💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

NattyM (Florida)
Posts: 21
Posted:

A few unit owners requested to see the condos bank statements and the board responded to us saying this:
“Please be advised that as these are financial records that include account and routing numbers for association accounts therefore the association attorney will be present ensuring this information is redacted from the documents before they are scanned. The scanning of a document and uploading via internet without such redaction could pose a security issue and therefore must be done in an appropriate manner.”

My questions are:
1) why does the attorney need to be there?
2) do we need to redacted the account and routing numbers before making copies. ( we’re requesting 3years of all the bank statements)
LoriM15 (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
I would argue that under FS 718 you are not entitled to copies of bank statements. Financial records like monthly accounts are official records but not bank statements. Your association is trying to be transparent by allowing you access to those if that’s not required. However, they are right not to include routeing and account numbers. Including those could lead to fraud. The attorney is overseeing the process so you can get the records you need without the sensitive information. Why do you have a problem with this?
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
In California we can ask for and receive bank statements.
LizD3 (California)
Posts: 200
Posted:
It is overkill to have the attorney there (pay $400/hour to black line a few numbers?!). Furthermore, if you direct deposit or wire your assessment to the condo bank, the Association would have had to give you the routing and account numbers. So that’s not confidential information. (In fact, you can call the Association's bank and they'll tell you the routing number. And if you pay by check, look at the back of your cancelled check; the account number, and maybe also the routing number, may very well have been stamped there, making the attorney especially pointless).

Terri, do you know if we can ask for and receive copies of cancelled checks, as well as bank statements? Been asking; have not been receiving.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Liz, yes to getting canceled checks 5200(b)
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Natty

Sounds like a witch hunt. What specifically are you looking for?
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 07/21/2023 7:14 AM
Natty

Sounds like a witch hunt. What specifically are you looking for?

That's a good point. Since the bank statements list all deposits and withdrawals, having that information by itself won't tell you much unless you're looking at the association's income/expense statements, along with board meeting minutes, and perhaps invoices and contracts from vendors. Maybe the reserve study, your documents, etc. and so on.

Here's a link to an article on HOA bank statements - https://clarksimsonmiller.com/hoa-bank-statements-everything-you-should-know/ This website also had links to other blog articles that may be helpful to you. Bottom line, you will be reading a lot of stuff if you're going to take a deep dive into the association finances, so it's important not to jump to conclusions by just looking at one thing.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
If the bank statements alone "won't tell you much," there shouldn't be an objection to getting copies of them.
The article cited makes it seem only board members should be able to detect fraud.
When it comes to $$, members should be able to see/know everything.
For example, if it's thought a board might be conducting an unlawful collection, it would be useful to see the bank statements.
LizD3 (California)
Posts: 200
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 07/21/2023 6:24 AM
Liz, yes to getting canceled checks 5200(b)

Is there anything you don't know?! Thanks.
JamesB37 (California)
Posts: 351
Posted:
From the D-S Site, those fall under 'Enhanced association records' that homeowners are allowed access to:

(b) “Enhanced association records” means invoices, receipts and canceled checks for payments made by the association, purchase orders approved by the association, bank account statements for bank accounts in which assessments are deposited or withdrawn, credit card statements for credit cards issued in the name of the association, statements for services rendered, and reimbursement requests submitted to the association.

https://www.davis-stirling.com/HOME/Statutes/Civil-Code-5200#:~:text=(b)%20%E2%80%9CEnhanced%20association%20records,in%20the%20name%20of%20the

Note - when I request documents in California I specifically ask for them in 'electronic format' to be emailed to me. Originally, our HOA attorney indicated I needed to pay a per page copying fee as well as drive to the PMC's office to pay and pick them up. I pointed out the below section and so far, when they do send me the documents I have requested it has been by email and there isn't any charge (the PMC claims they are 'green' and everything has been scanned anyways) If they had to manually redact something, I would expect to pay something though.

Civil Code § 5205(h). Inspection of Records

(h) Requesting parties shall have the option of receiving specifically identified records by electronic transmission or machine-readable storage media as long as those records can be transmitted in a redacted format that does not allow the records to be altered. The cost of duplication shall be limited to the direct cost of producing the copy of a record in that electronic format. The association may deliver specifically identified records by electronic transmission or machine-readable storage media as long as those records can be transmitted in a redacted format that prevents the records from being altered
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Very funny.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NattyM on 07/20/2023 8:08 PM

A few unit owners requested to see the condos bank statements and the board responded to us saying this:
“Please be advised that as these are financial records that include account and routing numbers for association accounts therefore the association attorney will be present ensuring this information is redacted from the documents before they are scanned. The scanning of a document and uploading via internet without such redaction could pose a security issue and therefore must be done in an appropriate manner.”

My questions are:
1) why does the attorney need to be there?
It does not matter. What you should be keeping in mind is this, from Florida statutes:

The right to inspect the records includes the right to make or obtain copies, at the reasonable expense, if any, of the member or authorized representative of such member.

The condo association will almost assuredly bill you for the COA attorney's time.

You should either hire your own attorney to figure out how to get what you want, or only ask for those records specifically mentioned in FS 718 as being "official records."
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
I believe Florida requires the cost of copying to be "reasonable." Charging atty fees I'm thinking would not be reasonable.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 07/21/2023 9:38 AM
I believe Florida requires the cost of copying to be "reasonable." Charging atty fees I'm thinking would not be reasonable.
First, I believe the reality is as LoriM15 already indicated: Florida statutes do not expressly, or even vaguely IMO, require that the COA provide the bank statements. One could even argue that the HOA is being generous in even offering the bank statements.

Second, of course what this HOA is saying is required for legal and liability protection is pretty much ridiculous. That's life when a volunteer HOA Board asks for an attorney to make sure all i's are dotted and t's crossed.

Third, the OP should stick with requesting only that which Florida statutes and the bylaws say he/she can inspect.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Regardless, the cost of copying must be reasonable if copying is allowed.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Given the redactions required; the HOA's need to protect itself; the board's fiduciary duty; et cetera, AFAIC it's easy to argue that what the HOA states is required is reasonable.

And regardless, the OP simply does not have the legal right to look at bank statements. Arguably the OP is the one being unreasonable.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
The attorney probably does not have to be there.
It is unknown whether any redactions are required at all.
See if you can find some case law, Natty.
Not good when board is trying to hide financial information.
LoriM15 (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
I'd like to know why they have requested bank statements. There is just so much we don't know and posters here going to "the board is trying to hide something" is just ridiculous. None of us know the circumstances.

There should be monthly general ledger reports and, as required in Florida for most COA's, a yearly audited financial report. Have they seen those?

I get that we have a couple of very vocal California residents who post a lot and have had bad experiences with their HOAs or COAs. One of them posted recently to another member here "you don't have to comment on every post". Take your own advice.

This is Florida law, not California. We have a very detailed, robust statute for our HOAs and COAs. Not all associations are trying to hide things from homeowners. Florida requires that condos with more than 150 units post, among other documents, monthly financials, yearly financials, and budgets.

If you have a group that is asking for three years of past bank statements, then there's a severe conflict. As a board member, protecting the association and myself, I would ask that our attorney review the material also. This also might be a requirement of the board's Directors and Operators insurance attorney. As I said before, none of us know enough detail about this to comment about the circumstances.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
If I were on a board where a manager freely provided bank account statements showing the account number and routing number of the HOA's bank account to owners, I would motion to get the attorney on the phone immediately. Until then, the manager would be ordered to stop providing this and any other records to owners.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LoriM15 on 07/21/2023 11:02 AM
I'd like to know why they have requested bank statements. There is just so much we don't know and posters here going to "the board is trying to hide something" is just ridiculous. None of us know the circumstances.

There should be monthly general ledger reports and, as required in Florida for most COA's, a yearly audited financial report. Have they seen those?

I get that we have a couple of very vocal California residents who post a lot and have had bad experiences with their HOAs or COAs. One of them posted recently to another member here "you don't have to comment on every post". Take your own advice.

This is Florida law, not California. We have a very detailed, robust statute for our HOAs and COAs. Not all associations are trying to hide things from homeowners. Florida requires that condos with more than 150 units post, among other documents, monthly financials, yearly financials, and budgets.

If you have a group that is asking for three years of past bank statements, then there's a severe conflict. As a board member, protecting the association and myself, I would ask that our attorney review the material also. This also might be a requirement of the board's Directors and Operators insurance attorney. As I said before, none of us know enough detail about this to comment about the circumstances.

I believe it is illegal in Florida to ask why someone wants a record.
And it seems bank statements are not on the list of records that can't be ordered but all financial statements can be ordered.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 07/21/2023 11:17 AM
I believe it is illegal in Florida to ask why someone wants a record.
Read the relevant Florida statutes. What you posted above is flatly false.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
http://www.myfloridalicense.com/dbpr/lsc/documents/OfficialRecordsofourCondominiumAssociation.pdf

Can't require the purpose of the request.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 07/21/2023 11:52 AM
http://www.myfloridalicense.com/dbpr/lsc/documents/OfficialRecordsofourCondominiumAssociation.pdf

Can't require the purpose of the request.
FS 617 says the owner has to provide a proper purpose or the corporation can deny the request.
LizD3 (California)
Posts: 200
Posted:
Some questions make sense, but this board sometimes asks questions that, while they may satisfy a curiosity, are irrelevant.

It is irrelevant why the financial statements are desired. It is enough that they are. And responsible of the owners to want to review them.

Re: routing number, it is public information: any bank will tell you what it is.

Re: account number: it is on every check the Association writes. So it is not secret. And you can’t withdraw funds with just an account number. Otherwise, we'd all have big worries from all the utilities, vendors, etc. that we write checks to. Although, if you were grossly dishonest, you could use the number to deposit funds into the Association account (oh my).

So calling in an attorney is absurd. I'd refuse to pay.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LizD3 on 07/21/2023 12:16 PM

Re: routing number, it is public information: any bank will tell you what it is.

Re: account number: it is on every check the Association writes. So it is not secret. And you can’t withdraw funds with just an account number. Otherwise, we'd all have big worries from all the utilities, vendors, etc. that we write checks to. Although, if you were grossly dishonest, you could use the number to deposit funds into the Association account (oh my).
Fair points. And yet the collective "wisdom" of google says not to share bank account numbers. For example, see https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/bank-account-numbers-why-should-we-protect-them-yogesh-agarwal/

Quote:
Posted By LizD3 on 07/21/2023 12:16 PM
So calling in an attorney is absurd. I'd refuse to pay.
This is your right. Subsequently the HOA has yet another reason to refuse to share the bank statements with you.
LizD3 (California)
Posts: 200
Posted:
You account number is on your check. So every person you wrote a check to has your bank account number. And every business. Which means every vendor has it. Every utility. Every relative, friend, store. The government has it. Your dog walker has it. And so on.

Too late, the cat (or dog) is out of the bag.

And I do not put my faith in the collective wisdom of Google. Quantity is not quality. I’ll take the word of my bank manager over the nameless, faceless, ravening horde any day.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
You have the right to INSPECT the records. No one said they had to make you copies. If they do, it's usually 10 cents a copy a page. That is about what Staples charges. The HOA has a right to get their money back they spend.

As for looking at the bank statement, they offer no real perspective. Look at your own bank statements. What if someone looked at them and saw a charge for $45 for bandages at CVS? Are they going to jump to the conclusion that you cut yourself? What if you spent the money on bandages for a Halloween costume party the HOA was having? Where is the perspective of if the money was justly spent or a waste of bandages?

You need the meeting notes and attending meetings. Be involved not the person over the shoulder... No one likes that even if it is "your right".

Former HOA President
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Your HOA pays for Halloween costume parties?
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 07/21/2023 12:15 PM
Posted By TerriS6 on 07/21/2023 11:52 AM
http://www.myfloridalicense.com/dbpr/lsc/documents/OfficialRecordsofourCondominiumAssociation.pdf

Can't require the purpose of the request.
FS 617 says the owner has to provide a proper purpose or the corporation can deny the request.

Totally different code.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
No they don't. No one does. This was an EXAMPLE of how you don't know HOW that expense you see is applied and in what context. Seeing an amount written does not give you context on why an HOA spent the money they did.

We wrote a check for repairs for a window that was leaking. The receipt would say "Window repairs". It was written to an individual that was a HOA member. You would see the check and go? Look the HOA doesn't own any windows! Why are they paying for window repairs? Why are they paying this member's window repairs??? Why the HOA must be paying kick backs to a HOA member etc... Reality? The windows at the clubhouse were leaking. The member is a handyman. He was paid to fix the leaking windows. Would you know that if you saw a check written to a HOA member in the bank statements? No. Thus witch hunting to find a reason to complain without context.

Former HOA President
LizD3 (California)
Posts: 200
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 07/21/2023 2:11 PM
Look the HOA doesn't own any windows! The windows at the clubhouse were leaking.

Doesn't the HOA own the clubhouse? Which means the HOA owns the windows?
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Board can't ask for reason to inspect/copy records.
718 is really hard to read the correct section but it ends in 11c1

"The association may adopt reasonable rules regarding the frequency, time, location, notice, and manner of record inspection and copying BUT MAY NOT REQUIRE A MEMBER TO DEMONSTRATE ANY PURPOSE OR STATE ANY REASON FOR THE INSPECTION."
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 07/21/2023 2:07 PM
Posted By ElleN on 07/21/2023 12:15 PM
Posted By TerriS6 on 07/21/2023 11:52 AM
http://www.myfloridalicense.com/dbpr/lsc/documents/OfficialRecordsofourCondominiumAssociation.pdf

Can't require the purpose of the request.
FS 617 says the owner has to provide a proper purpose or the corporation can deny the request.


Totally different code.
What are you smoking? FS 617 applies to every condo association in Florida.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 07/21/2023 3:29 PM
Board can't ask for reason to inspect/copy records.
718 is really hard to read the correct section but it ends in 11c1

"The association may adopt reasonable rules regarding the frequency, time, location, notice, and manner of record inspection and copying BUT MAY NOT REQUIRE A MEMBER TO DEMONSTRATE ANY PURPOSE OR STATE ANY REASON FOR THE INSPECTION."
I stand corrected. Thank you for providing a citation from FS 718. Since FS 718 is apposite, it trumps what FS 617 says.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NattyM on 07/20/2023 8:08 PM

A few unit owners requested to see the condos bank statements and the board responded to us saying this:
“Please be advised that as these are financial records that include account and routing numbers for association accounts therefore the association attorney will be present ensuring this information is redacted from the documents before they are scanned. The scanning of a document and uploading via internet without such redaction could pose a security issue and therefore must be done in an appropriate manner.”

My questions are:
1) why does the attorney need to be there?
2) do we need to redacted the account and routing numbers before making copies. ( we’re requesting 3years of all the bank statements)

If you ask them not to scan and send via internet but just copy and hand them to you, would that alleviate their need to have atty present?
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
I think having an attorney (or the PM or a board member) may be a holdover from the days of paper records, when it was important to preserve the originals.

Or if a particular homeowner has threatened legal action against the association, it's absolutely appropriate to have the attorney present. (Not saying that this is the case here.)

Redacting account numbers or personally identifiable information is just basic security. Data is a corporate asset, and the board is obligated to protect it.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CathyA3 on 07/22/2023 12:02 PM
I think having an attorney (or the PM or a board member) may be a holdover from the days of paper records, when it was important to preserve the originals.

Or if a particular homeowner has threatened legal action against the association, it's absolutely appropriate to have the attorney present. (Not saying that this is the case here.)

Redacting account numbers or personally identifiable information is just basic security. Data is a corporate asset, and the board is obligated to protect it.

The reason given for having atty was internet security - scanning, uploading, sending via internet. Internet security isn’t needed if internet isn’t being used. If board doesn’t know what should be redacted or not, or what is confidential or not, they should resign.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 07/22/2023 12:21 PM... snip ...
If board doesn’t know what should be redacted or not, or what is confidential or not, they should resign.


That's the theory. Unfortunately many associations don't have the luxury of people lining up to serve on the board. What they do have is a surplus of people who refuse to do it.
LizD3 (California)
Posts: 200
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CathyA3 on 07/22/2023 1:30 PM
Posted By TerriS6 on 07/22/2023 12:21 PM... snip ...
If board doesn’t know what should be redacted or not, or what is confidential or not, they should resign.

That's the theory. Unfortunately many associations don't have the luxury of people lining up to serve on the board. What they do have is a surplus of people who refuse to do it.

Cathy is right, getting sufficient people on the Board is a problem. But Terri is right, too. Board members take on responsible for what is, for many people, the largest asset they own. If they don’t know what they are doing, they have a fiduciary duty to educate themselves so they manage those assets responsibly, knowledgeably, and intelligently. Otherwise, they can do more harm than good.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
No one who volunteer to be on their board thinks "fiduciary duty" I should know it and do it. It is always the other people who insist on it whenever a decision goes wrong or not in their opinion. It is not that it is not being done. It is just people's opinions of it differs when they do not get what they want from others...

Former HOA President
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LizD3 on 07/22/2023 6:30 PM
Board members take on responsible for what is, for many people, the largest asset they own. If they don’t know what they are doing, they have a fiduciary duty to educate themselves so they manage those assets responsibly, knowledgeably, and intelligently. Otherwise, they can do more harm than good.
This would have meaning if you added that owners have a responsibility, as parties to the contractual terms that covenants are, not to waste board and management time with accusations of wrongdoing having no basis in the covenants or statutes.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
ElleN just cannot abide the expressions of others unless they align 100% with her own.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TerriS6 on 07/23/2023 8:33 AM
ElleN just cannot abide the expressions of others unless they align 100% with her own.
Thank you. This is further evidence that you think owners have no responsibility to have a basis in the covenants or statutes for their accusations of wrongdoing against a board. You are a credit to the Vocational Dissident movement.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
I've often commented that the angriest homeowners are often the ones who know the least, because they assume that if they don't understand what they're looking at, it must be because someone is deliberately hiding things or doing things wrong.

This behavior is not benign. We lost our entire board a couple months ago largely because of the actions of our vocational dissident group - the former directors stated outright that this was the reason they would no longer serve. It's already difficult to find homeowners who are willing to be board members - and when the few willing souls see the type of abuse they may be letting themselves in for, you can't blame them for saying "no way".

Vocational dissidents nearly always say that they want to improve their communities - and who knows, they may even believe it themselves. But their real goal is conflict, and they're blind to the damage that they do. And be very clear, they do damage their communities through their actions. Nobody enjoys living in a war zone, aside from the ones who are stirring up trouble. And heaven help the community when a vocational dissident ends up on the board, because that board will have a hard time getting much accomplished.

LizD3 (California)
Posts: 200
Posted:
Melissa: Fiduciary duty is the guiding light for everything a Board does. Any Board member who does NOT think “fiduciary duty” should be shoved off the Board with blinding speed.

Ellen (is it Ellen or Elle?): It is the smart owner who is diligent and questions anything they believe may be incorrect. Sometimes, that means they make a mistake. In which case, it is the smart Board member who educates them. I’d rather have an involved owner who makes some mistakes and needs help understanding the CC&Rs, etc, than an apathetic one who does not question anything, any day.

Cathy: It is dangerous to make sweeping generalizations. Such as assuming the angriest homeowners believe that if they don't understand something it is due to subterfuge or deceit. Or that their goal is conflict. Or that they like to live in a war zone. This may be true for some, but it is not true for all. Instead of blindly assuming the worst, wouldn't it be more productive to find out why the owner is angry instead of making a sweeping genralization? Because, sometimes, an owner actually has just cause.
TerriS6 (California)
Posts: 3,284
Posted:
In our association, it is the board members except one who are the dissidents. Hard for some people to accept.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
My take: I think vocational dissidents' real goal is control. The vocational dissident wants to call his or her own shots. But here is a pesky HOA Board or HOA manager saying an owner cannot do as he or she pleases with his or her very own real estate.

Of course the effort to wrest control from boards will nearly always yield conflict and destruction.

I agree with all else in CathyA3's post.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LizD3 on 07/23/2023 12:30 PM
Ellen (is it Ellen or Elle?): It is the smart owner who is diligent and questions anything they believe may be incorrect. Sometimes, that means they make a mistake. In which case, it is the smart Board member who educates them. I’d rather have an involved owner who makes some mistakes and needs help understanding the CC&Rs, etc, than an apathetic one who does not question anything, any day.
I agree that a board that wishes to be effective will recognize that thoughtful, humble educating is often key to success.

One caveat: Ideally a board should be able to reason with an owner, and vice versa. Often one side (either the board or an owner or both) is profoundly lacking in an understanding of the legal structure of HOAs and the financial aspects of a corporation/association. As a result I think communicating with each other is often unlikely to lead to an understanding in the space of say, a single open forum segment of a single board meeting.

I have long felt that one of thee best education tools is to respond to an owner, "Show me where in the covenants, bylaws or statutes it says what you claim. If you cannot do it now, bring what you find later to the next meeting. Because the board is required by law to comply with these documents and stay within their boundaries. The covenants, bylaws and statutes are everything. ... I look forward to hearing what you find."

I wonder if every HOA had its own little online HOATalk forum, with veteran owners and veteran directors alike participating from across the country, things would be noticeably better. Maybe not a lot better, but better, anyway.

It is "Elle."
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 07/23/2023 12:34 PM
My take: I think vocational dissidents' real goal is control. The vocational dissident wants to call his or her own shots. But here is a pesky HOA Board or HOA manager saying an owner cannot do as he or she pleases with his or her very own real estate.

Of course the effort to wrest control from boards will nearly always yield conflict and destruction.

I agree with all else in CathyA3's post.

You're right about the control issue. The thing is, these folks already have an avenue for that: get themselves elected to the board where they will have a say in how the community is run. But they almost never do that - because they want control without doing the hard work of being a director. Our recent kerfuffle with our board was a perfect example: all three board positions were vacant, and not a single member of that group signed a letter of intent prior to our second attempt at an election.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CathyA3 on 07/23/2023 1:05 PM
The thing is, these folks [vocational dissidents] already have an avenue for [getting "control"]: get themselves elected to the board where they will have a say in how the community is run. But they almost never do that - because they want control without doing the hard work of being a director.
Just saying: To me what you wrote is of the utmost importance. Persistent criticism of one's neighbor without being willing to step up to do the unpaid, all-volunteer work that one's neighbor is doing violates, wait for it, the social contract. I think this violation (of the social contract) explains precisely why vocational dissidents' conduct is so corrosive and destructive.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here