I did some checking on what's going on in other states, and it reinforced my comment about the laws being very location-specific. Some state laws require that STRs be allowed in residential communities. Some of these laws, however, defer to a community's CC&Rs and do permit communities to restrict such usage. In the few cases I saw that referred to prohibiting business usage of residential property, the communities also had restrictions that prohibited short-term housing specifically.
What Is a Lien? From CAI, a discussion of the Kentucky case:
Short-term Rental Case Impacting Community Associations Quote from the article:
The nature of short-term rentals is not intuitively harmonious with the community association housing model, which focuses on bringing people together, strengthening neighborhood bonds, and promoting a sense of community and belonging. ...
CAI opposes governmental regulations that would intrude on a board of directors’ autonomy to serve the best interest of the association. Short-term rental regulation should not impair association contractual covenants and take decision-making authority away from community association homeowners. This degrades the very core of community association governance, which is based on private contractual obligations of the community’s homeowners. A review of some other cases from a law firm:
HOAs and COAs increasingly confront owner challenges to regulation of short-term rental An amusing quote:
But an enterprising owner developed an interesting work-around for the owner-occupied requirement. He placed his unit in an LLC, and then he sold small percentage shares of the LLC to would-be short-term renters that the LLC documents required the purchaser to sell back to the LLC at the end of their stay. It allowed the short-term renter to say: “I’m not a tenant. I’m a co-owner.” Comment: the owner may be "enterprising", but IMHO he's stupid. It can be surprisingly difficult to remove people from property even when there is no legal agreement in place - the last thing you want to do is give them ownership rights and then hope they abide by the agreement they signed. The so-called renter isn't too smart either, since for that brief period of time he'll assume the risks shared by all other owners. But this is a topic for another day...