💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

BillD16 (Texas)
Posts: 973
Posted:
I’ve been busy getting our community pool up and running again after a couple of years of COVID and no lifeguards.

It’s been going well, and in response the residents of my community have made it clear that I’m a racist defensive white male asshole with no leadership skills and an insane lust for power. It’s been special.

My question: can anyone point me at any kind of treatment or analysis of “The Tragedy of the Commons” that focuses on a community swimming pool? My Google-fu has let me down. Essentially, I’d like to find something like Hardin’s article{1}{2} that talks about a shared community pool. Does such a thing even exist?

Thank you in advance,

Bill

{1} https://www.hendrix.edu/uploadedFiles/Admission/GarrettHardinArticle.pdf

{2} yeah, I know Hardin’s been ‘canceled’ recently. Honestly, I don’t care and it doesn’t invalidate what he and Lloyd and others were saying.

HOA Board ex-President
Austin, Texas USA

“You can’t put too much water in a nuclear reactor”
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
I didn't find anything, but I'd be more interested in your issues with the pool. I know the tragedy of the common refers to overusing a resource to the point that no one benefits, so what's going on?

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
BillD16 (Texas)
Posts: 973
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 06/15/2023 3:49 AM
I didn't find anything, but I'd be more interested in your issues with the pool. I know the tragedy of the common refers to overusing a resource to the point that no one benefits, so what's going on?

I’ll post more detail sometime soon when I have time to write. and have had a chance to organize my thoughts. As with a lot of material here, even if it’s not of immediate use, someone down the road might find it helpful.

Thank you for your interest. If it weren’t for stuff I’ve learned here from you guys, I’d have run away screaming on this one.

Bill

HOA Board ex-President
Austin, Texas USA

“You can’t put too much water in a nuclear reactor”
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Welcome to the club. I was compared to "Hitler" and named "Dictator". I kind of liked the ring of that. Meant you had to do what I say then doesn't it till you do something...

Surprise- I had a majority of people who wanted to bury our pool completely. This is in ALABAMA in the SUMMER! There are people who don't like pools or the taking care of them. Find no benefit. So they are not going to like those who do find the value in them.

Good luck you privileged white man... LOL!

Former HOA President
MarkM19 (Texas)
Posts: 1,459
Posted:
Bill,
Just remember that.

"If you do not have Critics you are probably not very Successful"
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BillD16 on 06/15/2023 3:17 AM

It’s been going well, and in response the residents of my community have made it clear that I’m a racist defensive white male asshole with no leadership skills and an insane lust for power. It’s been special.
Per chance is the "racist" label what has you particularly displeased/unhappy/maybe seething?

My 2023 opinion: Folks who use either the "racist," "sexist," or "anti-semitic" label would do well to cease doing so. Why? Because it does not explain to the target what exactly is wrong. In fact there may be nothing wrong. There may be bad manners rather than say White Supremacists. There may be different experiences that result in (OMG; could it be?) a different understanding of language, culture and nuance.

Those who use "racist," "sexist," and "anti-semitic" and the like would do better to instead offer constructive criticism of why xyz bothers them.

I was furious when Whoopee Goldberg was attacked and alleged to be some kind of anti-semite. This assertion is nonsense. Those making it lost much credibility with me. And to back it up, a well-known Jewish academic wrote an essay that opined the same. (Of course the professor was way more eloquent than I was, not to mention he spoke of history to a great extent in his discussion.) We are not supposed to be political here at HOATalk. I am trying to indicate that use of labels (like those I mention above) is often not helpful.

Also too, every person using these labels and broad-painting brushes (for a specific act, for goodness' sake) is likely as flawed as the next guy/gal.

You should consider running by exactly why the contention is being made you are a racist, and see if this group can suss out whether the contention has any merit or is total bullsh-t.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BillD16 on 06/15/2023 3:17 AM
...and in response the residents of my community have made it clear that I’m a racist defensive white male asshole with no leadership skills and an insane lust for power. It’s been special.


Board service in a nutshell.

It may help to know what has prompted them to react this way. If nothing else, it may give us some more search terms that will find something that is relevant even if it doesn't apply to pools.

IMHO, pools seem to be lightning rods (unfortunate image there) because people are just testier in summer weather. You don't have riots in winter, at least in my area, because Mother Nature is straight up trying to kill us all.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
With Shelia & Cathy--Please give us some hints about the fuss. I've seen how much your care about your community and that you were kinda excited to open the pool and get it all set for your neighbors. But.......??????

Have you tried to craft your own Enclosure Acts?? There are some who say the real tragedy of the commons were those Acts, which kept so many out of the commons. With no access to fuel, wood, game, etc., many people rapidly became impoverished.
BillD16 (Texas)
Posts: 973
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkM19 on 06/15/2023 6:49 AM
Bill,
Just remember that.

"If you do not have Critics you are probably not very Successful"

Thank you, guys. You’re the best.

Since there’s interest, I’ll definitely post a writeup here soon. It’s a story with a lot of moving parts, though, and the fluid, concise style that many of you command does not come easy to me.

I’ll attempt to give you a very brief overview: ~600 homes in Austin; our one amenity is our community pool. We haven’t had lifeguards for the past couple of years due to COVID and the recent high price and scarcity of lifeguards. Our pool committee chair quit about a year ago after holding the position for several years. This year we managed to secure lifeguards for a reasonable price, on weekends and holidays. The pool is surrounded by a fence, and uses an electronic key-fob system to control access. Earlier this year we had a lot of problems with a vandal/trespasser, and last year we had problems in general with non-residents accessing the pool and throwing parties and trashing the place. One, no two last things:

We have lousy communications. We use FB a lot. I know we shouldn’t.

Our Board is lovable but dysfunctional. I’ve been doing most of the heavy lifting, especially this year. I don’t mind it - but there’s a definite temptation to cut corners when I’m running with something.

I will make no claims of being a perfect actor in all of this stuff.

In short: lifeguards! Immediately there are complaints. A pattern develops: “The lifeguard was rude to me and said I was breaking a rule! I don’t like that rule, and I don’t think I should have to follow it! And the lifeguards are racist!” Contested rules include the ‘adult swim rule’, the ‘no alcohol’ rule, the ‘no tightrope-walking on the lap-lane marker rope’ rule, and (probably the least favorite of rules) the ‘sign-in’ rule, as in “the lifeguard made me sign in! I’ve never had to do that before! And they make me wait until my guests are here!” This last is an artifact of the LGs attempting to prevent tailgaters.

I was at the pool to meet the (RCA certified) lifeguards on their first day. I gave them three instructions:

1. Y’all are professional lifeguards. Go out there and give us some professional lifeguarding.
2. Please try to keep tailgaters and non-residents out.
3. If anyone gives you grief, tell them “we’re following the Board’s instructions” and feel free to send them to me. Because we’re paying you to lifeguard, not to justify and explain your reasoning.

The lifeguards seemed happy with this. And I’ve observed them and they are really, really good at their job (frankly, I lucked out getting people this good for as little as we had available to spend).

The complaints started almost immediately. “I want your names and I’ll have your job!” is one of the milder ones. The LGs compile a report each day of the pool water quality, # of swimmers, and ‘other’. Some of the ‘other’ stuff shames me, that I live with such neighbors (I’ll give you some select examples later). There are indeed cries of ‘racism!’ but the only racism I’m aware of was directed at one of the LGs (the LGs are Mexican American). And out on FB, a resident SJW begins advancing that the LGs are pushing an agenda set in place by one of the Board members (me) to ‘police’ the pool and everyone should remember this for the upcoming election. I challenged this SJW to run for the Board and was told “I would! (but I’m a renter)”. I have no idea what this person’s problem is.

I have to end this here, sorry - we’ve actually got a working meeting tonight with our PM to get our annual meeting scheduled, and I’ve got some stuff to take care of beforehand. More to come, like this one guy who is hinting that I’m a racist *and* a pedophile (“he sat in his car, eyeing the children at the playground”){1}. Plus a rather sketchy person who is volunteering to be pool committee chair and another Board member thinks we should accept them ‘just because’. The LGs will be back tomorrow and I’ll be happy to see them - they’re pleasant and down-to-earth and good at what they do and I fear that my butthole neighbors will make them walk off of the job.

Oh - I’m sharing this, and small, measured amounts of sympathy are absolutely welcome. But no pity, please. It’s stressful for sure, but I’ve dealt with far, far worse in the past.

Best regards (and CA3 for Board! Receivership is Bad! Bad! Bad!)

Bill

{1} in fact, I sat in my car listening to the last half of Filter’s “Hey Man Nice Shot” at high volume because it’s a great song plus, weirdo that I am, loud music relaxes me before I need to go talk to people F2F. Argh! And it’s the idiocy and annoyance of falling into these ‘traps’ where I feel like I need to explain myself because … argh.

HOA Board ex-President
Austin, Texas USA

“You can’t put too much water in a nuclear reactor”
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
My my. I am sorry about how you are being treated.

Just two things:

Adult swim rule = Fair Housing Act violation (discrimination based on having kids, meaning familial status). HUD is clear about this. I think the HOA needs to get rid of this rule.

Any idiot owner or idiot renter referring to a lifeguard by racist epithet is inviting a lawsuit by the lifeguard against the HOA.

I hope you can be strong and not ruminate on this horrible abuse being heaped on you personally and entirely inappropriately.

MarkM19 (Texas)
Posts: 1,459
Posted:
Bill,
I think your note explained a lot and you are better than you give yourself credit for my friend. I will say that as I was reading your note I cringed every time you said Lifeguard. In our community they can only be referred to as Pool Monitors because LGs are expected to save lives. If yours are truly certified as such they should not be dealing with people at the entrance or getting involved with detailed conversations with unhappy people at the Pool. It is hard to do both. It seems to me like your people are Monitors. I would recommend changing the language because of possible trouble down the road. Most pools have guest are swimming at their own risk and I assume your say something similar. I also make a point to tell our monitors that if they speak to anyone about the rules they are to say, "The Board" and never mention anyone's name. It is the board's decision if you take on the responsibility to be the Pool Chairperson.

Any HOA board has similar issues and if you are like me I pray for rain and cold weather till the season ends.
LisaB21 (Texas)
Posts: 97
Posted:
Adult Swim = Hourly Swim Break. Use the right terminology. All swimmers, and the Lifeguards, need a break out of the pool, and off the Lifeguard stand each hour for ten minutes. The Fair Housing Act caused the change in terminology about 3 years ago or so.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
So Bill's HOA can "enclose" (close off) the commons per Lisa. But is this "break" required? In the olden days, the Enclosures Acts not only impoverished many, they pissed them off.

It's excellent, Bill, that you found pool monitors and good ones too. Shortage in our coastal beaches & public pools too.

Damn shame you're getting grief about your efforts.
LetA (Nevada)
Posts: 2,679
Posted:
I wish we could fill in our pool and sell the two lots to a builder. The pool is nothing but a gigantic PITA because of FHA regs. The same clowns
that pass these laws are FAT CHIT cats that live in multimillion dollar estates in a guard gated community each with their own Olympic sized pool
and jacuzzi. These clowns don't have to put up with the grief that they cause.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
This is more of a longer-term solution and may not be feasible ... but are there any "professionals" out there who would attend a board meeting or whatever and explain how "the rules" allow for safe operating of the pool and without the rules you'd have to close? "A Safe Pool is an Open Pool!"

We've had success with getting the pros in talk to residents about various topics.

Another longer-term idea not directly related to the pool, and since you've already referred to it: consider dumping social media. It rewards bad behavior, so you get more of it. It also tends to discourage the folks who don't like the bad behavior, so they leave. Result: amplified, concentrated bad behavior. I think this is a significant contributor to our dysfunctional social discourse these days. Social media has reset people's notions of acceptable behavior.

(My theory about pools:
* It's summer and everybody is cranky.
* It's 2023 and everybody is crankier.
* You say "pool" and everybody thinks they're 10 years old again - with a 10-year-old's maturity level.

I share LetA's opinion of pools. Also, as an adult, thanks to the Fair Housing laws I pretty much can't use the pool they way I want to, which is swim laps. So I'm basically paying to entertain everybody else's kids. I'll pass.)
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LisaB21 on 06/15/2023 7:00 PM
Adult Swim = Hourly Swim Break. Use the right terminology.
Yup, use the right terminology.

Adult swim = adults only in the pool.

Hourly swim break = no one in the pool, and the lifeguards get a break.

Big difference.

The FHA was not changed (Lisa, use the right terminology). HUD might have issued guidance.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LetA on 06/15/2023 9:09 PM
I wish we could fill in our pool and sell the two lots to a builder. The pool is nothing but a gigantic PITA because of FHA regs.
I think pools are terrible for HOAs for many reasons.

It is amazing that there is an expectation today that a volunteer board has to figure out whether it should have either lifeguards, pool monitors or both. Then a volunteer (or manager, overseen by the board) has to coordinate this. If lifeguards are not required, but then a HOA hires them anyway (and has been discussed here in the past), so people think the HOA is responsible for their pool safety, is the HOA undertaking more potential liability?

What is happening to BillD16 (and past pool coordinators at his HOA) is terrible. I think this is right up there with the worst of HOAs.

I remain grateful for the history SheliaH has provided about her condo/HOA: Years ago it voted to fill in the pool. Brilliant. It's just too much for mere, already heavily burdened volunteers to oversee.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/15/2023 7:38 PM
So Bill's HOA can "enclose" (close off) the commons per Lisa. But is this "break" required? In the olden days, the Enclosures Acts not only impoverished many, they pissed them off.
Sorry to make this correction, but the Enclosure Acts took land owned in common and gave right to the property to specific individuals.

The hourly swim break removes access to "the commons" from everyone.

I know of Garrett Hardin's original work (re Tragedy of the Commons) only from reading Jared Diamond's 2005 Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed and related publications/chatter in the WaPo and NY Times. I do not consider a HOA swimming pool to be a very good example of tragedy of the commons. A swimming pool does not exactly run a risk of being depleted, and if it is depleted or eliminated, I would not call it a tragedy. For many, a pool's elimination might be a cause for celebration by anyone sick of the expense and how it burns out directors.
LoriM15 (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
We have two pools with no lifeguards or pool monitors. They are posted "swim at your own risk". We've never had an issue because our community is mostly older people, but recently we have had more kids and a request for a party.

We are considering changing the documents so that there is a limit to the number of guests an owner can bring to the pool before having to declare it a party, sign a waiver and pay a cleaning deposit.

Are we going to run into Fair Housing issues by doing that? I've never had to deal with any Fair Housing issues before and am completely ignorant.

Also, we don't have any kind of disability accomodations and aren't required to because the pool is only open to owners and guests. Are we opening ourselves up to any kind of discrimination issues?
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LoriM15 on 06/16/2023 7:08 AM
We have two pools with no lifeguards or pool monitors. They are posted "swim at your own risk". We've never had an issue because our community is mostly older people, but recently we have had more kids and a request for a party.

We are considering changing the documents so that there is a limit to the number of guests an owner can bring to the pool before having to declare it a party, sign a waiver and pay a cleaning deposit.

Are we going to run into Fair Housing issues by doing that?
I read a lot about fair housing issues. I could be wrong, but I have never heard of any FHA problems related to limiting the number of guests allowed.

Just never set any kind of age limit on the guests, and all should be fine.

Quote:
Posted By LoriM15 on 06/16/2023 7:08 AM
Also, we don't have any kind of disability accomodations and aren't required to because the pool is only open to owners and guests. Are we opening ourselves up to any kind of discrimination issues?
The pool is not open to the public. Consequently the HOA's obligations to accommodate might only arise if a disabled person makes a request to the board for an accommodation, and the board is unreasonable in denying the request. By my reading of HOA and FHA disability case law and discussion, "unreasonable" means: If the accommodation would not cost the HOA anything, and would not impose much, if at all, on other owners' rights, and the HOA still denies the accommodation, the HOA is being unreasonable and is holding itself out to liability for an FHA violation.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
I recommend talking to the association attorney if there are any questions about Fair Housing laws. You have to in any case if you're planning to re-write a portion of your CC&Rs.

Our attorneys recommended that we contact them the minute we got a whiff of a Fair Housing issue, because these laws are unforgiving and even lawyers can occasionally get things wrong if they're not careful. I'd consider it a breach of fiduciary duty if volunteer boards try to navigate the potential issues on their own.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 06/16/2023 7:15 AM
... The pool is not open to the public. Consequently the HOA's obligations to accommodate might only arise if a disabled person makes a request to the board for an accommodation, and the board is unreasonable in denying the request. By my reading of HOA and FHA disability case law and discussion, "unreasonable" means: If the accommodation would not cost the HOA anything, and would not impose much, if at all, on other owners' rights, and the HOA still denies the accommodation, the HOA is being unreasonable and is holding itself out to liability for an FHA violation.

One quibble. Recently I came across information that says in Ohio, any pool that accommodates 3 or more housing units is considered public - which means any HOA or condo pool in our state unless the community is one of those tiny 2-unit ones. This was a surprise.

So double check state laws before you assume your pool is private.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CathyA3 on 06/16/2023 7:51 AM
Posted By ElleN on 06/16/2023 7:15 AM
... The pool is not open to the public. Consequently the HOA's obligations to accommodate might only arise if a disabled person makes a request to the board for an accommodation, and the board is unreasonable in denying the request. By my reading of HOA and FHA disability case law and discussion, "unreasonable" means: If the accommodation would not cost the HOA anything, and would not impose much, if at all, on other owners' rights, and the HOA still denies the accommodation, the HOA is being unreasonable and is holding itself out to liability for an FHA violation.


One quibble. Recently I came across information that says in Ohio, any pool that accommodates 3 or more housing units is considered public - which means any HOA or condo pool in our state unless the community is one of those tiny 2-unit ones.
Noted. Though to quibble further:

-- I think it is "more than three" housing units. That is, three or less housing units using the pool translates to a "private swimming pool" in Ohio.

-- I tried to be careful in my wording, on account of disability law. For one I am not sure that Ohio's designation pertains to disability law. I think it might pertain to pool chemistry and other somewhat more mundane health requirements.

https://odh.ohio.gov/know-our-programs/public-swimming-pools/laws-and-rules

https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-3749.01

https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-administrative-code/chapter-3701-31

So for example the federal chair lift requirement for pools appears to apply only to pools "open to the public" (per the media). A HOA pool is not open to the public.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I wrote above: "There are some who say the real tragedy of the commons were those [Enclosure] Acts, which kept the many out of the commons. With no access to fuel, wood, game, etc., many people rapidly became impoverished." I later added they also became pissed off. ElleN's "correction" was off target given my approach. I, by the way, don't disagree with ElleN that the Acts took land away from the huge "many" and gave it to a small elite few. Not everyone agrees, however, that was a wonderful thing.

So my reference is that "Adult Swim" cuts off the commons from all to benefit some. Some of the some are pissed off. HOA's common areas are named, of course, after "the commons" referenced above. They still exist, at least in France. Old pals retired to a farm with a lot of acreage including some pasture and a forest with a nice stream outside of Bordeaux. While the forest is their "private property," they must allow anyone to use it for hunting, fishing & gathering.. Took them awhile to get used to the sound of occasional gunshots.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/16/2023 9:22 AM
So my reference is that "Adult Swim" cuts off the commons from all to benefit some.
?

Look above. You said it was the hourly swim break (pool off limits to all) that was similar to the Enclosures Act.

An adult swim hour would be similar to the Enclosures Act.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I'm sorry my writing is so unclear. I simply used the word "enclose" in my 2nd post to stick with the Subject. I hope my recent above is clearer. Also my attempt to be cute failed. I should have written "some of the many," vs. my some of the some." Carry on---and on-- ElleN.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I'm sorry my writing is so unclear. I simply used the word "enclose" in my 2nd post to stick with the Subject. I hope my recent above is clearer. Also my attempt to be cute failed. I should have written "some of the many," vs. my some of the some." Carry on---and on-- ElleN.

CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 06/16/2023 9:31 AM
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/16/2023 9:22 AM
So my reference is that "Adult Swim" cuts off the commons from all to benefit some.
?

Look above. You said it was the hourly swim break (pool off limits to all) that was similar to the Enclosures Act.

An adult swim hour would be similar to the Enclosures Act.

The "adult swims" of my childhood were not hours. They lasted 15 minutes and ran from a quarter of to the top of the hour. At a quarter of the lifeguard blew the whistle, the kids got out and the adults got in, and at the top of the hour the adults and kids swapped places. Everybody got to use the pool, everybody got a rest period. And nobody thought this was in any way unjust.

More to the point, this schedule recognizes the fact that kids and adults use the pool differently. Kids like to jump and splash and horse around. Adults often like to exercise. If you insist on having both together, adults will get jumped on and kids will get kicked. Or the adults will say to h*ll with it and not use the pool at all.

Bottom line, no matter how much people ignore it, the upshot of the Fair Housing laws is that adults who want to exercise can't use the pool. It's one of many reasons that people refuse to buy in HOAs/COAs with a pool - because all they'd be doing is paying for someone else's fun and they want to use the amenities their own damm selves.
LoriM15 (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
We have swim lanes set aside by ropes at both our pools. Although we don't have lifeguards, it's a self-policing situation and generally we don't have conflicts. The lap swimmers swim in the lanes (pretty heavily used) and the kids and recreationally swimmers are everywhere else. The only problem we have is that the ropes get stretched and ends get frayed because of the kids who like to hang on them.

When I was a kid, we also had adult swim at our community pool - where I spent nearly all day, every day of every summer. You were allowed to come to the pool without adult supervision when you were 8 if you could pass a swim test (it was a different time and place - I can't even imagine that today). We used to hate when they called adult swim, but now I see that 1) it gave the lifeguards a break and 2) it gave the kids a chance to catch our breath. I find it very sad that the practice of allowing adults in the pool for 10 or 15 minutes without kids has to be covered by a government mandate.

On the other hand, I clearly remember (and am ashamed by) an incident where my parents wanted to use the pool for a pool party for my dad's Junior Achievement group that included African American high school students. It caused a HUGE uproar in our basically all-white community. I'm happy that those days are past and if it took a mandate to make that happen - then I can live with the other parts of the Fair Housing act.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CathyA3 on 06/16/2023 11:50 AM
Posted By ElleN on 06/16/2023 9:31 AM
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/16/2023 9:22 AM
So my reference is that "Adult Swim" cuts off the commons from all to benefit some.
?

Look above. You said it was the hourly swim break (pool off limits to all) that was similar to the Enclosures Act.

An adult swim hour would be similar to the Enclosures Act.


The "adult swims" of my childhood were not hours.
Beg pardon. Post-o by me. I meant some like ten or 15 minute period where, back in the day, the kids got out of the pool and the moms (mostly) got in and swam laps. Just as you described from days gone by.

Regarding kids, pool use and the FHA: You have long had me persuaded that Fair Housing law has tilted absurdly against adults, and especially senior citizens wanting peace and quiet. The new (relatively) 1995-ish HOPA section of the FHA does not have enough teeth.

And I would never be permitted to make my comments above at a HOA or condo association without risking a nasty letter from the association attorney, warning me about discrimination (hostile environment) against families.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LoriM15 on 06/16/2023 12:08 PM
We used to hate when they called adult swim, but now I see that 1) it gave the lifeguards a break and 2) it gave the kids a chance to catch our breath.
You all were angels. For adult swim, my gang descended on the snack bar.
Quote:
Posted By LoriM15 on 06/16/2023 12:08 PM
I find it very sad that the practice of allowing adults in the pool for 10 or 15 minutes without kids has to be covered by a government mandate.

On the other hand, I clearly remember (and am ashamed by) an incident where my parents wanted to use the pool for a pool party for my dad's Junior Achievement group that included African American high school students. It caused a HUGE uproar in our basically all-white community. I'm happy that those days are past and if it took a mandate to make that happen - then I can live with the other parts of the Fair Housing act.
Thank you for sharing this.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
I want to throw in here that BillD16 recently posted that his HOA's pool is so large that a local swim team wanted to use it for practice.

Volunteers in particular should not be responsible for pools this large. It is ridiculous.
BillD16 (Texas)
Posts: 973
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 06/15/2023 3:23 PM
My my. I am sorry about how you are being treated.

Just two things:

Adult swim rule = Fair Housing Act violation (discrimination based on having kids, meaning familial status). HUD is clear about this. I think the HOA needs to get rid of this rule.

Any idiot owner or idiot renter referring to a lifeguard by racist epithet is inviting a lawsuit by the lifeguard against the HOA.

I hope you can be strong and not ruminate on this horrible abuse being heaped on you personally and entirely inappropriately.


Again: thank you, everyone. FWIW, I’m currently in the process of setting up a meeting with our attorney to discuss several pool issues, and the pool rules / FHA stuff is one of them: in short, I’m going to ask them to provide us with a lawyer-approved set of rules that we can slap in place. I see this as one of those things where it’s worth the money to have the lawyer do it so we can say “It is this way because our lawyer doth say so!” It’s sorta funny that, given all of the grief I’ve received over various pool rules, none of the residents have yet bothered to Google and find the FHA stuff. *knock on wood*

I’ve been pondering switching to a system where people have to register their guests. It would be an extremely tough sell, and the jokes about a mob of residents storming my house with torches and pitchforks might not actually be jokes anymore.

Quick comment re The Tragedy of the Commons: I agree that it’s not a perfect fit. But we do indeed have ‘selfish’ residents who are using far more than their fair share of pool resources, making messes, and costing us more money to deal with (not to mention taking the pool out of operation while our pool guy does decontam because someone knew their kid had diarrhea but brought them in anyway. And, oh, they tried to leave without reporting the mess).

Finally: the “idiot owner” who made that remark: if I were truly the “God-King” of the pool that some people claim I am, I would permaban him and his worthless clan for eternity. But the Board won’t let me, and (more importantly) the LG{1} in question wants to drop the matter. I don’t feel I have any choice but to respect their wishes.

I just found out I got stabbed in the back, so I’ll be licking my wounds over in the corner and whimpering “Et tu, Brute?” for the rest of the day. But I’ll be fine - I’m making ribs for dinner!

Bill

PS: I’ve also been finding solace in re-reading George R. R. Martin’s Tuf Voyaging. Which might send the wrong message. But I love the way he manages to stay cool in any situation.

{1} I’m sorry - at this point I can’t go to calling them ‘monitors’ or anything else. If nothing else, they’re proud of being RCA-certified lifeguards. And right now the very last thing I want to do is piss off the LGs.

HOA Board ex-President
Austin, Texas USA

“You can’t put too much water in a nuclear reactor”
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 06/16/2023 12:09 PM
Posted By CathyA3 on 06/16/2023 11:50 AM
Posted By ElleN on 06/16/2023 9:31 AM
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/16/2023 9:22 AM
So my reference is that "Adult Swim" cuts off the commons from all to benefit some.
?

Look above. You said it was the hourly swim break (pool off limits to all) that was similar to the Enclosures Act.

An adult swim hour would be similar to the Enclosures Act.


The "adult swims" of my childhood were not hours.
Beg pardon. Post-o by me. I meant some like ten or 15 minute period where, back in the day, the kids got out of the pool and the moms (mostly) got in and swam laps. Just as you described from days gone by.

Regarding kids, pool use and the FHA: You have long had me persuaded that Fair Housing law has tilted absurdly against adults, and especially senior citizens wanting peace and quiet. The new (relatively) 1995-ish HOPA section of the FHA does not have enough teeth.

And I would never be permitted to make my comments above at a HOA or condo association without risking a nasty letter from the association attorney, warning me about discrimination (hostile environment) against families.

Yup. It's tilted the other way, and discrimination against adults and/or single folks is perfectly fine. PSA to lawmakers: married couples without kids would be astonished to know that they're not a family, especially if they're childless because they're empty-nesters.
LisaB21 (Texas)
Posts: 97
Posted:
why would you not hire a pool management company that not only cleans and maintains the pool year round (cleaning, chemicals, and all mechanical equipment), and provides Life Guards when the pool is open during the summer. I can not imagine trying to manage all that as a volunteer for my Board. The life guards monitor the pool one on the stand if under 25 people in the pool, an additional one on the deck if more than 25 people in the pool. and one of them is at the front desk where everyone has to sign in. Access to the pool is through a gate with a card reader or we provide a App for phones that can be scanned at the card reader, but everyone still has to sign in at the desk after the enter, including any guests (limit of 4 per household). The life guards also clean the restrooms, take out the rah bins on trash days, empty the trash bins on the pool deck, monitor and log water quality/chemicals every hour, and have a first aid kit for any minor scrapes, etc. it is the responsibility of the pool management company to recruit, hire, train, schedule and supervise the lifeguard staff. If any issues arise with lifeguard behavior, we just call the pool management company and they handle it (I did that last week when it was noted that one of the lifeguards was spending much of his time socializing with friends). Established Single Family Home community with 1057 homes, Houston Texas suburb. Worth every dollar we spend.
MarkM19 (Texas)
Posts: 1,459
Posted:
Lisa,
The answer to your question is obvious and I am wondering how you are able to do it. We are in Central Texas and we pay $25. 10 hours a day for our single monitor. If you multiple that time 4 or 5 you are talking about over $1,000 a day for the service. Our Pool season in 7 months long so the math adds up to over $210,000 without mentioning the OT hours for Holiday pay.

Are you really trying to say that your HOA is currently staffed this way?
LisaB21 (Texas)
Posts: 97
Posted:
3 lifeguards Sat/Sun only in May and September from 10Am-9PM. Then 6 days a week (same hours) from Memorial Day weekend to Labor Day weekend (pool is closed on Mondays). $54K per year budget includes Splash Pad Maintenance also. Obviously the monthly expenses are higher May-Sept and then lower during the months that they are providing weekly pool and splash pad maintenance only.
BillD16 (Texas)
Posts: 973
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LisaB21 on 06/16/2023 3:54 PM
why would you not hire a pool management company that not only cleans and maintains the pool year round (cleaning, chemicals, and all mechanical equipment), and provides Life Guards when the pool is open during the summer. I can not imagine trying to manage all that as a volunteer for my Board. The life guards monitor the pool one on the stand if under 25 people in the pool, an additional one on the deck if more than 25 people in the pool. and one of them is at the front desk where everyone has to sign in. Access to the pool is through a gate with a card reader or we provide a App for phones that can be scanned at the card reader, but everyone still has to sign in at the desk after the enter, including any guests (limit of 4 per household). The life guards also clean the restrooms, take out the rah bins on trash days, empty the trash bins on the pool deck, monitor and log water quality/chemicals every hour, and have a first aid kit for any minor scrapes, etc. it is the responsibility of the pool management company to recruit, hire, train, schedule and supervise the lifeguard staff. If any issues arise with lifeguard behavior, we just call the pool management company and they handle it (I did that last week when it was noted that one of the lifeguards was spending much of his time socializing with friends). Established Single Family Home community with 1057 homes, Houston Texas suburb. Worth every dollar we spend.

Lisa - basically what MarkM said. What kind of dues do y’all pay? Our dues have been $500/year for the past 6 years. And while the folks in this group have convinced me that it is no great sin to raise the dues - currently we don’t need to: our reserves are fully funded, we’re not running a deficit. I’ve wondered about engaging some kind of full-service pool company as you suggested. I have no idea what that would cost but I’m guessing it would require raising the dues substantially. Additionally, there are things like: we’ve used the same guy for pool maintenance for about 10 years, and he’s very good, very devoted - Monday is “pool cleaning day” but I’m used to seeing him at our pool at any day of the week, he’s very independent - and two weeks ago I had to call him after-hours on Friday *and* Saturday evening - I have his direct line - and he responded immediately both times. We just underwent a surprise involuntary transition to a new PMC last year when our previous PMC was acquired - the change has been largely positive but … hell, I’m not going to try to justify it. A full-service pool company does make sense, I’ve thought about it, and if our residents can’t deal with the INDIGNITY of my SECRET RACIST WHITE MALE AGENDA to SUBJUGATE ALL SWIMMERS by LIMITING THE SIZE OF THEIR POOL TOYS … that may indeed be what they end up with. But I haven’t given up yet.

Bill

HOA Board ex-President
Austin, Texas USA

“You can’t put too much water in a nuclear reactor”
LisaB21 (Texas)
Posts: 97
Posted:
Our dues are $525/year for the past two years, and $500/year before then for several years. I think you have to look at it as a % of your income since I have no idea what your other budget items are. Our pool management company budget is a bit under 10% of our total annual budget. We also have fully funded reserves and come in at or under budget every year. I forget, how many homes do you have in your community Bill? My 54K pool expense is equal to around $51 per year per home.
We are also always over 96% collected so that helps. I think it is worth exploring to have a professionally managed pool and take that off the Boards plate.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
So interesting and relevant to read about a full pool service biz. I think getting your attorney's advice is your best chance for a better experience, Bill.

Our pool is open 5am - 10pm and our HOA is 95% adults. Some do have grandkids who visit, but the point is there's rarely more than 6-8 users in the pool. Still, all of our lap swimmers-- I'd say 8-10 regulars and a few part-timers swim before, I'd say 10 am. Some seem to before work. There are plenty of times when the pool is empty but lap swimmers never use it during the day.

So I can't help here. We did have a rule that no pool toys were allowed, but since it was never a problem, we got rid of it. We did have a rule that no Unit could have more than 5 guests, but that was deleted too as unnecessary.

BillD16 (Texas)
Posts: 973
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/16/2023 6:53 PM
So interesting and relevant to read about a full pool service biz. I think getting your attorney's advice is your best chance for a better experience, Bill.

Our pool is open 5am - 10pm and our HOA is 95% adults. Some do have grandkids who visit, but the point is there's rarely more than 6-8 users in the pool. Still, all of our lap swimmers-- I'd say 8-10 regulars and a few part-timers swim before, I'd say 10 am. Some seem to before work. There are plenty of times when the pool is empty but lap swimmers never use it during the day.

So I can't help here. We did have a rule that no pool toys were allowed, but since it was never a problem, we got rid of it. We did have a rule that no Unit could have more than 5 guests, but that was deleted too as unnecessary.


Thanks, Kerry!

My neighborhood is 'diverse': we've got lots of families with kids, a fair number of retirees and empty-nesters, young couples just getting families started. But I've noticed that most of the lap-swimmers - and there are a lot of them - tend to be adults and tend to aim for the 6am-10am timeframe. The whole lap-swimming thing is new to me; I grew up swimming in lakes where the emphasis was on boating, fishing, not drowning, and avoiding snakes.

Oh, the Pool Toy thing - that's just me trying to be funny. Residents griping that the 'rude' LGs called out some pool toys as too big, there was indignation, then someone pointed out that there is apparently a real safety hazard with oversized pool toys (they obscure the LGs vision [details elided]). It's just one of several rules that people have complained about, and then someone has pointed out that there's a valid reason for the rule, but of course no-one wants to admit they were *wrong*, or that possibly there are worthwhile rules that they don't understand.

I don't want to tempt fate (because it's only Friday) but it seems like things have calmed down. The LGs reported that the day went very smoothly, so I am cautiously optimistic.

Here are some entries from the LG logs from last Saturday: (lightly edited and reformatted; PG-13)


12:28 Mr. S came in and asked if we were pool nazis. I explained that we are lifeguards. He then asked if something happened to him while he is in the pool, would we save his life? I said yes.

12:29 Ms. R brought in a huge float, I explained that it was too big for the pool and unsafe. She then asked for my name. I gave it to her.

12:50 I called break. Mr. S told his wife to tell me fuck you. I asked him to refrain from that language. He then proceeded to say it again, and said he was tired of this shit. I asked him very politely not to curse, and told him that if I heard it again he would be asked to leave. [Ed: in a sincere but perhaps slightly misguided attempt to de-escalate, the LG did not mention that they had to threaten to call 911 to get Mr. S to shut up]

19:00 Mr. L kept propping the gate open to let 2-3 families in. Then he tried to bring in a friend. We told him that his guest can wait until after 8pm to come in because they didn’t come in with him. Mr. L said that there isn’t such rule and we showed him the paper copy. Before leaving he said that we were racist and would have our jobs.

19:20 Ms. C wanted to investigate what was going on and told Mr. L and his family that we make up our own rules and that never happened last year.


Did I mention that the LGs are Mexican-American? (Mr. L above is Asian. Which still leaves me confused).

I went to talk to the LGs the next morning and almost broke down into tears - what do you say when your neighbors make you ashamed and appalled?

I wrote a letter to the other members of the Board, stating that I wanted to cut pool access for Mr. S, Mr. L, and a couple of others, including the guy who made the outrageous racial slur directed at a LG (mentioned elsewhere). The response: "I am not in favor of revoking pool access and fines just yet. Can we please start off with courtesy letters?" This is from an Indian guy who thinks *I'm* a racist. Later I find out he's been conspiring with another Board member on "what to do about Bill?" I'm kinda insulted by this. I know that there have been people on FB who have been complaining about me, intimating that I'm a racist{1} or worse. But I thought that my fellow Board members had some appreciation of the reality of the situation. I've been debating sharing some of the FB conversation here; I know I sound like a loon, but it's almost like a meme virus that spreads crazy. I don't want to do that to you guys.

As always, thank you for listening.

Bill

{1} I'm getting very very sick of the charges of racism that have been flying about.

HOA Board ex-President
Austin, Texas USA

“You can’t put too much water in a nuclear reactor”
MarkM19 (Texas)
Posts: 1,459
Posted:
Bill,
I have 2 suggestions for you regarding your recent post.

1) I would recommend to the board that the people you mentioned have their access restricted until they meet with the board to discuss the behavior that caused this action.

2) I would request that the board member who was speaking to the owner about you possibly being a racist be tasked with doing your job for a few weeks until he gets called a racist and see how he likes it.

3) Once again is it You that is making up the Pool Rules or the board? I would fire anyone who mentions a single board members name when mentioning the board. Your board voted for the rules and are a team enforcing them. The only language that is allowed is "The Board" period.

In my Ca. HOA I had a lame guard that would call me while the owner was arguing with him because he had no idea how to handle people and always needed help. SO I became the bad guy when in fact I was just the guy that he called. This person was not the right person for the job and was let go quickly.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BillD16 on 06/17/2023 6:49 AM

I wrote a letter to the other members of the Board, stating that I wanted to cut pool access for Mr. S, Mr. L, and a couple of others, including the guy who made the outrageous racial slur directed at a LG (mentioned elsewhere). The response: "I am not in favor of revoking pool access and fines just yet. Can we please start off with courtesy letters?" This is from an Indian guy who thinks *I'm* a racist. Later I find out he's been conspiring with another Board member on "what to do about Bill?" I'm kinda insulted by this.
.
.
.
{1} I'm getting very very sick of the charges of racism that have been flying about.
It sounds like you are in the minority here. Also you are stuck with having conversations trying to explain your position about, for one, owners addressing LGs with racial slurs. Worse, I am betting your conversations will not have an effect.

Over some 30+ years, I think I have become more seasoned on certain Fair Housing and employment discrimination issues than the average Joe and Jane. If I were on this board, then at the next open board meeting and per the agenda, I would try to sit there, with no expectations from my fellow directors and without emotion to the extent I was capable. I would try to calmly explain that federal law prohibits an environment that is hostile on the basis of race. Then I would motion for this to be turned over to the HOA attorney for advice on whether and how to address conduct like this from owners. I would ask that my motion be put in the minutes.

I would be braced for all manner of response from directors and owners. I would do my best to dryly and calmly answer questions. I would try to ignore personal attacks and stick with addressing the issue.

I would not be optimistic. Down the road I would expect things to escalate.

The language of Texans(?):

"Where'd you get that pistol?"

"At the gettin' place."


-- All the Pretty Horses and No Country for Old Men, by Cormac McCarthy, d. June 13, 2023
BillD16 (Texas)
Posts: 973
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkM19 on 06/17/2023 7:09 AM
Bill,
I have 2 suggestions for you regarding your recent post.

1) I would recommend to the board that the people you mentioned have their access restricted until they meet with the board to discuss the behavior that caused this action.

2) I would request that the board member who was speaking to the owner about you possibly being a racist be tasked with doing your job for a few weeks until he gets called a racist and see how he likes it.

3) Once again is it You that is making up the Pool Rules or the board? I would fire anyone who mentions a single board members name when mentioning the board. Your board voted for the rules and are a team enforcing them. The only language that is allowed is "The Board" period.

In my Ca. HOA I had a lame guard that would call me while the owner was arguing with him because he had no idea how to handle people and always needed help. SO I became the bad guy when in fact I was just the guy that he called. This person was not the right person for the job and was let go quickly.

Thanks Mark! Fun to think about - alas, I am discovering that my Board doesn't have the spine I thought it had.

#2: that Board member "doesn't have the time" to do anything. He's an Idea Man, see? He's Big Picture - he doesn't do the small stuff, see? He's all about out-of-the-box thinking, and seeing The Big Picture. He lets other people deal with implementation and execution because, see? Big Picture. He's an Idea Man. He's also kind of an idiot.

#3 doesn't have a simple answer: we have a written, out of date set of pool rules that dates from 2014 (this is the set that I want to replace with a new, blessed by paid legal counsel version), plus we have the pool rules that are being enforced by our LGs{1}. I do not know what process birthed the 2014 rules. I'm the Treasurer acting as 'interim pool committee chair' with the blessing of the Board (because if I didn't, the pool wouldn't have opened this year). I keep the Board informed - but I rarely get any response to my updates or questions.

I met briefly with the LGs on their first day, and provided them with 'direction':

1. You're Professional Lifeguards. Give us some Professional Lifeguarding.
2. We have a lot of problems with Tailgaters. Please try to keep tailgaters out.
3. If anyone gives you grief, tell them "we're following the Board's directions". If necessary, direct them to me. We're paying you for Professional Lifeguarding, not to explain or justify your decisions.

This was, I think, well-received. I mean, I know nothing about lifeguarding. If I had handed them a set of rules that I'd written (or worse, that had been written by the Board) - it would be insane at best. At worse, someone would drown and the Board would be held responsible. And from my days in management: there are few things more beautiful than engaging a qualified subject matter expert, pointing them at a task, and just letting them execute on it.

So back to your question: my position is that yes, the Board is responsible for the pool rules. And since my Board is rather dysfunctional, I'm effectively the Board. Another thing I remember from my time in mgmt is the folly of having more than one boss. Here, I am the boss. Or, at least, I try to be. It's not a power thing; the intent is a) to take the heat off of the LGs (don't blame the LGs; blame that bastard Bill!) and b) for me to be the Single Point Of Contact. Because having disgruntled residents calling random Board members to complain about the LGs can only make things worse. And, in fact, despite my efforts, that has already happened (ref my earlier comment about two Board members getting together over "what to do about Bill").

For all of my moaning and groaning: the situation with the pool and the LGs seems to be coming along and improving. We've even got a new LG, a young Black woman who I think will work out very well. That's really my primary objective.

While it is largely a matter of faith, I believe that most of the residents are decent people who are okay, even happy, about the current pool situation. The residents who are giving me (and, alas, the LGs) grief - I try to look on the bright side: this has proved to be a highly productive 'honeypot' and I have better awareness of the shit-stirrers in my community{2}.

The only thing I'm really unhappy about is the "what to do about Bill" thing. I considered one of the people involved to be a trusted friend, someone I treated with respect - and even after talking to them about it, I'm still at a loss as to why they stabbed me in the back like that. The kindest reason that seems to fit the facts is that they 'got high on their own supply' - but I simply don't know. Forgiving and rebuilding a trust relationship with them is going to be extremely difficult - last night I would have said it was flat-out impossible. In this morning's light I feel it's simply impossible. So - it might just be a matter of (lots of) time. But it's like that thing that Nietzsche supposedly said: “I’m not upset that you lied to me, I’m upset that from now on I can’t believe you”.

Bill

{1} https://highsierrapools.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/LG_PM_digital.pdf The American Red Cross Lifeguarding Manual

{2} “Idiots, Dax. Everywhere we are beset by idiots.”

HOA Board ex-President
Austin, Texas USA

“You can’t put too much water in a nuclear reactor”
BillD16 (Texas)
Posts: 973
Posted:
Forgive me, I skipped a critical point re I am the boss: c) I don't want random Board members going to the LGs and telling the LGs what to do. "I'm on the Board, and I'm telling you that you need to make exceptions for Mr. A, Mr. B, and Mr. C, and no more restrictions on pool toy size".

Bill

HOA Board ex-President
Austin, Texas USA

“You can’t put too much water in a nuclear reactor”
MarkM19 (Texas)
Posts: 1,459
Posted:
Bill,
I totally get what you are going through. Trust me I have been in the same position many times over the years. I also get "the Boss" thing. The difference I would make is you are still making the decisions for the board that is not making them so in fact you are "The Board". If they do not like that the other board members are free to do the job.

Very few things make me lose my temper with owners but if anyone ever called me a Racist I would find it hard to not come unglued. This word has become as ugly to me as the N word is to other people. The problem is it is being thrown around way too much and is used inappropriately every day.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here