RichardC29 (Florida)
Posts: 37
Posts: 37
Posted:
I have noticed the deo has become to cozy with the local law firms.the rule of law has been so stretched it means anything the lawyers want.
Look at the rule that states must have a dully notified meeting to decide revitilization has turned into if you sign this consent form you waive your right to the duly notified meeting.so what about the idea of a public meeting as required is now compromised,at public meeting people communicate,it can change votes.
Look at can’t be more restrictive then previous covenants,it’s now what ever the lawyers says.
Look at the appeal process lawyers are granted private telephone contact with deo reps and no appeal paper is need.and a decision is made with out any knowledge of the other party.
For a agency that has no investigative athourity .no judicial authority that stands out big time.
Look at the rule that states must have a dully notified meeting to decide revitilization has turned into if you sign this consent form you waive your right to the duly notified meeting.so what about the idea of a public meeting as required is now compromised,at public meeting people communicate,it can change votes.
Look at can’t be more restrictive then previous covenants,it’s now what ever the lawyers says.
Look at the appeal process lawyers are granted private telephone contact with deo reps and no appeal paper is need.and a decision is made with out any knowledge of the other party.
For a agency that has no investigative athourity .no judicial authority that stands out big time.