Quote:
Posted By LoriM15 on 09/29/2023 1:05 PM
We do have the authority to turn down a tenant. Here's what our documents say:
10.4 Approval Process; Disapproval. Any Owner intending to lease his Parcel shall submit a copy of the proposed lease, an application, and any other requested information and required fees at least thirty (30) days in advance of the commencement of the lease or renewal or extension term. Upon receipt of all information and fees required by Master Association and an interview (if requested by the Board), the Master Association shall have the duty to approve or disapprove all proposed leases within thirty (30) days of receipt of such information for approval and the completion of the Tenant/Resident interview (if required), by sending written notification to the Owner within such time frame. All requests for approval not acted upon within thirty (30) days shall be deemed approved. Applications for renewals or extensions of lease agreements shall be submitted at least thirty (30) days in advance of the expiration of the lease agreement. If the Master Association disapproves a proposed lease or renewal or extension, the Owner shall receive a short statement indicating the reason for the disapproval, and the lease shall not be made, renewed, or extended. The Master Association shall neither have a duty to provide an alternate Tenant nor shall it assume any responsibility for the denial of a lease application if any denial is based upon any of the following factors:
10.4.1 The Person seeking approval (which shall hereinafter include all proposed Occupants or Residents) has been convicted of, pled no contest to, or has been released from incarceration, probation or community control for:
(a) a capital, first or second degree felony involving violence to Persons within the past ten (10) years; or
(b) a first or second degree felony involving illegal drugs within the past ten (10) years; or
(c) any drug offence involving the manufacture and/or distribution of illegal drugs regardless of when that conviction, plea or release occurred; or
(d) a felony involving sexual battery, sexual abuse, or lewd and lascivious behavior regardless of when that conviction, plea or release occurred;
10.4.2 The Person seeking approval has been labeled a sexual offender or a sexual predator by any governmental or quasi-governmental agency regardless of when that label occurred;
10.4.3 The Person seeking approval is currently on probation or community control for a felony involving violence to another or damage to or theft of property;
CathyA3 spoke of problems with prohibiting felons. To elaborate based on what I know:
I believe HUD would consider much of the above covenant/rule to be violations of the Fair Housing Act.
The federal government via HUD has spoken to how restrictions on felons disproportionately impacts certain demographics, and in HUD's view, this amounts to discrimination on the basis of race. The net has plenty of discussion on this.
Regarding sex offenders, here is a 2023 court ruling saying HOAs cannot keep them out (in Pennsylvania, at least): https://www.communityassociationinsider.com/court-rules-hoas-cant-ban-sex-offenders-could-other-states-follow/
I would vote to get an attorney's advice on the above covenants/rules.