DonaldN (Connecticut)
Posts: 183
Posts: 183
Posted:
This post is focused only on the availability and use of "undirected" proxies - we have a 5 member Board and for various reasons there could be multiple openings at any particular time - like minded unit owners could go door to door and gather enough proxies to fill enough of the vacant seats to control the outcome of voting within the Board - and on the flip side unit owners could form an alliance and collect enough proxy votes to effectively veto not only the annual budget but also a vote to accept an expensive capital improvement project.
There are many good reasons for making proxy voting available - absentee owners , illness , and in our case collecting proxy ballots for the large group of unit owners who never go to a meeting - in practice we follow state statute regarding proxy voting , i.e. both directed and undirected are acceptable .
Fellow HOA'ers help me out here : Is there any reason why in practice and per our documents we couldn't only support "directed" proxies ?
There are many good reasons for making proxy voting available - absentee owners , illness , and in our case collecting proxy ballots for the large group of unit owners who never go to a meeting - in practice we follow state statute regarding proxy voting , i.e. both directed and undirected are acceptable .
Fellow HOA'ers help me out here : Is there any reason why in practice and per our documents we couldn't only support "directed" proxies ?