CharlesW1 (Georgia)
Posts: 826
Posts: 826
Posted:
As many of you may recall our BOD (Georgia) have been diligently working to opt from HOA to a POA with very little success, until just recently when the board decided to act on the advice provided to the board from a renowned POA attorney.
After his interpretation of our governing documents was provided, was when I questioned his âlegal adviceâ in regards to the rights as a HO.
I addressed my concerns to the PM as well as the other two board members on several occasions, with little regard to my interpretation of the governing documents. Basically my views/opinion, âdidnât hold much waterâ when compared to the legal advice being obtained by the PM and a POA attorney.
Too make a long story short. The POA attorney basically said that âthe board can use their authority (as board members) to allow those (in good standings to vote on the POA)â, therefore approving the POA, based upon the votes that were received and those HO in good standings, as of the deadline. The board dismissing the other purposed amendments, but hopefully will be executed with future boards. We(board, PM and POA attorney) all agreed that the POA will benefit the association considerably, even though 2/3âs of the ENTIRE ASSOCIATION didnât vote, YES or NO. By not voting SOME would say that âtheyâ had spoken, although that is were I strongly disagree.
This decision STILL weighs in heavily in my mind as I believed ALL (as stated in our covenants means ALL lot owners, regardless of those in good standings, when amending the covenants. I came to the conclusion that we werenât approving anything that wouldnât potentially increase property values and benefit the majority of Lot owners. Therefore, I decided to exercise this right also.
Our governing documents can and should still be amended (as purposed). They would be vital in the future growth and development of this community, âIFâ pursued and approved based upon the votes collected. As a HO first and foremost, I truly believe that the purposed amendments would benefit those who own property within our association.
This has certainly been a learning experience. Iâm overjoyed to know that the community and I will prosper even âIFâ future boards DONâT perform their fiduciary duty as board members. This has made my purpose (IMO) as a board member (past two years) worth all the endless hours and countless late nights discussing our options to opt-into a POA or to simply âwash our handsâ of the entire process? Which wasnât so much a choice as it was becoming more of a certainty.
I thank you all for your advice and suggestions. I continue to learn so very much from all of you.
Thank you once again
Chuck W
Charles E. Wafer Jr.