💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

ChrisS28 (Tennessee)
Posts: 3
Posted:
We have our elections coming up for board officers and our state of Florida statues as well as our neighborhoods Bylaws do not cover anything regarding elections of officers. Therefore, we created an "Election Policy" that the entire board agreed to an put in place at a prior official meeting, but this situation is not covered in that policy document either.

My question is, our VP has submitted paperwork to challenge for the role of President and the concern is the possibility of our VP holding two director positions. To negate this issue, would it be reasonable to require our VP to vacate her current position prior to holding elections in order to officially challenge for a new officer position?
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
ChrisS28, nationwide nearly all bylaws state that the owners elect directors, and then the directors select the officers.

In the HOA worls, it's a common mistake to think the word "officers" is interchangeable with the word "directors." They are two different roles.

Please explain what you know about these subjects. If possible, quote exactly what your bylaws say on the subject of electing directors and selecting officers.

Is this a Condominium, subject to FS 718? Or a non-condominium, subject to FS 720? Or is it an RV park? Or a co-op?
ChrisS28 (Tennessee)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Our board has 5 directors only, this is a neighborhood under FS 720 and I am a current serving director. Our bylaws do not address elections other than they are to be held every two years and require a quorum.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChrisS28 on 09/02/2023 8:11 AM
Our board has 5 directors only, this is a neighborhood under FS 720 and I am a current serving director. Our bylaws do not address elections other than they are to be held every two years and require a quorum.
Your HOA is most likely also a nonprofit corporation, subject to FS 617. From FS 617:

617.0840 Required officers.—
(1) A corporation shall have the officers described in its articles of incorporation or its bylaws who shall be elected or appointed at such time and for such terms as is provided in the articles of incorporation or the bylaws. In the absence of any such provisions, all officers shall be elected or appointed by the board of directors annually.
(2) A duly appointed officer may appoint one or more officers or assistant officers if authorized by the bylaws or the board of directors.
(3) The bylaws or the board of directors shall delegate to one of the officers responsibility for preparing minutes of the directors’ and members’ meetings and for authenticating records of the corporation.
(4) The same individual may simultaneously hold more than one office in a corporation.


Your Board should memorize this or tattoo it on all directors' foreheads. Also share this with all owners.

Start keyword searching FS 617 regularly, along with FS 720.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0600-0699/0617/0617.html

If you do not understand how the above answers your questions, please ask clarifying questions.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
In California corporations, one person can be 2 officers but in or HOA by-laws, they can't.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
It is a misnomer that a VP succeeds the President position if it was to become vacant. This is a corporation NOT a government structure. The VP is it's own position. So if the President did open that position the other board members/officers would have to vote amongst themselves who fills the position. One doesn't run for the position when campaigning to be elected to the board. Once elected then the board votes on position.

Former HOA President
ChrisS28 (Tennessee)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Considering this is not for vacant positions but rather open elections after a two year term, candidates running for the board state which position they are running for as all positions are currently filled.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChrisS28 on 09/02/2023 9:15 AM
Considering this is not for vacant positions but rather open elections after a two year term, candidates running for the board state which position they are running for as all positions are currently filled.

Typically one does not run for a specific Officer's position. They run to get on the BOD and the BOD elects it's own Officers.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChrisS28 on 09/02/2023 9:15 AM
Considering this is not for vacant positions but rather open elections after a two year term, candidates running for the board state which position they are running for as all positions are currently filled.
Yeah, you and your fellow directors do not understand (1) the difference between officers and directors; and (2) FS 617.

You all should hire an attorney to explain this to you.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
It may be possible to hold two officer positions depending on what your bylaws and state laws say.

For example, communities may have a VP/Secretary or a Secretary/Treasurer. The only combination that may cause problems would be President/Treasurer - because then a single person could sign contracts *and* checks, which makes embezzlement much easier. And President/VP makes no sense since one of a VP's functions is to act when the President can't or won't.

As others have stated, owners elect directors. After the election, the new board meets and appoints the new officers. Someone who runs for the board may want to be President, but that's no guarantee that they'll be appointed to that position after the election.

(In my experience, many people don't want to be President, and I'd be looking closely at someone who wants the job. Why do they want it? Do they mistakenly believe that the President has the authority to tell other board members what to do? Do they mistakenly believe that their vote counts more than the other directors' votes? Somebody who wants the job for the wrong reasons can cause more harm than good.)
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Ellen & JohnC re exactly right, Chris. No way should officer positions be on the ballot for owners to elect directors. That is completely wrong. See Elle's citation above in BOLD: "... all officers shall be elected or appointed by the board of directors annually." ONLY the directors on a board elect officers.

This generally is done at an open meeting of the board immediately following the announcing of the election results at the meeting of the members (owners). Some states call this board meeting an "organizational meeting." Sticking with Elle's citation, officers serve only for one year--until this board meeting to elect officers. Therefore, at this meeting, this woman no longer is VP. I suppose it's OK if she gives her resume or whatever to the rest of the Board at that meeting to try to get them to vote for her, but I've never heard of that behavior.

At this organizational meetings, directors nominate self or another for an officer position. The nomination must be seconded. Directors vote on each officer position.

Based on what you wrote above Chris, the policy your board invented is mostly useless and parts of it violate FL 617.0840.

I see the citation above states that something about officers and elections might be in your Articles of Incorporation. did you read them?

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CathyA3 on 09/02/2023 10:02 AM
It may be possible to hold two officer positions depending on what your bylaws and state laws say.

For example, communities may have a VP/Secretary or a Secretary/Treasurer. The only combination that may cause problems would be President/Treasurer - because then a single person could sign contracts *and* checks, which makes embezzlement much easier. And President/VP makes no sense since one of a VP's functions is to act when the President can't or won't.

As others have stated, owners elect directors. After the election, the new board meets and appoints the new officers. Someone who runs for the board may want to be President, but that's no guarantee that they'll be appointed to that position after the election.

(In my experience, many people don't want to be President, and I'd be looking closely at someone who wants the job. Why do they want it? Do they mistakenly believe that the President has the authority to tell other board members what to do? Do they mistakenly believe that their vote counts more than the other directors' votes? Somebody who wants the job for the wrong reasons can cause more harm than good.)

At one time I was both VP and Treasurer. If I recall, it is improper for the Pres. and Sec. to be the same person.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
With the post count at zero, it appears that the OP has left the forum.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 09/02/2023 12:46 PM
.... snip ...
If I recall, it is improper for the Pres. and Sec. to be the same person.

Do you remember what the explanation for that is? In my current condo association, the Secretary was the VP (whose duties included acting when the President wouldn't or couldn't) so it wouldn't have made sense if they were the same person. Could be community-specific, I guess...

A VP/Treasurer could have the same issue as a President/Treasurer: a single person able to sign both contracts and checks. If there are other controls in place, such as the Treasurer can't actually cut a check, then maybe it's OK. But in self-managed HOAs, I would think that an auditor would cite this as an issue.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Though the OP has left the house, this topic--the distinction between offices & directors is-- from what I've seen here, the MOST misunderstood among posters no matter their role or length of time in their association.

FL617.0484 is, I'm guessing, very similar to requirements in most other states. There'll be differences in the details. In CA Corps Codes for instance, there must be a president, sec'y & treasurer.

Further differences can be found in the Bylaws. To Cathy & JohnC's points, bylaws might specify what offices can be held simultaneously. In my HOA, the president may not simultaneously be the treasurer or secretary. Cathy & John both may want to check their own Bylaws or perhaps Articles. It could be there's been a Board "practice" for many years with no written requirements.

My understanding about the reasoning in my HOA is that signatures of both officers are required to withdraw more than $300 from reserves. In my HOA both the secretary and the president sign meeting minutes.

Additional info is that many, perhaps most Bylaws permit boards to appoint non- directors as officers. For a several-month period, such a person was appointed treasurer in my HOA as no director wanted that task. As such, these officers have NO vote at board meetings because only directors vote at board meetings.

Some bylaws also permit Boards to appoint an officer of their own designation, say, "assistant secretary." Again, that person would have no board vote.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here