💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MichaelT21 (Arkansas)
Posts: 200
Posted:
We seem to have an amazing amount of Board turnover. Something about 50% a year.

I've found that the less that I ask of other to do, the more likely they will stay. They seem to stay as long as they don't have to do anything. Once I press them to do work, they seem to depart at a higher rate.

Is this typical?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Yes.

Former HOA President
JohnT38 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,631
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MichaelT21 on 02/27/2023 2:00 PM
We seem to have an amazing amount of Board turnover. Something about 50% a year.

I've found that the less that I ask of other to do, the more likely they will stay. They seem to stay as long as they don't have to do anything. Once I press them to do work, they seem to depart at a higher rate.

Is this typical?

I don't think it's unusual to have a steady turnover rate but I never experienced 50% during any of the three years I was on the Board. I will say that if your leadership skills are weak this may be part of the problem. Do you have the ability to educate other Board members on why the tasks you want done are important and how they will impact the HOA? Do you have the communication skills needed to sell an idea that you are pitching? Do people back way from responding because they don't want to be micro managed and feel uncomfortable working with you?

Only you can answer these questions honestly but my first reaction is 50% is way too high. At this rate you will never get a full Board up to speed at the same time because half the Board is going through a steep learning curve which impacts productivity.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
In my eight years serving on the board, we only had 2 people leave before elections.

One moved. One wouldn't read any emails until the meeting night and simply couldn't keep up with what was going on.

SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
What Melissa and John said. We keep telling you your micromanaging will blow up in your face sooner or later.

That being said, I think some people get overwhelmed at the decisions they have to make. You may have to approve an assessment increase no one will like, decide whether to foreclose on someone's home that will wreck their credit for a few minutes, decide which of the five bad roofs you have will have to be replaced first and hope the remaining four will hold up a little while longer, and on and on.

And yes, actually working as opposed to leaving the decisions to one or two people or the property manager is so much easier because you don't want to read anything, are afraid of looking ignorant by asking questions, or sit there while the neighbors drone on and on about a decision you made two months ago and provided all the pros and cons of that decision, explaining two or three tines why the board decided what it did, but clearly they aren't listening or refuse to

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
14 years on our Board of (in reality) 6. 1 director left in a snit. 1, a realtor, left imo due to to not getting her way, and no new clients. 1 resigned after her 3 evil co-directors were defeated in an election. 2 moved. 1, just elected in Nov. is resigned after 4-1/2, 3 as prez, years due to burn-out. He only sought reelection because some of us talked him into it to finish a big project and to help "train"our new PM.

In general, I don't recall any president individually asking any directors to do specific tasks or work. A director might bring up something that needs to be one, it's discussed and a director volunteers to help....or not. We do have a full-time onsite PM who's directed to do a lot of work by the Board. Sometimes an appropriate director is assigned by THE BOARD to stay on top of a PM assignment.

As a org. exec way back in the 1910s learned, "the turnover," causes great inefficiencies and productivity losses as JohnT points out.

I also think MichelT forgets that Boards govern HOAs, not presidents. In addition it's been suggested to MichaelT many times that his HOA of 270+ homes and many parks, needs a PM more than for a few hours a week.

MarkM19 (Texas)
Posts: 1,459
Posted:
MichaelT21,
I am sure you are thinking what is wrong with all these people leaving. The first place to look is not on hoatalk.com it is the mirror.

Not sure if anyone has ever asked in your hundreds of earlier posts but what do you do for a living?
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
MichaelT may have mentioned this, but, even if not, I'd guess some kind of an engineer.
MichaelS56 (Minnesota)
Posts: 859
Posted:
When we have openings on our board, anyone who expresses interest, we will spend some time answering their questions and informing them what it is like to be on the Board. Our Board members expect to do some work and be the lead contact to some of the projects that the association will get involved with.
ND (PA)
Posts: 792
Posted:
Turnover is typical, but your amount seems greater than most.
Suggest referencing your hundred or so other posts here that contain significant info, suggestions, and feedback for some things to consider implementing that might help your situation.
MichaelT21 (Arkansas)
Posts: 200
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkM19 on 02/27/2023 6:02 PM
MichaelT21,
I am sure you are thinking what is wrong with all these people leaving. The first place to look is not on hoatalk.com it is the mirror.


One person left because he got divorced and moved out the community.

Another person left because they sold their house and moved to a different town.

A third person left because their employer moved them to California.

A fourth person left because he stopped doing meeting meeting minutes. When I privately discussed it with him, he told me he was going to quit because his father's health was poor and he needed to focus on helping his dad (his dad since has passed on)

A fifth person left claiming it was me, but in reality, this person had a minority voice and kept getting outvoted, and got frustrated.

A sixth person left because they had been on the board for many years and decided it was time to transition off. They later regretted the decision, but that was their decision to make at the time.

A seventh person left because they grew tired of Board service, and later sold their house and moved out of the neighborhood.

So no, generally it was not because of me as to why they left.
JohnT38 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,631
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MichaelT21 on 02/28/2023 8:47 AM
Posted By MarkM19 on 02/27/2023 6:02 PM
MichaelT21,
I am sure you are thinking what is wrong with all these people leaving. The first place to look is not on hoatalk.com it is the mirror.



One person left because he got divorced and moved out the community.

Another person left because they sold their house and moved to a different town.

A third person left because their employer moved them to California.

A fourth person left because he stopped doing meeting meeting minutes. When I privately discussed it with him, he told me he was going to quit because his father's health was poor and he needed to focus on helping his dad (his dad since has passed on)

A fifth person left claiming it was me, but in reality, this person had a minority voice and kept getting outvoted, and got frustrated.

A sixth person left because they had been on the board for many years and decided it was time to transition off. They later regretted the decision, but that was their decision to make at the time.

A seventh person left because they grew tired of Board service, and later sold their house and moved out of the neighborhood.

So no, generally it was not because of me as to why they left.

Yes it is. That's why you originally stated, "I've found that the less that I ask of other to do, the more likely they will stay. They seem to stay as long as they don't have to do anything. Once I press them to do work, they seem to depart at a higher rate."

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
We have a BOD of five elected on staggered terms to serve two year. 3 one year and 2 the next. That said the Pres and myself (VP) have been on the BOD for 4 years. We keep running and getting elected.
BillD16 (Texas)
Posts: 972
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MichaelT21 on 02/27/2023 2:00 PM
We seem to have an amazing amount of Board turnover. Something about 50% a year.

I've found that the less that I ask of other to do, the more likely they will stay. They seem to stay as long as they don't have to do anything. Once I press them to do work, they seem to depart at a higher rate.

Is this typical?

I think it's important to be fair{1}. None of us are perfect, and Michael isn't shy about exposing his weaknesses in this space. But I rather doubt his Board's attrition rate is entirely his fault. I haven't been doing this HOA/BOD thing for as long as many of you, but - just the other evening, a new BOD member jumped in with "We should do this! And we should do that! And ..." on and on and on. I turned it around: "Those are some excellent ideas! Can you take care of implementing them within the next week?" and (of course) they backed down and soon it was all forgotten. It's not the first time I've seen this kind of thing.

I'm not trying to pick on the new BOD member person; I'm simply attempting to use them as an example of how many people - 50% might be a *low* figure - really have no idea what serving on a HOA BOD is like, and once they discover there's actual effort involved in the job, they greatly regret the altruistic impulse that led them to seek the position in the first place. Indeed, one of my pet peeves is a Board member who believes their "contribution" is simply showing up and 'making their feelings known'. Unsurprisingly, many of these people will step down at the first opportunity. And sometimes it's legit: we had a BOD member step down because they had their first child. Admittedly, I couldn't *stand* this person and was happy to see them leave. But I'd advise *any* new parent to ditch the BOD and hang out with their new family. Michael provides a list of reasons why people have stepped down, and many of them are just this kind of personal issue. Swimming pool repairs, or diaper duty?{3} Anyone who doesn't find it an easy choice is probably a war criminal.

And while I'd expect very few people are happy that (ex) a parent is at death's door, they're also not above taking advantage of the situation to bail out of a gig they aren't liking overly much. And who wants to work with someone who's already got too much crap going on, anyway? So: goodbye, and Godspeed!

Admittedly, people *do* quit Boards over personal conflicts. There are ex-BOD members in my very own neighborhood who will tell you they left because of me. I know it's difficult to believe (*chuckle*). And I guess I'm supposed to be ashamed of it. But I'm not. If anything, I think that anyone who is running for their BOD to institute Change should take heart knowing that "HOA Board member" is not a position that most people are willing to fight for{4}.

Finally: MHO is that retired persons (such as myself) are often excellent BOD members. For instance: they tend to have more experience and free time. Maybe less free time than they think they have. But - speaking for myself and I think many others - when a person retires, they are in some sense losing their sense of identity. When I retired, I was no longer "Bill the computer genius who worked for {a large blue company}". For better or for worse, "HOA Board member" is a part of who I am now{5}, and I like to think it helps me do a better job of it. I mean, who wants "really awful HOA Board member" as part of their integral sense of self?

Bill

{1} This drives certain friends and even spouses of mine crazy, because when the news reports that {political figure} has acted up, my first thought is: Is that what *really* happened? Because - I hope this doesn't ruin anyone's day - American journalism these days isn't so good. It's not that I'm a fan of {political figure}{2} - it's just that I think it's important that accusations against someone need to be fair and accurate. If the news begins crapping all over someone for imaginary wrong-doings, it makes it *much more difficult* to hold that person accountable for their *real* offenses. In the same way: it's not *always* Michael's fault.

{2} I believe that my mom - not the most politically astute person - nonetheless was largely correct about politicians: "they're *all* crooks!"

{3} An observation based on my own adventures in child-rearing: my kids' poop doesn't stink. *Other* people's kids' poop is vile.

{4} I'm guessing it's very different in National or World politics, where there are real lives and jobs and $$$ on the line. If I seem a bit too proud of myself, I'll assure you that I have no illusions about functioning in a Real Political Office: I'd sink like a stone. Only faster.

{5} Realizing that this gig won't last forever, I've taken the precaution of becoming other things, too.

HOA Board ex-President
Austin, Texas USA

“You can’t put too much water in a nuclear reactor”

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here