BernieJ (Virginia)
Posts: 31
Posts: 31
Posted:
My HOA Board appointed a committee to assess the need to implement a rental cap on investor-owned units. At a public Board meeting one of the Directors got into a verbal altercation with the committee chair and threatened to harm him. This lead to a police report being filed and all of the committee members filing a complaint to the Association manager via the Virginia DPOR complaint procedure process, siting several violations of Robert's Rules of order. The association attorney sent a "Special Meeting of the Board of Directors" notice to the membership to answer to the complaint that was filed. The notice stated the purpose of the meeting was to consider the complaints that have been received and NO OTHTER BUSINESS WILL BE CONDUCTED.
When the meeting was held, the association attorney opened the meeting and informed everyone that only the complaints that were filed will be discussed, no other matters of the association will be heard. No minutes were taken and no agenda was prepared. This was also stated by the attorney. ? .
Several homeowners addressed the Board with questions and comments about the Board conduct being out of line, etc. The discussion period ended and the Board went into executive session. Most everyone went home to await the letter that the attorney would mail to members who filed the complaintS, but one of the committee members who filed a complaint stayed until the Board came out of executive session. He immediately sent an email to each of the committee members stating that the Board is asking the committee for their report at the annual meeting and a few other things related to the complaint, and they adjourned the meeting.
When the letter from the attorney was received a few days later, it we pretty much in order except for a comment made that the "Board will allow the committee to present a final report the membership, PRIOR to the annual meeting and that will be the final task of the Committee and "THE BOARD HAS VOTED TO DISBAND THE COMMITTEE AS OF THE START TIME OF THE ANNUAL MEETING".
When I questioned the attorney's "Final Determination Letter" that clearly stated the Board had voted on a matter that was not mentioned in the complaint, and was not even mentioned prior to the meeting or after executive session, her defense on that motion was permitted under a paragraph in our bylaws "Board Action By Consent" which permits the Board to conduct association business without calling a meeting. Virginia Non Stock Corporation Act 13.1-865 Action without meeting of board of directors, is permitted.
I can see where the Board may be able to ban the committee at anytime under this section of the 13.1, however, the action was made while in executive session for the complaints that were filed, which did not question or say anything to the effect or the desire of the Board to dissolve the committee.
Was the Association attorney wrong by allowing the Board to vote on dissolving the committee during the executive session at the Special Meeting? I think she was wrong, regardless of the Board Action By Consent being used. The Board could have called that action the next day or prior to the annual meeting or any other time. I received a copy of the Board Action By Consent signed by all Board members on the day that the special meeting took place.
One more note, the complaint that was filed sited improper conduct, failure to follow Robert's Rules of Order, improper adjournment of the meeting.
When the meeting was held, the association attorney opened the meeting and informed everyone that only the complaints that were filed will be discussed, no other matters of the association will be heard. No minutes were taken and no agenda was prepared. This was also stated by the attorney. ? .
Several homeowners addressed the Board with questions and comments about the Board conduct being out of line, etc. The discussion period ended and the Board went into executive session. Most everyone went home to await the letter that the attorney would mail to members who filed the complaintS, but one of the committee members who filed a complaint stayed until the Board came out of executive session. He immediately sent an email to each of the committee members stating that the Board is asking the committee for their report at the annual meeting and a few other things related to the complaint, and they adjourned the meeting.
When the letter from the attorney was received a few days later, it we pretty much in order except for a comment made that the "Board will allow the committee to present a final report the membership, PRIOR to the annual meeting and that will be the final task of the Committee and "THE BOARD HAS VOTED TO DISBAND THE COMMITTEE AS OF THE START TIME OF THE ANNUAL MEETING".
When I questioned the attorney's "Final Determination Letter" that clearly stated the Board had voted on a matter that was not mentioned in the complaint, and was not even mentioned prior to the meeting or after executive session, her defense on that motion was permitted under a paragraph in our bylaws "Board Action By Consent" which permits the Board to conduct association business without calling a meeting. Virginia Non Stock Corporation Act 13.1-865 Action without meeting of board of directors, is permitted.
I can see where the Board may be able to ban the committee at anytime under this section of the 13.1, however, the action was made while in executive session for the complaints that were filed, which did not question or say anything to the effect or the desire of the Board to dissolve the committee.
Was the Association attorney wrong by allowing the Board to vote on dissolving the committee during the executive session at the Special Meeting? I think she was wrong, regardless of the Board Action By Consent being used. The Board could have called that action the next day or prior to the annual meeting or any other time. I received a copy of the Board Action By Consent signed by all Board members on the day that the special meeting took place.
One more note, the complaint that was filed sited improper conduct, failure to follow Robert's Rules of Order, improper adjournment of the meeting.