💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DeborahM8 (California)
Posts: 4
Posted:
There are some units in my condo that have garage storage constructed over garage fire sprinklers. The HOA board is saying these owners should be "grandfathered in" and retain their storage covering the sprinklers, but new construction has to leave the sprinklers explosed. I'm opposed to having separate rules for owners in the same buildiing.

I've asked the HOA management association to determine whether the fire sprinklers are legally required and whether the older garage storage units need to be removed to be in legal compliance. I have not heard an answer back. What is legally required in Los Angeles, CA?
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Interesting. Tell the manager and board you saw this:

https://up.codes/s/fire-sprinklers-attached-garages-and-carports-with-habitable-space-above

Add that you are concerned about violations of the law and whether the condo association insurer knows about the monkeying with already installed sprinkler systems.

If I heard about "grandfathering" an action that made a fire safety system non-functional, I would be asking a lot of questions. If I did not get answers, I would think about moving (because I do not want to serve on a board or argue with the incompetence).
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 4,420
Posted:
Also speak with the city Land Use department about this and see if they have anything intelligent to say. Like, "Yes, ma'am, we do issue citations for violations of the fire code. "
DeborahM8 (California)
Posts: 4
Posted:
I will ask these questions of the HOA property management company. Thanks,
JohnT38 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,631
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DeborahM8 on 02/13/2023 2:44 PM
There are some units in my condo that have garage storage constructed over garage fire sprinklers. The HOA board is saying these owners should be "grandfathered in" and retain their storage covering the sprinklers, but new construction has to leave the sprinklers explosed. I'm opposed to having separate rules for owners in the same buildiing.

I've asked the HOA management association to determine whether the fire sprinklers are legally required and whether the older garage storage units need to be removed to be in legal compliance. I have not heard an answer back. What is legally required in Los Angeles, CA?

Report it to the local Fire Marshall or Fire Department. Let them deal with it. This is ridiculous.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Do NOT have anything to do with "grandfathering in" such a dangerous problem. We're a condo building and here's the recent memo from our manager:" he annual/yearly inspections are a mandatory requirement by the State Fire Marshall as noted in NFPA 25, California edition. In order to complete the certification, the Association is required to have a certified inspector visually inspect EVERY fire sprinkler head and fire alarm device which includes the ones located inside each individual’s private unit."

This inspection is required in CA. The inspector will require that sprinklers that are obstructed by repaired so the sprinkler can function. But how will you get your HOA to comply so that they schedule an inspection. In our case, the agency contacts our manager every year.
DeborahM8 (California)
Posts: 4
Posted:
I like the idea of reporting it so the fire department can handle it. Great suggestion. thanks!
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
It should be noted that IF you do report it to the fire department and they find a violation, your HOA will be paying a stiff fine or repairs. Who do you think will pay the fines if they do find violations or need replaced/repaired? The HOA right? That is what you and your neighbors fund. It's NOT the MC. So better to do the research before jumping down that rabbit hole.

Former HOA President
LayaS (Nebraska)
Posts: 249
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 02/13/2023 3:32 PM
It should be noted that IF you do report it to the fire department and they find a violation, your HOA will be paying a stiff fine or repairs. Who do you think will pay the fines if they do find violations or need replaced/repaired? The HOA right? That is what you and your neighbors fund. It's NOT the MC. So better to do the research before jumping down that rabbit hole.

To hell with the money. SAFETY first!
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I never said to forget safety. Matter of fact the opposite. I encourage them to do the research first before knee jerk reacting. It would be cheaper for everyone if the HOA was able to find a solution before adding a fine on top of it. Which would be the result. The HOA would have to pay the fines and then the repairs. I would rather pay for the repairs without the fines myself...

Former HOA President
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Please see my above, Deborah. Before contacting the Fire. Dept., ask you community manager about this. Ask her/him if they've received notice yet for mandatory annual inspection. Your manager, by he way, is NOT qualified to answer legal questions, e.g., whether the old ones need to be uncovered. (of course they do! & I'm not legal e person) Let the inspector take care of that. They are very strict. And rightly so.
JohnT38 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,631
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LayaS on 02/13/2023 3:37 PM
Posted By MelissaP1 on 02/13/2023 3:32 PM
It should be noted that IF you do report it to the fire department and they find a violation, your HOA will be paying a stiff fine or repairs. Who do you think will pay the fines if they do find violations or need replaced/repaired? The HOA right? That is what you and your neighbors fund. It's NOT the MC. So better to do the research before jumping down that rabbit hole.


To hell with the money. SAFETY first!

Exactly. Melissa would rather research the issue while the condos burned down.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Wow more words in my mouth yet again and criticized for. Gaslight much?

What about asking questions first before going all out over something is not letting a house burn down. How do we know the current setup is not already been inspected and past code in the past? It is just the new way of doing things is different but just as safe?

Talk about jumping to conclusions... Do NO6 ASSUME. More details as no one is a sprinkler expert except the sprinkler experts you should do research with...

Former HOA President
LetA (Nevada)
Posts: 2,679
Posted:
Safety first absolutely, but the ultimately will lie with the unit owner or renter. God forbid there is a loss and the fire sprinkler can't do it's job, that will be up to the fire investigator and insurance adjuster to duke out.
The insurance company will likely fault the owner, renter.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnT38 on 02/13/2023 3:07 PM
Posted By DeborahM8 on 02/13/2023 2:44 PM
There are some units in my condo that have garage storage constructed over garage fire sprinklers. The HOA board is saying these owners should be "grandfathered in" and retain their storage covering the sprinklers, but new construction has to leave the sprinklers explosed. I'm opposed to having separate rules for owners in the same buildiing.

I've asked the HOA management association to determine whether the fire sprinklers are legally required and whether the older garage storage units need to be removed to be in legal compliance. I have not heard an answer back. What is legally required in Los Angeles, CA?


Report it to the local Fire Marshall or Fire Department. Let them deal with it. This is ridiculous.

I agree.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
LetA, in CA the owner or resident has no choice, their Units and garages and everywell else that has sprinkles WILL be inspected. And mandatory repairs will be followed up on.
JeanneH3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 158
Posted:


There was a somewhat similar problem with our condo complex. HOA BOD had plans to install 54 4X6X6' sheds under the buildings without any input from owners. Owners were told that a BOD member and our MC rep walked the property determining where these 54 sheds could go. It was presented at the annual meeting as fait accompli which prompted subsequent questions such as, "Has the Fire Marshall signed off on this plan?" BOD ignored all questions and concerns from owners about these storage sheds and proceeded with installing 16 of them under the buildings. I was the person who called the Fire Marshall and within a day the Fire Inspector visited the site, and issued a Stop Work Order immediately. The BOD and MC had never contacted the Town seeking permits to install the storage sheds and we have since learned that the Town will not allow these sheds under the buildings.

Fire code, at least in my area, requires a minimum clearance of 18" from the bottom of the fire suppression sprinkler to the top of any structure or stack of boxes. The circular arc of water from the sprinkler can also not be impeded.

Are there any permits for the older storage units? Our town requires permits from the Building Department, Zoning Department and the Fire Marshall. Failure to acquire these permits threatens insurance coverage btw and you have a right to know if the covered sprinklers invalidates your insurance coverage or increases your premiums.

I know our town's fire code is more stringent than the state fire code and there is a yearly inspection of public buildings like condos. You could call the Fire Marshall and request any records of past inspections to see if the town is grandfathering in these sheds and if so, ask why.
DeborahM8 (California)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Super helpful JeanneH3. Thank you!
JeanneH3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 158
Posted:

There is more to my saga of the storage sheds. The Board had the MC post a draft of the January BOD meeting minutes about a week ago. This is a rarity considering only one other set of minutes has been released in 4 years. In it, it details how the BOD has been informed by the town that none of the sheds can go under the buildings nor in parking spaces around the perimeter of the complex leaving only the dumpster area for possible location of maybe a handful of sheds. The 16 sheds currently installed under the buildings by the board must be removed. The BOD's reaction to this was to authorize our MC rep to contact the town building department and ask about the legality of "large" storage bins and closets owned privately by association members.

This is a rather interesting focus the BOD has taken considering 2 things: 1) there had been no thought as to how big their sheds were at the time of purchase and installation; and 2) in 2018 the BOD had changed the rules removing restrictions on storage container size so for years there had no concern for the size and even number of storage deck boxes and closets in owners' parking areas under the buildings. I called the town fire marshal and building codes department on Friday and discovered that they had discovered that the complex had originally been permitted for parking only under the buildings and not for storage. There were no permits allowing any storage at all. None of the storage containers currently under the buildings are legal and within a week the BOD will receive a letter informing them of the need to have ALL storage removed. I was stunned and wasn't expecting this development and asked, "Even deck boxes?" Everything. THE BOD can file an application for a permit to allow storage under the buildings but there's no guarantee it would be approved. From old meeting minutes, it appears long gone BOD members knew of the limitation of the permit because all storage under the buildings was against condo rules and regulations and owners were warned that leaving anything overnight would be removed but that changed in 2015 after nearly a decade.

So, Deborah, don't assume the older sheds in your complex are legal. They may not be. Ask your local building codes or whatever government agency does permitting what, if any, prior permits are applicable to the property.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here