A service of:
Community123.com
Professional websites for HOAs & condos, since 2004
🎁 1st year FREE for HOATalk members! →
Return to Topics List

Is it acceptable for someone to 2nd their own motion using a proxy in a special meeting or Annual Group meeting

Started by TedV20 replies • 524 views

💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

TedV (Texas)
Posts: 2
Posted:
This is somewhat of a Robert's Rules of Order question, though I have not been able to find anything about proxies in Robert's rules research that I have done. If a homeowner attends a Special Meeting or an Annual Group Meeting, and this homeowner also has the proxy for a second homeowner, can he make a motion and second his own motion using his proxy for the second homeowner? I would appreciate any insight you all have to offer! I am in Texas.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Welcome to the forum, TedV.

This would be a "Special Meeting of the Members" (owners), right,? What is an "annual group meeting?" Is it also called the "Annual Meeting of Members," when board elections are usually held?

I don't know much about proxies, but so far as I do know, they may be used only to vote, i.e., as a "ballot." They may not be used to make or second motions. Many on this site, though, ARE familiar with proxies, so can help. This, it seems to me isn't a Texas thing.
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
There can be two types of proxies, one directed, and the other undirected.

A directed proxy will have specific instructions on how the proxy holder must vote. An undirected proxy gives the proxy holder total leeway on how the proxy holder can vote. They especially have the same power as the proxy giver would have at a meeting.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Have you read your documents to see what they say about proxies? They may dictate how proxies are to be used. You should also look at the proxy itself to see what it authorizes the representative to do, it's one thing to cast a vote on behalf of whoever gave the proxy, but using it as you described doesn't sound appropriate.

I assume you've checked the Robert's rules of order website, but if this isn't addressed, you might find the answer from a certified parliamentarian. There's a national association which I think has a database of its members. You may be able to check if there's someone in your area.

Im not an expert in parliamentary procedures, but I suspect this homeowner is trying an end run around everyone else . I'd make him prove this is authorized - most people have heard if Robert's rules of order but there are other types out there. If your community only uses Robert's rules and it doesn't specifically allow this, tell that homeowner to sit down.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
While this is not from Texas, it will help clear the air, as Robert's Rules of Order does travel across state lines.

https://lawfirmcarolinas.com/blog/proxies-and-proxy-voting-at-membership-or-board-meetings/
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
So....Max, who has experience with proxies, is saying the you can use the proxy to second the motion. Max wrote: "They (the proxy) especially have the same power as the proxy giver would have at a meeting." That's new to me, but just about everything to do with proxies is new to me. Interesting.
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/31/2023 5:08 PM
So....Max, who has experience with proxies, is saying the you can use the proxy to second the motion. Max wrote: "They (the proxy) especially have the same power as the proxy giver would have at a meeting." That's new to me, but just about everything to do with proxies is new to me. Interesting.

I am not saying it, the article does. Did YOU even read it, or were you just too pretty?
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
"Pretty?"
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/31/2023 7:02 PM
"Pretty?"

That was sure a misstatement of the facts. It was supposed to read "busy".
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/31/2023 7:02 PM
"Pretty?"

That was sure a misstatement of the facts. It was supposed to read "busy".
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I never say I'm too "busy".[sic] I usually say I'm "too slow." In this case, since my HOA doesn't use proxies and since those who're experienced will reply, I'm just not interested in reading the citation. I'm sure it's good one and others will learn from it.

Looks like the question for TedV is: what kind of proxy does he have?
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/31/2023 7:27 PM
I never say I'm too "busy".[sic] I usually say I'm "too slow." In this case, since my HOA doesn't use proxies and since those who're experienced will reply, I'm just not interested in reading the citation. I'm sure it's good one and others will learn from it.

Looks like the question for TedV is: what kind of proxy does he have?

Then why comment in the first place????
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I like to show interest in new posters and, in this case, thought it'd be good idea if he'd tell us exactly what kind of meeting he's referring to.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TedV on 03/31/2023 3:53 PM
This is somewhat of a Robert's Rules of Order question, though I have not been able to find anything about proxies in Robert's rules research that I have done. If a homeowner attends a Special Meeting or an Annual Group Meeting, and this homeowner also has the proxy for a second homeowner, can he make a motion and second his own motion using his proxy for the second homeowner?
Short answer: No. For the annual meeting, the only special power a proxy holder has is to //vote// on behalf of the absent owner. A proxy holder may not make, nor second, motions on behalf of the absent owner.

Long answer:
The many editions of Roberts Rules make clear that their guidance is designed mostly (by far) for "deliberative assemblies," where there is no board but instead, all decisions are made by all members of the organization, en masse. In a deliberative assembly (which a HOA or condo is //not//), one member is equal to another. Also in deliberative assemblies, absentee voting (including voting by proxy) is not allowed.

By contrast and per the law, for shareholder corporations such as condominiums and HOAs, the owners have a few specific powers, as given in the bylaws and state law. A board of directors does the bulk of the decision-making.

The result is that Robert's Rules lacks detailed direction on the use of proxies. Instead, for questions like TedV's, one must turn to the bylaws and statutes. (Note that Robert's Rules concedes that the bylaws and statutes trump Robert's Rules anytime there is a conflict with Robert's Rules or Robert's Rules fails to address a certain topic.)

One can read Texas statutes BO 22, TPC 209, TPC 81 and TPC 82 and see that what they are silent on the subject of motions. They do speak time and again of how the authority a proxy bequeaths to the proxy holder is to vote.

No authority exists in the statutes to allow someone to either make a motion on behalf of an absentee owner, or to second a motion. It would be strange for the original, unamended bylaws to provide such authority. Generally speaking, to add this authority would require an amendment to the bylaws.

TedV, I also caution you that the only motions that should be happening at the annual meeting are motions that have been duly noticed to all owners, pursuant to the bylaws and state laws' requirements for notice.

TedV (Texas)
Posts: 2
Posted:
Hi All! Thank you for all your replies. I especially found ElleN's reply insightful because she references Texas Law and speaks to the ways that Robert's Rules is limited on proxies. I have a small HOA and Condominium management company in Dallas. I am afraid that like a lot of HOA's, we use a very simple proxy form and obviously I need to educate the boards and communities that I work with about directed proxies, etc.
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Going to disagree with Augustin and this is based on personal, first-hand experience.

Outside of voting, one of the other areas mentioned in the Bylaws is the adjournment of meetings, specifically the Annual Meeting or Special Meeting of the Members when a quorum hasn't been reached. It is the Members, not the Board, that will make the motion, second and vote to adjourn the meeting(s) to a later date, and depending on the Bylaws, to a reduced quorum, generally, only half of the initial quorum, say 50%. of the members. The Bylaws will say Those present, either in person or by proxy may vote to adjourn the meeting. Just because something is silent doesn't mean they can't. Show me something that says they can't make a motion. Based on Bylaws and Corporation codes across the country, some form of parliamentary procedures must be used for the types of meetings described.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
It's great to educate yourself and 69u should, but it's not your job to educate the board on how it's supposed to use proxies, how to run tge meeting or anything else related to how the community is to be run. This board should have done what you did - research Robert's rules of order and/or review tge bylaws with the association attorney.

There are several conversations on this website about property managers who jump into meeting controversies and it usually doesn't end well. I appreciate you're trying to be helpful, but you don't want to lose clients because you advised something that went sideways and that something wasn't part of your contract with the association. If you have to remind the board (politely but firmly) what your duties per your contract, do it. If they don't believe it, they're welcome to read the contract, which they should have already done.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
For those to lazy to follow the link, the lawyer in NC said:

General proxy: The holder of the proxy has discretion to do whatever he or she wishes at the meeting and can speak, make motions, second motions, and vote on all issues

Limited proxy: The holder of the proxy can only vote on certain issues at the meeting

Directed proxy: The holder of the proxy can only vote as directed

Limited directed proxy: The holder of the proxy can only vote on certain issues as directed

Quorum proxy: The proxy only counts for purposes of obtaining a quorum and nothing else
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
The bylaws are silent on many things. But where the bylaws are silent on subject xyz, powers concerning xyz may not be invented. Example: The bylaws are silent about notarization of proxies. Can a board lawfully require notarization of proxy forms? No.

Assuming proper notice was given on a motion, those who hold a proxy on behalf of another can vote on anything. This is consistent with what bylaws and statutes say about what proxy holders can do.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 04/01/2023 9:58 AM
For those to lazy to follow the link, the lawyer in NC said:

General proxy: The holder of the proxy has discretion to do whatever he or she wishes at the meeting and can speak, make motions, second motions, and vote on all issues
Noted. A motion to adjourn to a later time is the only motion of which I can think that may legitimately arise without the meeting's notice referring to it. But: If a single owner, speaking for herself and on behalf of a second person for whom she is proxy, both makes the motion and seconds it, so what? There still has to be a discussion and then a vote. It's not like this one person can force anything a majority at the meeting do not want.

Perhaps the bigger problem here is that motions are being made willy-nilly at the AGM, and they are not lawful motions to begin with? This would be due to the motion either not having been properly noticed to all owners or because the motion proposes powers that the bylaws do not give to owners in the first place.
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 04/01/2023 4:33 PM
Posted By JohnC46 on 04/01/2023 9:58 AM
For those to lazy to follow the link, the lawyer in NC said:

General proxy: The holder of the proxy has discretion to do whatever he or she wishes at the meeting and can speak, make motions, second motions, and vote on all issues
Noted. A motion to adjourn to a later time is the only motion of which I can think that may legitimately arise without the meeting's notice referring to it. But: If a single owner, speaking for herself and on behalf of a second person for whom she is proxy, both makes the motion and seconds it, so what? There still has to be a discussion and then a vote. It's not like this one person can force anything a majority at the meeting do not want.

Perhaps the bigger problem here is that motions are being made willy-nilly at the AGM, and they are not lawful motions to begin with? This would be due to the motion either not having been properly noticed to all owners or because the motion proposes powers that the bylaws do not give to owners in the first place.

Over the course of 14-plus years, I have conducted or been part of hundreds of Annual Meetings. The only motions I have EVER seen is approving the previous year's minutes, approving IRS Ruling 70-604, and motion to adjourn.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here