šŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JohnK40 (West Virginia)
Posts: 59
Posted:
This week the members were informed by the Board Of Directors that the President has been removed.

Specifically the notice read "After a lengthy discussion of current situation inside *****, it was determined that too many things were being handled without total board knowledge and approval. The board voted to remove Mr. **** as president but remain on the board."

Is the Board under any obligation to inform me just what 'current situation" led to the Presidents removal?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
They did.
The individual was making decisions and implementing them without the boards approval or knowledge.

Typically, the Presidents only responsibilities are:

1) Preside over meetings of the board and membership
2) Sign contracts and checks on behalf of the Association

That's all the authority the governing documents typically give them.

If you want to know more, I'd suggest asking to review minutes of board meetings or simply ask.
WendyM5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 1,522
Posted:
No.
never hurts to ask.
removing someone one is a lot different than someone resigning
the fact that he's still on the board is interesting
attend the next board meeting or better yet just call a board member out of the blue.

vis ta vie
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By WendyM5 on 12/23/2022 5:11 AM

the fact that he's still on the board is interesting

Not really.
If elected by the membership to serve as a Director, the Board does not have the authority to remove them as a Director.
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
I am going to disagree, the president asks as the CEO of the corporation and has more responsibilities than running a meeting and signing a couple of contracts.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Max,

I did specify that this is what governing documents typically specify.

However, I agree that the position carries many perceived responsibilities.
Some of them being:

Verify that the decisions of the Board are carried out
Verify that the Association is in compliance with the governing documents
Verify that the Association is in compliance with State & Federal laws
Be the ā€œfaceā€ and voice for the Association
WendyM5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 1,522
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 12/23/2022 5:13 AM
Posted By WendyM5 on 12/23/2022 5:11 AM

the fact that he's still on the board is interesting


Not really.
If elected by the membership to serve as a Director, the Board does not have the authority to remove them as a Director.

maybe in your community. In my hoa all it takes is 2 directors to remove the third one permanently regardless of how she got into the position.

vis ta vie
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By WendyM5 on 12/23/2022 6:12 AM
Posted By TimB4 on 12/23/2022 5:13 AM
Posted By WendyM5 on 12/23/2022 5:11 AM

the fact that he's still on the board is interesting


Not really.
If elected by the membership to serve as a Director, the Board does not have the authority to remove them as a Director.


maybe in your community. In my hoa all it takes is 2 directors to remove the third one permanently regardless of how she got into the position.

Interesting.

Since most Assocaitions are incorporated, I would think that this would be a violation of the § 55A-8-08. Removal of directors elected by members or directors. unless it's for missing a specific number of meetings (as outlined in the bylaws).

Again, that statute is only applicable if the Association is incorporated.
WendyM5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 1,522
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 12/23/2022 6:23 AM
Posted By WendyM5 on 12/23/2022 6:12 AM
Posted By TimB4 on 12/23/2022 5:13 AM
Posted By WendyM5 on 12/23/2022 5:11 AM

the fact that he's still on the board is interesting


Not really.
If elected by the membership to serve as a Director, the Board does not have the authority to remove them as a Director.


maybe in your community. In my hoa all it takes is 2 directors to remove the third one permanently regardless of how she got into the position.


Interesting.

Since most Assocaitions are incorporated, I would think that this would be a violation of the § 55A-8-08. Removal of directors elected by members or directors. unless it's for missing a specific number of meetings (as outlined in the bylaws).

Again, that statute is only applicable if the Association is incorporated.

i guess you are right now that I have reviewed that, but our bylaws state otherwise. one more reason they need to be updated.

vis ta vie
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By WendyM5 on 12/23/2022 6:50 AM
Posted By TimB4 on 12/23/2022 6:23 AM

... snip ...

Interesting.

Since most Assocaitions are incorporated, I would think that this would be a violation of the § 55A-8-08. Removal of directors elected by members or directors. unless it's for missing a specific number of meetings (as outlined in the bylaws).

Again, that statute is only applicable if the Association is incorporated.


i guess you are right now that I have reviewed that, but our bylaws state otherwise. one more reason they need to be updated.

An observation: if directors were allowed to remove other directors, this would help keep entrenched boards in place. If a community can't manage to hold a Special Meeting for some reason, their only option is replacing directors as their terms expire. If, for instance, you have a three person board, and one new director is elected but the two rogue directors promptly remove them, the community would never get beyond square one.
WendyM5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 1,522
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CathyA3 on 12/23/2022 7:24 AM
Posted By WendyM5 on 12/23/2022 6:50 AM
Posted By TimB4 on 12/23/2022 6:23 AM

... snip ...

Interesting.

Since most Assocaitions are incorporated, I would think that this would be a violation of the § 55A-8-08. Removal of directors elected by members or directors. unless it's for missing a specific number of meetings (as outlined in the bylaws).

Again, that statute is only applicable if the Association is incorporated.


i guess you are right now that I have reviewed that, but our bylaws state otherwise. one more reason they need to be updated.


An observation: if directors were allowed to remove other directors, this would help keep entrenched boards in place. If a community can't manage to hold a Special Meeting for some reason, their only option is replacing directors as their terms expire. If, for instance, you have a three person board, and one new director is elected but the two rogue directors promptly remove them, the community would never get beyond square one.

lol you just described how hundreds perhaps thousands of HOAs are run. Except it's not as nefarious as that. What happens is their is a vacancy and the board appoints a new person to that position for a full 3 year term. even if the calendar says the term is up in 10 months. this keeps happening for decades because the governing docs say the board can do this and no one bothers to check when terms actually expire. PM enables the corrupt board to keep doing this because they don't wnat to deal with educating new board members.

vis ta vie
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Our Bylaws are clear. Any person appointed to the BOD by the BOD will serve out the remaining term of the BOD Member they replaced. Thus it could be as long as two years for us.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
How about citing your Bylaws, Wendy. ONLY the Section that states directors may be removed by other directors from the Board AND for what reasons.

Agree that JohnK's board need give the membership no additional info.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Our Bylaws say a few things as per the subject the OP started:

1. A BOD Member elected by the homeowners can only be removed from the BOD via 51% of all owners voting to do so.
2. The BOD elects its Officers. The BOD can vote to hold a BOD Election any time they wish. This is how a BOD could
remove an Officer (say the President) but that person is still a BOD Member.
3. Any person appointed to the BOD by the BOD, can be removed from the BOD by the BOD alone.

I wonder how the OP's BOD were able to remove the person for the Presidency? If as my above #1, then their letter was poorly worded. It sounds like an accusation of wrong doing). They should have just sent a letter out saying the BOD held a Officer's Election and the Officers are now so and so. The letter, as worded, makes for more questions about the incident.
WendyM5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 1,522
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 12/23/2022 7:59 AM
Our Bylaws are clear. Any person appointed to the BOD by the BOD will serve out the remaining term of the BOD Member they replaced. Thus it could be as long as two years for us.

ours are too, however determining when a position ends is as clear as mud. Does the position end in 1, 2 or 3 years? The board never published when each board member position ends so they can just say it's a 3 year position every time. What the PM actually did is declare a new 3 years term every time illegally. Not until I took over did I insist on elections every year and for postion term years to be publsihed on our website.

vis ta vie
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
What DO your Bylaws say, Wendy, about terms of serve for directors. Or, is there perhaps something in your Articles of Corporation?
WendyM5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 1,522
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/23/2022 10:14 AM
What DO your Bylaws say, Wendy, about terms of serve for directors. Or, is there perhaps something in your Articles of Corporation?

Mine state 3 years. thus the confusion!

Because in the bylaws it also states the intial terms of the 3 directors are 1, 2 and 3 years, thus one term expires every year. However that was never followed and when I asked why elections were not being held, I'd get the bullshit answer that terms are for 3 years.

It really does take someone who gives a crap to follow the rules because the PM was activley against having elections every year.

vis ta vie
BillH10 (Texas)
Posts: 1,217
Posted:
Wendy

As the PM we consider it one of our responsibilities to keep track of which director term expires when; the chart is available to any owner who asks and is published with the annual meeting package each year.

This to us is a 'cardinal sin' item which would result in our terminating the contract if a Board attempted to take an approach to initial, elected, or appointed replacement terms of office or filling a vacancy on the Board using a process not authorized in the Bylaws.

It is not always tracked correctly as you suggest, but not on our watch with our clients.
WendyM5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 1,522
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BillH10 on 12/23/2022 11:35 AM
Wendy

As the PM we consider it one of our responsibilities to keep track of which director term expires when; the chart is available to any owner who asks and is published with the annual meeting package each year.

This to us is a 'cardinal sin' item which would result in our terminating the contract if a Board attempted to take an approach to initial, elected, or appointed replacement terms of office or filling a vacancy on the Board using a process not authorized in the Bylaws.

It is not always tracked correctly as you suggest, but not on our watch with our clients.

glad to hear that, unfortunately I believe you are in the minority of PM's. I think our HOA has used 3 or 4 different PM's over the last 25+ years and all of them did not hold an annual election as the bylaws state.

vis ta vie
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By WendyM5 on 12/23/2022 10:47 AM
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/23/2022 10:14 AM
What DO your Bylaws say, Wendy, about terms of serve for directors. Or, is there perhaps something in your Articles of Corporation?


Mine state 3 years. thus the confusion!

Because in the bylaws it also states the intial terms of the 3 directors are 1, 2 and 3 years, thus one term expires every year. However that was never followed and when I asked why elections were not being held, I'd get the bullshit answer that terms are for 3 years.

It really does take someone who gives a crap to follow the rules because the PM was activley against having elections every year.

Those initial terms are probably for the transition period to homeowner control. It's how the staggered terms get established.

My bylaws say the same, and the first two homeowners to become directors served one and two year terms, respectively. The third homeowner to be elected served a full three years, transition was complete, and we had three directors serving staggered three year terms. All of our directors, whether elected or appointed, are treated the same. They serve a full three years or the remainder of the term to which they were appointed - even if a director resigned one day into his term and the "remainder" is two years and 364 days. Only our homeowners can remove a director, and they can do so for any reason or no reason at all. Aside from homeowner vote, the only thing that gets a director booted early is if he misses three consecutive board meetings, at which point he is deemed to have resigned.

It makes life a lot easier this way.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
think Cathy's probably right. But I'll try a gain. What exactly do your bylaws say, about terms, Wendy?

What exactly do they say about WHO may "fire" directors? And under what conditions??

MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/23/2022 4:46 PM
think Cathy's probably right. But I'll try a gain. What exactly do your bylaws say, about terms, Wendy?

What exactly do they say about WHO may "fire" directors? And under what conditions??


I reviewed your "new" Bylaws and would have a field day in court challenging all the reasons your board can remove a director. WOW!
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Still obsessed with me, eh, Max? Brrrrrrr.
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/23/2022 6:02 PM
Still obsessed with me, eh, Max? Brrrrrrr.

Nope, but your Bylaws are a "hot" mess.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Why do you care so MUCH, Max?
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/23/2022 6:54 PM
Why do you care so MUCH, Max?

It's funny, you insist on having people post exactly what's in their documents. Maybe we should post the masterpiece that you were in charge of.
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/23/2022 6:54 PM
Why do you care so MUCH, Max?

Btw..happy holidays
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Geez, Max, how would my specific HOA's Bylaws relate in any way to the OP?
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Wendy

In doing some research, I came across a set of Bylaws that I found interesting. Most of the posters have said, if elected by the membership, only the membership may recall. Here one association took it a few steps further.

(c) Authority of Board to Remove Directors. The Board shall have the power and authority to remove a Director and declare the office vacant if the Board discovers and determines that such director did not during the course of their candidacy, or does not, while serving as a Director, meet, or continue to meet, any Candidate Qualifications. The Board shall not have the power to remove from office any Director on the basis only that such person was appointed by the Board itself to fill a vacancy on the Board. Further, before any Board member is removed from office, such Board member will be provided with an opportunity to be heard at a hearing of the Board which conforms with the requirements of Corporations Code Section 7341. In addition to any provisions contained in the Election Rules as to Candidate Qualifications, the Board, by a majority vote of the Directors who meet all of the required qualifications relating to serving directors, may declare vacant the office of any Director if the Director

(i) Fails (unless excused by the Board) to attend either (i) three (3) consecutive regularly scheduled meetings of the Board or (ii) five (5) regularly scheduled meetings of the Board within any twelve (12) consecutive month period.

(ii) Fails to comply with a duly approved action or direction of the Board which the Board reasonably considers should have been complied with by the Director while serving in the capacity of a Director.

(iii) Fails to comply with the Association Governing Documents, not limited to the payment of regular and/or special assessments or other money owed or due to the Association (apart from the payment of fines, collection charges, late charges or costs levied by a third party).

(iv) Receives any type of monetary gain, or other gains such as services, products, gifts, or gratuities of a significant value (in the opinion of the Board) which have been provided in re Board, and which has not been promptly disclosed to the Board at an open meeting of the Board, sanctioned by the Board and recorded in the minutes.

(v) Takes any action considered (in the reasonable opinion of the Board) to be grossly detrimental to the general safety, health, and welfare of the community and its members or which the Director knew, or should have known, would or might create significant legal liability to the Association or legal position.

(vi) Unless previously authorized in writing by a majority of the Board, fails to keep confidential all confidential Board information, including but not limited to discussions and information received during Executive Session Board Meetings and information which is subject to attorney-client privilege and which privilege vests in the Association.

You can remove a director if they fail to comply with the qualifications set forth that were in effect prior to the director’s term.

Here are those qualifications:

(b) Additional Requirements for Candidacy. In order for a person to be eligible for nomination and election to the Board (and to serve on the Board) such person must meet the following Candidate Qualifications:
(i) Not be delinquent in the payment of regular or special assessments, provided that if the candidate is a natural person who has been designated by a non-natural person entity Owner to be a member for the purposes of running for the Board, it is the non-natural person entity Owner who must not be delinquent in the payment of such assessments;
(ii) Not serve, or run for election as a Director if, on election, Co-Owners of the same condominium(s) (or natural person designated by a non-natural entity Owner of that condominium) would be serving on the Board concurrently. Such Candidate Qualification includes not being a candidate when another Owner of the condominium (or natural person designated by a non-natural entity Owner of that condominium) has already been accepted for nomination as a candidate;
(iii) Have been an Owner of a condominium (or be designated by a non-natural entity Owner who has been an Owner of a condominium) in the project for at least one year as measured from the date that the request for candidate nominations is sent out; and
(iv) Not have a criminal conviction that would, if the candidate were elected, prevent the Association from purchasing the fidelity bond coverage required by Civil Code Section 5806 or result in the termination of the Association’s existing fidelity bond coverage.

https://www.davis-stirling.com/HOME/D/Director-Removal-by-the-Board

So under their rules, throw out ii, most of iii, iv, v, vi.

For the Members to remove a director,

(d) Authority of Members to Remove Directors. Except as otherwise provided in subparagraphs (c) and (e) hereof, a Director may only be removed from office before the expiration of the term by the affirmative vote of the members provided that a quorum of not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the voting power of the membership is achieved by the initial deadline date for the return of ballots.

(e) Filling of Vacancies. Vacancies on the Board of Directors may be filled by a majority vote of the remaining Directors, though less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining Director unless the vacancy is created through the removal of a Director by the action of the members or Board, in which case the vacancy shall only be filled by a vote of the members. Notwithstanding the above, a vacancy of a Director elected or appointed by the Commercial Owners may only be filled by a vote or appointment of the Commercial Owners. Furthermore, the members may elect a Director or Directors at any time to fill any vacancy or vacancies not filled by the Directors.

How many are required to remove a director? And if a Board removed a director, then only the Members have the authority to elect their replacement, which now takes almost 5 months.
One of the best lines throughout the Bylaws is they have ā€œsecret electionsā€ whereas the other HOAs have ā€œelections that require secret ballotsā€.

For example:

Section 3.7. Election of Directors.
(a) Directors Elected by Secret Ballot. The regular election of Directors and any
special election to fill a vacancy on the Board shall be conducted by secret election. Directors shall be elected to fill the number of positions on the Board then expiring.

MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/24/2022 9:02 AM
Geez, Max, how would my specific HOA's Bylaws relate in any way to the OP?

It relates to your questioning of Wendy.

šŸŽÆ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • āœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • āœ“ Share your experience
  • āœ“ Get expert advice
  • āœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here