💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

CaroleS (Florida)
Posts: 97
Posted:
There are so many smart people in this group. I may not post often but this is a good place to problem solve..
I’m in a 24 year old HOA community. The club covenants say one thing. A master board voted to do something else.
That something else.which is contrary to the club covenants, has held for 20 +. It is my understanding that is
Precedent and it over rides the covenants. I’m in Florida.

Thank you carole
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Under certain circumstances when a covenant has not been enforced for a long time, a court might rule the covenant to be "abandoned" on account of what the courts call "acquiescence" by the board and owners.

For more insights, you would have to describe in more detail what the covenant says and what the master board did.
CaroleS (Florida)
Posts: 97
Posted:
The covenant says that Clubhouse can be used by residents and others.. a hey, master board voted after the turnover that there could be no private use of the clubhouse. It could either be used by a club or the association for a function for everyone..
The clubhouse was pretty much, gutted the price went from 7,000,000 to 14,000,000. they’re not approved by the homeowners a full scale restaurant for tomorrow was built and you can now have private functions and it can be rented out. It is a mess. The property manager had a wedding over the weekend there and there is not a certificate of occupancy. The master board members did not know. I just found the perfect.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
CaroleS, I cannot translate your post into English.
CaroleS (Florida)
Posts: 97
Posted:
The club covenant says that the clubhouse can be used by anyone. In one of the first master board meetings, the board voted there would be no private functions. The only functions could be by clubs or association activities for everyone. The no private functions has held until now.. so if no private functions has held for 20 years, does that override what the covenant says?
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Write the exact words of the covenant, please, on this topic!

But the master association board voted that the clubhouse can be used by "clubs?" Aren't these clubs private? Or are these "clubs" HOA-approved clubs?

Are you saying that without a vote of the Owners, the master assoc. board voted to build a restaurant, etc. ? HOA owners did not vote for this huge expense?
CaroleS (Florida)
Posts: 97
Posted:
leased or licensed to third particsorMembers, exceptw a n dwhen permittedby Club Owner.
4.2. Useby PersonsOthec than Owners andT h a n tEbb Ownerhas the right at any and al times, and from time to time. to make the Club available to individualspersuns, firms or corporations other than Members, as it deems appropriate. Club Owner shall establish the fecs to be p a i d any person using the Club who is not aMembes. The granting of such rights shall not invalidate these Club Covemants,seduce orabate any Owner's obligationsto pay Club Charges pursuant to these Club Covenants, or give any Owne Theright to avoid any ofthe provisions of these covenants

It starts at 4.2

HOA approved clubs vs a wedding or private luncheon

The community voted for a café. The property manager convinced the board to have a full-blown restaurant, including a liquor license. and a full blown kitchen to have functions to offset $7 million increase in cost. that building has not gotten a certificate of occupancy yet. It has been 3+ years. This past Saturday night, a private homeowner together with the property manager had a wedding. The wedding was held on the veranda. The optics of the pictures taken inside the clubhouse are frightening. We use castle management.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Usually the issue of "precedent" vs. the text of the law needs to be settled by a court case. You can't assume one way or the other. Because of this, I think you'll need to consult with a lawyer.

It appears that this community *may* allow use of their facilities by non-members (ie. the general public), which introduces some complications that many HOAs don't deal with.

Beyond that I don't have much of a clue as to what's happening here. But .. . if the precedent here was to make the facilities open to the general public and the CC&Rs actually say that they are open to homeowners for their clubs and other private gatherings, I can see why the current board would want to shut that down hard. ADA issues, inadequate liability insurance, and the like are significant risks to the HOA. If this happened the other way around, the current board needs to stop and talk to the HOA attorney and insurer (if they haven't done so already) before they get the HOA into real trouble.

Interesting topic... wish I knew what was going on. :-)

CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CaroleS on 04/12/2023 6:00 PM
The club covenant says that the clubhouse can be used by anyone. In one of the first master board meetings, the board voted there would be no private functions. The only functions could be by clubs or association activities for everyone. The no private functions has held until now.. so if no private functions has held for 20 years, does that override what the covenant says?

Maybe... but it will depend on the exact language of the CC&Rs and the exact meaning of "private functions". If the CC&Rs truly say "anyone" - meaning the general public - and the board just hadn't allowed the general public to use them up to now but they've decided that they were overly restrictive in the past, I doubt that will override the covenant. Generally adding a new restriction requires homeowner approval.

And that would be an unusual situation since most HOA facilities are not open to the general public, for very good reasons.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CaroleS on 04/12/2023 6:22 PM

4.2. Useby PersonsOthec than Owners andT h a n tEbb Ownerhas the right at any and al times, and from time to time. to make the Club available to individualspersuns, firms or corporations other than Members, as it deems appropriate. Club Owner shall establish the fecs
This is not a restriction on the use of an owner's individual lot. The rules for abandoned covenants are not going to apply.

Do the covenants define who the "Club Owner" is?

So far my opinion is that the covenants say the board has the right to set rules either (1) allowing private use; or (2) prohibiting private use. This rule can vary depending on the board. It does not matter how long things have been done here.

If the owners do not like what the board does, the owners have two options: either (1) change the makeup of the board; or (2) vote to amend the covenants so that the board's hands are tied on this issue.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CaroleS on 04/12/2023 6:22 PM
... snip ...

The community voted for a café. The property manager convinced the board to have a full-blown restaurant, including a liquor license. and a full blown kitchen to have functions to offset $7 million increase in cost. that building has not gotten a certificate of occupancy yet. It has been 3+ years. This past Saturday night, a private homeowner together with the property manager had a wedding. The wedding was held on the veranda. The optics of the pictures taken inside the clubhouse are frightening. We use castle management.

Yipes.

If I were your insurer or your association attorney, I'd be having a "come to Jesus" meeting with the board about the nature and size of the risks the HOA is taking, along with a recommendation to find a new manager.

The more I think about it, the more messed up it seems. You decided you need a bigger facility to accommodate the bigger functions that you need to pay for the bigger facility...? My head is spinning.

Talk to a lawyer about your options, but it sounds like this community is off the rails and I'm not sure how much a single homeowner can do to change things other than through expensive and time-consuming litigation.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 04/13/2023 6:38 AM
.. snip ...

So far my opinion is that the covenants say the board has the right to set rules either (1) allowing private use; or (2) prohibiting private use. This rule can vary depending on the board. It does not matter how long things have been done here.

... snip ...


Does anyone else think this is really weird? (I'm assuming in this case "private use" means "open to the public", since that appears to be what's happening.)

Open to the public means the facility must be ADA compliant. And insuring a public facility is a different matter from insuring a community club house where homeowners are allowed to host private parties, especially if a liquor license is involved.

Given the potential significant differences, I think it's odd that it would be left up to the board's discretion. (I also think we don't have the full story here.)

ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
The covenant the OP attempted to quote speaks of use by "other than members." It also indicates selective use by "other than members." To me this particular part of the covenant is not saying that the clubhouse is open to the public, per se. It's saying to me that the HOA can rent out the clubhouse //as it sees fit//. But it does not //have// to rent out the club to any and all who ask to use it.

I do not know if this is up to the board's discretion. It's only my opinion that it is, based on the information presented so far. This is because it seems owners rarely have express, discretionary powers that are specific to common area usage. Instead the owners have the power to amend.

I think the use of the clubhouse as a cafe is largely a separate issue. It's also a minefield of other problems.

As is common, the OP can only get an introduction of how to talk about this with an attorney. Said attorney will look over every word and comma of the covenants. This forum does not have this benefit.
LoriM15 (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
It would be interesting to get the whole story on this. The word "club" sticks out for me. Most likely this is a golf community. It is common here in Florida to have a golf club as part of the community. Many require homeowners to be "equity" members of the club, which means that even if you don't golf you still have to pay to maintain all the golf communities. You may have to pay an equity membership to buy in to the community.

Sometimes the club facilities are for members only, but it's expensive. So they open up the facilities to outsiders. One community near me offers a Sunday brunch that is open to the public. Other times they may have a "19th hole" that offers light meals and snacks that is also open to anyone who pays the fee to golf on the course. And many function like country clubs.

One large community in my area decided to upgrade their clubhouse and add more entertaining area including upgrading the restaurant. They also added more fitness space. This result in each homeowner being responsible for a huge special assessment (I can't remember how much, but I believe it was 10's of thousands of dollars).

The downside of an equity membership community is the cost of these things. However, the upside is that you know, unless the community goes bankrupt, that the amenities will be there. In communities where the club is separate and you have to pay to be a member, you run the risk of the club closing down or being sold off along with the golf course. That happens a lot.

Golf clubs are hugely expensive. The OP's point that the PM talked them into doing a restaurant is really that they ran the numbers and tried to find a way that it made financial sense to keep the facilities open. Renting out facilities for weddings and special events is one way to add revenue.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
A BOD should have control over what purpose the club being rented for. Many avoid political, social, etc. issues when it come to renting.
BarbaraK (Florida)
Posts: 36
Posted:
In Florida you may amend the covenants but you cannot contradict them. They cannot just vote to change anything without amending them first.
CaroleS (Florida)
Posts: 97
Posted:
This has been an exhausting, five or six days. We are a 55+ community. Lennar and Centex were the builders. The community is 23 years old. The documents have never been changed. They date back to December 1999. As is normal the documents are in favor of the developer. Over the years, I have tried to get them changed. The master board was never interested in doing it. Our clubhouse is 28,000 ft.² and it needed to be updated. All of the communities around us have very upscale facilities, including a café. The clubhouse was not included in the price of the home the community had to buy the clubhouse at closing. It was difficult to get a mortgage. Now comes the time to upgrade and refurbish the clubhouse. The first thing that happened was the loan had to be retired so every house was assessed $3400. An amendment to the documents was passed to upgrade the clubhouse as a fitness center and include a café. The maximum estimated cost was supposed to be around $7 million. The property manager, from Castle management, first change the logo. Send change the front of the community to work with the logo. No homeowner knew anything about this. I have been told but I do not know firsthand that the president of the board has allowed the property manager, a lot of leeway, and what he does, somehow along the way and no one can get a straight answer the property manager convinced the board to have a full-service restaurant and bar and kitchen. At the same time the costs are now at $14 million and no one can get a straight answer on where the money has gone and Marie have tried. This is the fourth season that we have had no clubhouse Covid did not help. The building has yet to have a certificate of occupancy. I don’t know all the details but last Saturday night a wedding was held at the clubhouse outside with access inside. The pictures are very bad. The club covenants 4.2 which I have posted above allow the board pretty much free rain and who uses the clubhouse. My problem with that is that when turnover happened the first or second board passed a resolution or a rule that there will be no private functions only club functions and associated functions, and that rule has held for 20+ years. I think a quart would say that the rule held for so long that the original rule is negated, but I don’t know that for a fact. There are 1060 homes most owners want to be left alone home prices skyrocketed as did everything else. New buyers were promised a new facility and they have yet to see it and some of them are very annoyed. The property manager was at the wedding in a tuxedo this past Saturday night, my feeling is that the property management company needs to remove this manager and get this community, working again fix the clubhouse and let people begin to enjoy the facility. The board who now has three new members is trying, but it is not very cohesive. How many hours have gone out on next-door and aired our dirty laundry to the world because they do not know how to use the app I run a private Facebook group. People are trying to stay focused on the issues that were just getting very difficult, the last time there was a major problem 10+ years ago I knew how to resolve it but I don’t have a clue what to do but it’s not good I hope I have explained this well enough I really am looking for suggestions and someone said it’s more than one person and I think I can get a group of people, but what do we do?
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
CaroleS, I am aware of HOAs set up as you describe and as LoriM noted as well. These of course tend to be higher-end HOAs with higher income residents. I opine that your type of HOA is more complicated than most and does not see as much discussion here. I think this is probably due to such HOAs paying a good deal of money to management to oversee the place. Also those living there having enough money to not care much about wastage.

You have the numbers to replace the board or you do not. Once the board is replaced, it has the expertise to seek answers to questions and run the place, or it does not.

One of the biggest impediments right now is getting command of the facts. Your HOA is so complicated (especially if it has been somehow running a restaurant from this clubhouse) that this will be hard.
LoriM15 (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
To the OP: this situation did not suddenly happen if your clubhouse has been shut down for four years. You are not presenting the whole story, which I understand because it's probably really complicated. You said you don't know where the money went. Have you looked at the budgets for the last four years? In Florida, the homeowner can request to view any of the official records of the association - so that would include meeting minutes and budgets. There must have been discussions and votes documented in the minutes. The management company didn't suddenly "convince" the board to do anything - and the board had to have voted on it. Plus the budget will tell you where your special assessments and monthly dues are going.

In order to convince your neighbors that the board has done something wrong or that they have wasted money and need to be replaced, you need to get your facts in place. Get copies and review the documents, the invoices, the minutes.

The story about the property manager hosting a party in a tuxedo doesn't sound great. Have you asked the property manager what exactly happened? Did you find out from the board if they knew about the party or approved it?

I understand your frustration with this project that seems to have gone off the rails for the last four years. But you clearly don't have all the facts and you can't really do anything about it without all the information.
CaroleS (Florida)
Posts: 97
Posted:
Of course, you are correct about everything you have suggested. Sadly homeowners don’t want to affect change. I am trying to see if I can put a small group together who are willing to do the work because it is a lot. I am not having much success the app next store is loaded With horribly negative comments about my community. Out of 1060 homes I am one of the few who is willing to try to put us back together. I do not know if it will happen.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here