💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Hi. In our townhome community, the HOA has provided lawn service to homeowners private property, as well as the Common Areas "for years." The amount for this "service" is more than half of the monthly dues. Homeowners are not allowed to "opt out" of the service, nor have dues reduced if they decline lawn care. The Covenants specifically state that dues are collected for the repair and maintenance of the Common Areas only, and Lawn Care of individual homes is not mentioned in the Covenants anywhere. When several of us tried to approach the Board, requesting to stop lawn care, we were told we could "opt out," but not pay less in dues. When we stated the Covenants do not permit the Board/HOA to perform work on private property, we were told "it has been done for years and it is a precedent." What is your standing on this issue? Our CC&R does have a clause stating that "failure to enforce any rule of the Covenants does not preclude anyone from doing so in the future."
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
In my experience the only time "precedent" counts is when a covenant is not enforced. If a covenant is not enforced for years and certain other requirements are met, sometimes a court will rule the covenant "abandoned" and not enforceable.

Here AFAIC that's not really what is happening. Instead over the years the Declaration has been unlawfully amended to add a service. Plus owners are being billed for something the Declaration says they should not be billed.

I wonder what the HOA insurer would say about this.

From general reading, I do not like the board's chances in court.

In my experience, you are stuck with choosing from only bad options. The least worst option here is to campaign to replace the board with people who feel as you do. The worst option is to lawyer up and start making demands (through your attorney). This will cost you money. You are not guaranteed to get your money back.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Thank you for your reply. We just had our election. We had 6 new nominees plus all current members nominated themselves; and still, somehow, the current Board came up with some proxies and all won re election. We are unsure of the legitimacy since we vote by secret ballot and votes were counted by two of the current Board, who were also nominees, which we did not think was the right way to count the votes. So, getting the votes to recall the current Board would be tough. One of us wants to go to court, and force the Board to do the right thing. We feel the Board should contract for the lawn care of the Common Areas, and if private homeowners want lawn service they should pay the company separately for that service. This would allow for an across the board reduction in dues, also. When that was suggested to the current Board, they balked. I agree that the HOA insuror may have some insight.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Thank you for your reply. We just had our election. We had 6 new nominees plus all current members nominated themselves; and still, somehow, the current Board came up with some proxies and all won re election. We are unsure of the legitimacy since we vote by secret ballot and votes were counted by two of the current Board, who were also nominees, which we did not think was the right way to count the votes. So, getting the votes to recall the current Board would be tough. One of us wants to go to court, and force the Board to do the right thing. We feel the Board should contract for the lawn care of the Common Areas, and if private homeowners want lawn service they should pay the company separately for that service. This would allow for an across the board reduction in dues, also. When that was suggested to the current Board, they balked. I agree that the HOA insuror may have some insight.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Just double-checking here, but how large are your "lots"?

I've seen examples of townhouse communities (HOAs, not condos) where the owner's "lot" extended only 3 feet out from the foundation - in other words, most of the land surrounding the buildings was actually common area and the association's responsibility. Owners could opt in for care of the area immediately adjacent to their home, otherwise they were responsible for this upkeep.

I've seen other communities where the HOA automatically cut the grass in the front yards. Homeowners could opt out, but that wouldn't change their assessments. They could also opt in if they wanted the HOA's lawn care company to cut the grass in the back and on the sides, but there was an extra charge for this.

There's no one way to do this. It depends how your covenants define common area and how your deed defines your own personal property.

The one thing that alarms me is candidates for the board tallying the vote. That's pretty clearly "off" and makes me question other things the board is doing.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BeverlyW4 on 11/03/2023 8:01 PM
Hi. In our townhome community, the HOA has provided lawn service to homeowners private property, as well as the Common Areas "for years." The amount for this "service" is more than half of the monthly dues. Homeowners are not allowed to "opt out" of the service, nor have dues reduced if they decline lawn care. The Covenants specifically state that dues are collected for the repair and maintenance of the Common Areas only, and Lawn Care of individual homes is not mentioned in the Covenants anywhere. When several of us tried to approach the Board, requesting to stop lawn care, we were told we could "opt out," but not pay less in dues. When we stated the Covenants do not permit the Board/HOA to perform work on private property, we were told "it has been done for years and it is a precedent." What is your standing on this issue? Our CC&R does have a clause stating that "failure to enforce any rule of the Covenants does not preclude anyone from doing so in the future."

You could get the grounds maintenance contract to find out how much is being charged for private property maintenance, then pay that amount separately "under protest." A basic property right is the right to exclude others. You could write a letter to your association, ask to have your dues adjusted based on the contract or the local average cost, instruct to opt out of lawn service and give them a time by which to comply. If they don't, ask to meet for dispute resolution and/or take them to small claims court to get a refund and an injunction if you don't get the results you need.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BeverlyW4 on 11/03/2023 8:49 PM
Thank you for your reply. We just had our election. We had 6 new nominees plus all current members nominated themselves; and still, somehow, the current Board came up with some proxies and all won re election. We are unsure of the legitimacy since we vote by secret ballot and votes were counted by two of the current Board, who were also nominees, which we did not think was the right way to count the votes. So, getting the votes to recall the current Board would be tough. One of us wants to go to court, and force the Board to do the right thing. We feel the Board should contract for the lawn care of the Common Areas, and if private homeowners want lawn service they should pay the company separately for that service. This would allow for an across the board reduction in dues, also. When that was suggested to the current Board, they balked. I agree that the HOA insuror may have some insight.

Maybe your laws allow you to inspect the election materials. In California, proxies are not allowed in lieu of a ballot, and a board is not allowed to participate in the election. And an election must be voided if it's found that election procedures were not followed - this can be done in small claims court. I would carefully review your governing documents and state laws to see if there are any remedies you haven't considered.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
The Common Areas are deeded to the HOA and include only 4 parcels. The majority of the land is deeded to the individual owners. The division between Common Areas and private property is very well defined. Yes, we felt there was something sketchy about the vote tally, as well.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
The Common Areas are deeded to the HOA and include only 4 parcels. The majority of the land is deeded to the individual owners. The division between Common Areas and private property is very well defined. Yes, we felt there was something sketchy about the vote tally, as well.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Thank you for your input. The lawn service is paid over $17,000 per year. With the Common Areas being only 4 small areas, one of which is the pool, the majority of the cost is for the privately owned lots. This Board has shown themselves very difficult to work with.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Thank you for your input. The lawn service is paid over $17,000 per year. With the Common Areas being only 4 small areas, one of which is the pool, the majority of the cost is for the privately owned lots. This Board has shown themselves very difficult to work with.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
BeverlyW4, I want to cover as many bases as possible. By any chance does your declaration or Articles of Incorporation say your HOA is organized as a condominium, subject to the Tennessee Condominium Act?

(As you may be aware, Tennessee does not have a HOA statute for subdivisions having stand-alone, single family homes.)

BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Hi. No, we are fee simple, individual ownership, townhome development. Not condominium. I purposefully bought in here to avoid the pitfalls of condominium ownership. I read the CC&R when I bought my home and was comfortable with the dues for Common Area repair and maintenance. However, our Covenants are vague with regard to election/term of office of Board members, simply stating the term of office is "for a two year term." It states nothing re: re election after a Board member has served that two year term. We have had quite a bit on trouble since one particular Board member has been elected. He has served for 6 years, being reelected every time, possibly through nefarious means, using unidentified proxies, etc. The Board, under his leadership, has tried to overstep many times, assessing home owners for maintenance on private owners' walls, etc. I fought him on this and won, but had to go to court to do so, after trying repeatedly to have the Board adhere to the Covenants. The Board attorney at the time even tried to tell them to agree with me, but they would not, and he quit representing the Association. They have since had another quit representing the Association due to this guy's lying about what the attorney advised. As I stated elsewhere in this thread, we tried to launch a group of other owners to get elected to the board, but the vote tally, with unidentified proxies, gave this guy more votes than anyone. Also, with two current Board members, who were also nominees, counting the votes. I am at my wits end.
JoeN6 (Virginia)
Posts: 94
Posted:
Wasn’t the dues amount disclosed to you before you bought the property ?
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
The dues were disclosed when I bought the property. They are raised every year. However, when I bought the property, nowhere did it say that the Board would take the actions that do NOT adhere to the CC&R, that have been taken since I bought in here, nor did it reference "lawn service." So, like most folks, I purchased with the knowledge that there was an HOA, governed by CC&R, and expected them to abide by those, as do I.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
If your association is a corporation, it will be subject to your state's corporations code regarding elections and proxies. Excuse me if that was posted already.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BeverlyW4 on 11/04/2023 8:06 AM
However, our Covenants are vague with regard to election/term of office of Board members, simply stating the term of office is "for a two year term." It states nothing re: re election after a Board member has served that two year term. We have had quite a bit on trouble since one particular Board member has been elected. He has served for 6 years, being reelected every time,
If there are no term limits, then it is perfectly legal for directors to be re-elected time and again.

Nationwide rarely do bylaws specify term limits for nonprofit corporation and HOA/COA directors. I know of no state statutes that do.

Quote:
Posted By BeverlyW4 on 11/04/2023 8:06 AM
possibly through nefarious means, using unidentified proxies, etc. The Board, under his leadership, has tried to overstep many times, assessing home owners for maintenance on private owners' walls, etc. I fought him on this and won, but had to go to court to do so, after trying repeatedly to have the Board adhere to the Covenants. The Board attorney at the time even tried to tell them to agree with me, but they would not, and he quit representing the Association.
This is nice to read. This forum IMO sees too many reports suggesting attorneys care more about their billable hours than they care about the board complying with the law.

Good for you for taking them to court and prevailing. I know it's incredibly labor intensive and costs not a small amount of money. And all to just get the board to do what the covenants and bylaws say it should do.

I checked the Tennessee Nonprofit Corp Act(as you may have as well) and for the record, I see nothing to force the board to take steps promoting fairness and transparency in elections. There is a provision that says the board may retain an inspector. You could lobby for this. Granted it sounds like this will fall on deaf ears.

You may simply not have the numbers. It's pretty common for apathy translating to people being satisfied with the status quo, IMO.

You may be stuck creating a larger campaign to get new directors, soliciting in particular the people who assigned proxies to the directors at this last election.

ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 11/04/2023 5:18 AM

You could get the grounds maintenance contract to find out how much is being charged for private property maintenance, then pay that amount separately "under protest."
Okay.

Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 11/04/2023 5:18 AM
A basic property right is the right to exclude others.
I do not know what this means. Nor have I heard of such a "basic property right." If you have a citation for your point, consider posting it. I can say this: If the CC&Rs require the assessment be based on the cost of caring for the common areas, and the board is basing the assessment on the cost of caring for the common areas and privately owned lots, then an owner has a viable claim in court to enforce the covenants as written.

Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 11/04/2023 5:18 AM
You could write a letter to your association, ask to have your dues adjusted based on the contract or the local average cost, instruct to opt out of lawn service and give them a time by which to comply. If they don't, ask to meet for dispute resolution and/or take them to small claims court to get a refund and an injunction if you don't get the results you need.
I would ask to have the dues adjusted base on the covenants, period.

Otherwise, I do not rule out trying what TerriS6 describes in small claims court. I would want to study up on whether Tennessee small claims court has jurisdiction here. It's possible enforcing covenants is outside Tn small claims courts' purview.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 11/04/2023 8:48 AM
Posted By TerriS6 on 11/04/2023 5:18 AM

You could get the grounds maintenance contract to find out how much is being charged for private property maintenance, then pay that amount separately "under protest."
Okay.

Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 11/04/2023 5:18 AM
A basic property right is the right to exclude others.
I do not know what this means. Nor have I heard of such a "basic property right."
My bad. TerriS6 is referring to an owner's right to exclude others from access to the owner's property. And yes, it is considered pretty basic.

But while this board has already said it will stop performing lawn services at an owner's request, the board has not agreed to lower the owner's assessment.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Appreciate your input. Our HOA is a non profit LLC. Again, our Covenants specify a "two year term limit." But, goes no further except to say that the current Board member would complete the two year term until his successor is in place. It says nothing about re election or succeeding one's self. We tried to have a governance committee work on revisions to our governing documents, but the troublesome Board member stopped them working on it when the attorney quit over learning the guy was misrepresenting his advice. There are so many things they do incorrectly and fail to do...providing owners with itemized statements of their accounts, providing owners with end of year statements (P&L, Balance Sheets, etc.). Their way is to sit at the Annual meeting and have the Treasurer read the expense totals in each category for the year. No statements from those who have been paid, no bank statements, etc. This year they had worked up three proposed budgets, with very inflated costs for each category, in an attempt to raise the dues above the permitted annual increase. Even their lowest budget, which had several fake line items was voted down. We have learned the President lied about the true costs of the "lawn service," which prompted the entire question I originally posted about in this forum. Yes, apathy, and fear of "upsetting my neighbors if I speak out" on the part of many homeowners, has led to this.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Yes, I agree on forcing them to adhere to the CC&R. And, yes, I was able to successfully sue them in our General Sessions court over their assessing owners for painting walls on private property, not Common Areas. Another owner is now considering going to court on this new issue. She has tried to reason with the Board, as did I. However, the President claims "precedent," and refuses to listen to the valid arguement regarding adherence to the Covenants.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BeverlyW4 on 11/04/2023 8:59 AM
Appreciate your input. Our HOA is a non profit LLC. Again, our Covenants specify a "two year term limit." But, goes no further except to say that the current Board member would complete the two year term until his successor is in place. It says nothing about re election or succeeding one's self.
The law says: re-election is not prohibited. Hence it is allowed. One person can serve multiple, successive terms.

Quote:
Posted By BeverlyW4 on 11/04/2023 8:59 AM
This year they had worked up three proposed budgets, with very inflated costs for each category, in an attempt to raise the dues above the permitted annual increase. Even their lowest budget, which had several fake line items was voted down. We have learned the President lied about the true costs of the "lawn service," which prompted the entire question I originally posted about in this forum. Yes, apathy, and fear of "upsetting my neighbors if I speak out" on the part of many homeowners, has led to this.
Many folks are coming here complaining about the increase in their assessments. Many directors are coming here reporting that their insurance went up by a factor of 2 or even three, and other costs have gone up enormously.

I caution owners coming here complaining about increases in this economy. Boards hands are often tied. Owners complaining need to be quite studious.

Beverly, if your bylaws allow the owners to reject a budget, and so the board is stuck with reverting to the previous year's budget, be ready for the quality of services to decline quickly. Because a landscaping company, for one, may very well refuse to do everything it did in previous years for the coming year, without an increase in payment.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BeverlyW4 on 11/04/2023 9:03 AM
Yes, I agree on forcing them to adhere to the CC&R. And, yes, I was able to successfully sue them in our General Sessions court over their assessing owners for painting walls on private property, not Common Areas. Another owner is now considering going to court on this new issue. She has tried to reason with the Board, as did I. However, the President claims "precedent," and refuses to listen to the valid arguement regarding adherence to the Covenants.
Just to be complete: I have seen case law on bylaws being de facto amended by acquiescence of a corporation's membership and directors, with no vote of owners or directors ever taking place. Instead, the corporation operated in such and such a way, in violation of the written-down bylaws, for years, and no one complained. Courts have said that the such-and-such a way became a de facto amendment to the bylaws, because all "acquiesced" to the such-and-such a way, saying nothing in protest.

But I do not think this same principle holds in the situation you describe. I understand covenants are a very different animal from (mere) bylaws. I think the courts do not like to amend covenants in the way you describe. ('Abandonment of covenants' is a very different issue, IMO. To me, this is not an abandonment issue. Instead, the board added something to the covenants, without an owners' vote.)

I am speaking off the top of my head, based on a lot of reading over the last 13 years and observing in person a number of HOA court cases interpreting and enforcing covenants. I am not an attorney.
JoeN6 (Virginia)
Posts: 94
Posted:
Bev …. How long have you been paying for the private lawn care not enumerated in the cc&rs? The defendant may bring up the en latches doctrine
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BeverlyW4 on 11/04/2023 9:03 AM
Yes, I agree on forcing them to adhere to the CC&R. And, yes, I was able to successfully sue them in our General Sessions court over their assessing owners for painting walls on private property, not Common Areas. Another owner is now considering going to court on this new issue. She has tried to reason with the Board, as did I. However, the President claims "precedent," and refuses to listen to the valid arguement regarding adherence to the Covenants.

Report to police for vandalism.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Hi. I am NOT complaining about increase in dues (caps for emphasis, not yelling at you). I am complaining about a "service" being forced onto owners whereby the Board overreaches and tends to private property, rather than confining themselves to the Common Areas, and forcing owners to pay for it with over half their dues. We did agree to an increase in dues, though did not approve their budget, as it contained false line items, and inflated costs for pool, etc. (which even the Treasurer agreed that the pool budget did not reflect the true cost of the pool for the last two years and the pool budget was doubled).
Again, the only service the Board is to provide is maintenance of the pool, and the three lots which are Common Areas (mowing/trimming these).
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Also, if the Board would confine themselves to the Common Areas, our dues would decrease by more than half.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Joe, it has been for years. However, our CC&R does have the statement that not enforcing any part of the Covenant does not preclued anyone from doing so in the future. And, they have been asked about this many times in the past, though they continue to stick to their guns. Personally, I think whoever started it used it as a way to get their own lawn tended while getting others to pay for it, even though, under the CC&R, it was not legal.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Sorry, that should read...does not preclude...
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Now, that's an interesting take on it.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Your membership would have a class action against your association for forcing all of you to pay for your neighbor’s private property maintenance.

Your board is not authorized to invoice you for your neighbor’s private property maintenance. I would take them to small claims court to get a refund for all the years you lived there. The court will say you got some benefit from it so they will get a discount but bring every single piece of correspondence you have stating you don’t want the maintenance. Then show your governing docs where they only have authority to maintain the common areas.

Ask for an injunction to order them to stop.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Another good insight. Thank you.
JoeN6 (Virginia)
Posts: 94
Posted:
My understanding of the situation is Bev is not paying for her neighbours private property mowing . Bev is paying for her properties mowing , and each and every neighbour is paying for theirs , the cost of which is folded in to the monthly dues . Bev prefers to cut her own Lawn because her cardiologist recommended getting her steps in . Bev might as well walk behind a self propelled movwer and save on her dues. I’m assuming all the properties own the same Square footage in lawn . Of course , that’s not the case, there are a few end units with more grass ( perhaps Board members all own end units)
JoeN6 (Virginia)
Posts: 94
Posted:
Let the board sit on their ass and listen to their arteries harden
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JoeN6 on 11/04/2023 3:41 PM
My understanding of the situation is Bev is not paying for her neighbours private property mowing . Bev is paying for her properties mowing , and each and every neighbour is paying for theirs , the cost of which is folded in to the monthly dues . Bev prefers to cut her own Lawn because her cardiologist recommended getting her steps in . Bev might as well walk behind a self propelled movwer and save on her dues. I’m assuming all the properties own the same Square footage in lawn . Of course , that’s not the case, there are a few end units with more grass ( perhaps Board members all own end units)

All the members are paying for all the lawns to be maintained as if they were common areas and all the members had a right to use each others’ lawns.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
I came home one day and two men were spraying a coating on my driveway. We didn’t know who they were, they came without being called and without a contract. I made them stop and they tried to force us to pay $3,800. There is no way they would succeed in collecting for a service we didn’t ask for and didn’t want.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 11/04/2023 2:51 PM
Your membership would have a class action against your association for forcing all of you to pay for your neighbor’s private property maintenance.
The way I see it the owners had the chance to vote in new boards and/or sue to stop the violation of the covenants. Owners did not sue. Nor did they vote in directors who would stop this practice. I would not say anyone was "forced."

When shareholder members sue on behalf of the corporation in which they hold shares, naming directors as defendants, it is called a derivative suit. "Class action" is not applicable. It's called a derivative suit because the right to sue derives from the right of the corporation not to be harmed.

I would not be hopeful about recovering past sums, due to laches. But going forward, I can see a court issuing an injunction to stop this behavior that violates the covenants.

It is going to cost the OP. I would be looking at whether the covenants say that the HOA has to pay my attorney fees if I win.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Lol. No, all the lots are not the same size. Some are twice the size of mine. Also, it takes the guy 3 min for my rear yard and the same for the front (I've timed him). He mowes twice a month. I should be paying him $12. And, no all Board members don't own end units. But, again, the issue is the Board paying for someone to maintain private property when the Covenants state that dues are for the repair and maintenance of the Common Areas only.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Pretty sure one of the owners is about to file suit. And, we are highly suspect of the voting at Annual meeting as votes were counted by two current Board members, who were also nominees, and a large number of proxies were produced, which were not identified as to who the owners signing the proxies were. So, this is possibly why the guy who few claim to like or trust, comes up with the most votes, and no one was able to prove otherwise. As you know, owners are intimidated into inaction by not wanting to make waves with their neighbors, and just take whatever is done to them. I was frankly surprised that the inflated budget requested was voted down, but that did not involve proxies...only the Board election involved proxies, which is also suspect.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Someone probably has asked about this; I may have read this thread too quickly.

My understanding from another TN poster elsewhere s that there isn't HOA legislation. So you must rely on your own Bylaws about elections. You also must rely on TN corporations codes assuming you're incorporated. Those codes should tell how such corporations may elect directors and officers. They may or may not say something like "unless your Bylaws say otherwise."

Board members counting ballots when they are candidates for reelection is outrageous and everyone should be angry. That's against the law is some states.

Many times ignorant board members yell "precedent" when the Assoc. behaves outside what's permitted in their governing docs. "we've always done it this say." But your CC&Rs and mine too say that just because a covenant has been violated for a long Tim dies not mean an owner can't take action or a Board.I think you' said that others have complained about this expenditure over the years so this violation has not been ignored. If these complaints hav been n writing, there should be no statute of limitations issue or the "doctrine of laches." issue.

I hope that you and other neighbors who agree with you should do everything you can to support the neighbor who's using this through legal action. The more support from the rest of you, the more the board will perhaps decide to rethink this
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 11/04/2023 6:43 PM
I think you' said that others have complained about this expenditure over the years so this violation has not been ignored. If these complaints hav been n writing, there should be no statute of limitations issue or the "doctrine of laches."
To stop a defense (by the HOA) of laches, I believe the owners would have had to file suit. Mere complaints in writing some years ago, or even year after year, are not enough. So I believe.

I do not see the owners getting money back from the HOA. Fact: The HOA's money is the owners' money. If owners want remuneration, what is the board going to do? Special assess the very owners who are owed money by the HOA?

Furthermore the owners did get a benefit from the HOA (lawn care).

I think the proper course is to stop this violation of the covenants going forward, via a threat of a lawsuit or an actual lawsuit.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Thank you, for your thoughtful reply. I, too, think that the proper course would be for the Board to stop all lawn care on private property, continue to maintain the Common Areas, and then each homeowner who wishes to have lawn care contract with the provider individually. However, getting the Board to agree will most likely require court action. This Board does not treat the HOA money as the owner's money, rather it seems their own personal "piggy bank." For example, while the Common Area walls were in need of repair and paint, they chose to spend $4000 to convert our pool from chlorine to saltwater, without informing the owners. Then, when the City cited them for the state of the Common Area walls, they came up with a scheme to get money from owners offering to paint/repair any walls any owner requested, if said owner would pay them separately. Then, and only then, did they repair the Common Area walls. Some of the work paid separately by those owners who asked for the work to be done has still not been done. Not only that, but the Board instructed the company who did the pool conversion to not speak with anyone other than Board members, so no owner could get information as to the real cost of the conversion. When this was brought up at the Annual meeting, they said the conversion had to be done because the sand in the pool pump was going to need to be replaced. I'm sure that would have been less than $4,000, and they would have then had the money for the Common Area wall work. Of course, over the long haul, saltwater pools may be less expensive to maintain. However, that could have been done AFTER the long neglected Common Area work was taken care of. I'm telling you, this Board is a cluster. And, we cannot prove the shenanigans with the vote, even though any thinking person feels it is totally unacceptable for a Board member or nominee to be anywhere near the ballots and counting.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
There are also quite a few elderly folks living here and they just seem to be so easily manipulated and used...I would move, but I love my home and have done so much work on it. Not to mention I have a low interest rate and wouldn't be able to afford anything near as nice as my current home. So, I must stay and join with my neighbors who want to try to fight and make our neighborhood better.
MarkS42 (North Carolina)
Posts: 70
Posted:
I don't know how many units you have in your HOA. If there were 6 candidates i am guessing you have at least 200 townhomes. You stated that lawncare is $17000 annually. Lets say every one does their own lawn. The hoa would probably have to pay at least 6000 for the common area. 11000 / 200 homes / 10 months / 2 mowings a month. That works to $2.75 to have the HOA mow your lawn. It sounds like you are shooting yourself in the foot.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BeverlyW4 on 11/04/2023 7:28 PM
There are also quite a few elderly folks living here and they just seem to be so easily manipulated and used...
What this says to me is that throwing out the incumbents will be difficult. Instead, those who feel as you do are stuck threatening and possibly bringing suit to enforce the covenants.

I continue to not like the liability concerns here. E.g. if someone trips on a front lawn due to some failure of the landscaping crew to do xyz, would the HOA insurer cover it, especially in these days when insurers are struggling (relative to prior years, anyway) and raising rates by unheard of percentages? If I were the insurer, I would say: "The insurance policy has a clause about not paying for claims that have a basis in willful misconduct by the board. The board is blatantly violating the covenants. Here's a bunch of owners' emails and letters that even point this out. The company rejects the insurance claim. Don't like it? Sue us (the insurance company)."
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Our Declaration states under what circumstances the association has authority to enter onto a separate interest; it is only in connection with construction or maintenance of the common area. It would be interesting to see what your docs say about it.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
No. We have 40 units.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Thank you. I plan to contact the insuror this week.
BeverlyW4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Our docs say the same, except in the event of property neglect by an owner. The Board is then to send notice of the needed repairs, give a time frame for the repairs to be completed, and, should the owner fail to comply, the Board may have the work done and then assess that individual owner for said repairs. This Board has repeatedly violated the Covenants.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Every time they mowed your lawn after you advised them not to is a trespass.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here