2008 range inspected. The theory is if the boots look ok, we reseal them if they look marginal, we replace them.
Overall cost would be about 3000-4000 and the money is there. The question: is this maintenance worth it? For instance, if I reseal or replace boots and we go 10 years without issues I don't know if the 10 years without an issue is because of the work completed or if it would have gone ten years without an intervention. Some say since we cannot tell we simply wait until there is an issue and address that. My concern is leaks of any kind while not all preventable causes an inconvenience to the resident and in the "worst case" scenario the repairs will not hurt.
We are self-managed and there really has been no maintenance plan in place. Everything is ad hoc or we move when the complaints are loud enough. The community is responsible for the entirety of the outside of the homes. Including roofs, siding, etc. I am new to the board (several months) and was elected President of the board. All of the members with several years exp really wanted no part of it, and I am beginning to understand why.
We Just spent $5000 o tree maintenance and while a bit of money, we will not have to address these issues for several years. The old way was to spend 600 here or 400 there depending on the issue. My thought is that this type of maintenance will save money in the long run, prevent issues before they occur and make for happier residents. However, this is "my thought" and I am wondering if this type of planning and proactive works makes sense or i am looking at it incorrectly. The board is reasonable and while no one wants to spend money foolishly they are willing if it is worthwhile. Any thoughts would be appreciated. thanks...