Quote:
Posted By DouglasK1 on 06/01/2023 6:15 AM
Posted By PaulO3 on 05/31/2023 1:00 PM
I can't really find anything specific in 720 on this subject in the state of Florida. What would be the proper method of removing a committee member from their position by the board?
The method is to vote (make a motion) at a properly noticed board meeting, with the topic on the agenda.
Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 05/31/2023 3:50 PM
That said you could discuss the matter in executive session, perhaps inviting the committee member.
FS 720 does not appear to allow this. The only exception to open board meetings that I see is this:
Meetings of the board must be open to all members, except for meetings between the board and its attorney with respect to proposed or pending litigation where the contents of the discussion would otherwise be governed by the attorney-client privilege. As far as I can tell, FS720 does not even use the term "executive session".
FS 720 does say personnel issues do not have to be discussed in an open meeting:
Notwithstanding any other law, meetings between the board or a committee and the association’s attorney to discuss proposed or pending litigation or meetings of the board held for the purpose of discussing personnel matters are not required to be open to the members other than directors. We can debate whether this is a personnel issue, but I prefer nodding to the reality that
discussion of the situation may result in potentially defamatory statements being made. It's potentially almost a hearing or trial of the committee member. For open session, the board might need to hear out the committee member if it wants to protect the HOA from litigation. Even then in open session, there are risks.
I advise discussion take place in closed session (because of liability concerns), and the actual vote, in open session. These are sensitive issues. I am not persuaded the owners should be privvy to everything here, on account of competing interests (the committee members right to privacy and not be defamed vs. the owners' stautory rights pertaining to transparency).