Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 08/27/2023 7:38 AM
Posted By WilliamW14 on 08/26/2023 7:21 PM
I feel that she knew there was no provide phone when she took the position.
This is not accurate. You should know better.
A HOA Director or officer can be compensated for expenses incurred in the performance of his or her duties. Many HOA presidents carry the lion's share of the workload. For example, BillD16 is the swimming pool monitor for his HOA, in very hot, and so swimming pool intensive, Texas. I can completely understand how someone like BillD16 would want a separate phone. He will have a different phone number from his private phone number. It allows him to compartmentalize his work. He can hold onto texts without mixing the texts in with his private life (which includes a wife and one or more children). And so on.
I think a request for a HOA-provided phone may be entirely reasonable.
Your not knowing that a director or officer's reasonable requests for reimbursement for HOA-related expenses is a problem, IMO.
As usual, I'm sorry I'm late to this conversation. ElleN is absolutely correct: I've been extremely busy. I owe y'all a post about it sometime soon - trespassing incidents have gone through the roof; last week we had 7 incidents in 6 days. But I confess I'm extremely happy to know that I'm not forgotten here.
I personally would not want a separate cellphone. And at first take, I can see how an HOA Board member wanting the HOA to pay for a phone for them to use for exclusive HOA business makes it sound like they have a very high opinion of themselves.
But - MarkM mentioned the Hillary Clinton thing (which essentially hinged on mixing personal biz with politics biz)(I think), and when I was working in the computer biz I had some involvement with "Bring Your Own Device" (BYOD) efforts where many millions of dollars were spent to build encrypted and highly secure special-purpose virtual environments on phones and tablets, such that a person could keep all of their confidential{1} work stuff inside of these 'containers'. And if your boss thought you were selling them out, the container could be directed to auto-erase. Or - it was sometimes rumored - even brick the device{2}.
I'm kind of going off the rails, sorry, but a very basic (but often overlooked) difference between a desktop computer and a 'personal device' is that the 'personal device' *really is* personal - most device operating systems are designed and built with absolutely *no* support for anything like "multiple users".
My point is: yes, I can definitely see someone wanting to separate their Personal Phone from their HOA Phone. The first thing I did when I was elected to the Board was create a separate HOA email account, and wow was *that* ever worth it. Having separate phone devices is pretty much the same. Although I would hate having to switch between 2 or more phones. I really don't remember much about the Hillary thing, but I can relate to the frustration that would come with "drat, I need to make a really important call but I can't use this phone and I left the phone I need at the other office and it'll take me an hour." It sure seems like it would be easy - even probable - that someone would 'slip'. Not trivializing it - just saying it seems like a stupid way to do things.
As for paying for it - policies would vary from company to company, but often there was some kind of monthly allowance when people could argue a genuine need for a separate business phone or service. Receipts were required and there was monthly paperwork; it wasn't any kind of casual "hey, here's a free phone!" sort of deal.
If it were me, for an HOA? I think I'd develop a policy for all Board members, such that if they had sufficient and *specific* justification, I'd offer them some lame amount like $200 towards the phone purchase and then another lame amount like $50/month for service. Oh - I don't think a 'flip phone' would work for this; years ago one of my kids wasn't doing well in school because he and his girlfriend were texting each other thousands{3} of times each month. And you can't just take away a kid's phone these days - that's tantamount to child abuse. What if they get into an accident?! Also: you can't just disable text messaging. I mean: it is not possible.
But what I *could* do is take his iPhone away and give him a Motorola RAZR *evil grin*. He could still do text messages. But it was significantly less fun.
Bill
{1} lemme tellya, tech companies big and small take "confidential" ***very*** seriously. Sharing a 'business device' with a wife, or even letting your kid play games on it - don't even think about it.
{2} my involvement was, umm - this was some years ago but I believe it's still true - if you're a big company, you can pay Apple a lot of money and get a special thing called an Enterprise Distribution Certificate, which essentially allows you to set up your own private App Store from which employees can download internal use only iOS apps onto their iOS devices. This EDC was *very* sensitive information - for instance, if it leaked, some rogue developer might make a pr0n app that seemed to be an official product of a big tech company that had no sense of humor about such things. This made developing those special internal use only iOS apps something of a challenge and one of the projects I worked on long ago involved figuring out how to let developers develop without also letting them see the EDC. Are you still awake?
{3} not an exaggeration.
HOA Board ex-President
Austin, Texas USA
“You can’t put too much water in a nuclear reactor”