MiaR1 (Illinois)
Posts: 46
Posts: 46
Posted:
Here’s the scenario: unit damage from common elements failure. HOA files master claim and agrees to pay for damages but insists on using its maintenance personnel for repairs instead of a licensed contractor. Homeowner has objections to this arrangement because owner would have no recourse for shotty workmanship done in his home, whereas licensed contractor would provide that relief. With letting maintenance personnel do the repairs, owner can run into expensive building code violations when selling his place and would either have to fix the violation at own cost or reduce selling price due to no fault of his own.
Two points for this scenario: (1) if damage had occurred from unit to common element, HOA would’ve demanded from owner nothing short of a licensed contractor for repairs to common elements. Does the owner not have the same right?
(2) as it’s true with car accidents that owner of damaged vehicle can take his car for repair to mechanic of his choosing even if the other party pays, does that concept legally apply to property damage? Why or why not?
Your thoughts and guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Two points for this scenario: (1) if damage had occurred from unit to common element, HOA would’ve demanded from owner nothing short of a licensed contractor for repairs to common elements. Does the owner not have the same right?
(2) as it’s true with car accidents that owner of damaged vehicle can take his car for repair to mechanic of his choosing even if the other party pays, does that concept legally apply to property damage? Why or why not?
Your thoughts and guidance would be greatly appreciated.