More secret meetings and confusion

Was this on the agenda for an upcoming board meeting?

If so I am not convinced a violation exists, on account of the contract formation rule.

Sounds like contract formation to me. Contract formation may be done in executive session. See https://www.davis-stirling.com/HOME/E/Executive-Session-Meetings

I do not see the evidence that there was no executive session. Plus the board might have shared information by email (which is now lawful per the August appeals court decision).

Look at the top of the page again, remember last time, and in the yellow banner you will see "to share ideas and learn"

I have learned quite a bit from Terri and her experience dealing with a rogue board, secret meetings, action without meeting, small claims court experience, etc. I appreciate her posting things like this because our board does a lot of the same thing.

What I have learned from you Lydia (Aidyl), is that your a troll...

I've asked Aidyl's question twice now. The first time, Terri said all she wants is for the board to run the association according to its documents. That makes sense, but it hasn't happened, even after the last lawsuit. We know what Einstein said about the insanity of doing the same thing and expcting different results.

Ultimately, the homeowners are the ones who will have to say enough and vote out this board or at least insist on a therapist to have a few meetings with the board and Terri to hash out their differences once and for all. Right now, the board's failure not to have open meetings in 4 months is a bigger problem. It could be because of this assessment thing or something else, but since Terri is aware of what they're talking about, it does look to be a big secret.

I'd love to know just what the homeowners feel about all this and for some reason, a majority don't seem to feel as Terri, otherwise, I would think talk of a recall would have come up by now, but it hasn't. I'd also think those who support what she's doing would come to board meetings or talk up these people zbd say so. Doesn't sound like that's happened either.

At this point, I fear everyone's indifferent - the board says "it doesn't matter what we do, Terri will sue us" and other homeowners don't care, or are afraid to say anything, or have no problem with what the board is doing and think Terri just wants attention or really wants a seat on the board. The question is which opinion has the majority of homeowners because unless and until you motivate enough people to join the cause, we'll keep seeing these conversations.

Then again, speaking truth to power is never easy, but that doesn't mean you can't change up your tactics. That's required if you want to see lasting change. In fact James, I recall you had a number of conversations about your board, you and some of your neighbors got together and ran for seats and I recall you said you and a few others won, but then things fell apart because of how tbe fits was counted or something- has that resolved itself?

This is not related to small claims.

My point is: people believed him.
Why don't members vote out our board? Old friends. The believe the pitch. They believe the spin. They have money to risk.