Quote:
Posted By DanielN4 on 11/04/2023 12:14 PM
Last week, we had our budget vote and it was not passed by the residents of our HOA because of the huge salary increases to 3 employees. My understanding of the budget vote is that the board must abide by the previous budget and the employee raises will not be allowed. Today, I was told by a Board member that the employee raises will be approved and taken out of the general fund. Can the Board do this ? Please respond. TY
In my opinion, if the prior year's budget has a line item for staff salaries/compensation, and if the documentation for how much the staff will be paid for the coming year clearly shows a large discrepancy with the prior year's numbers, then the board is likely violating the bylaws or covenants, where the bylaws or covenants speak to the owners' right to reject a budget. Owners have the right to sue to enforce the bylaws or covenants. So far in my opinion the owners might have a good chance of prevailing here.
But I would feel better seeing exactly what last year's budget says and the documentation of the staff's compensation. Examples of where the board might have wiggle room: Operating budgets usually, and wisely, have a cushion. Sometimes this is called the "contingency fund." The contingency fund helps deal with unexpected expenses. It's possible a court would approve the use of the contingency fund to pay for the raises for staff. The board, through the HOA attorney, might say to the court, "Your honor, the board is also obliged to do xyz, per covenant 23, bylaw 79 and statute section___, all to maintain the HOA common areas. The board in its business judgment found that it could not maintain the grounds pursuant to the governing documents and statute without doing what it did. Also your honor, a budget is only a
guide. Stuff happens. Here, this stuff includes inflation and a labor market that means HOAs have a tough time competing for good staff."
The owners' attorney could give a perfectly reasonable response, about how the HOA board's interpretation renders the bylaws/covenants section on owner rejection of the budget to be toothless. The HOA attorney could respond that he agrees the section should have teeth, and yet there would seem to be some wiggle room allowed.
Whence the judge asks for final briefs on the case law; adjourns the court; and declares she will render a decision within a few months. Whence the owners, if angry enough, can recall the directors and replace them with people from their group, who will now face the tough decisions the former incumbents faced. And this is a lot of work. I suggest: Be ready to volunteer, DanielN4.